Jump to content

The Ashes and us - How desi cricket is done


diga

Recommended Posts

Posted

The English and Aussie commentators may not be perfect and they also have a lot of biases but our bunch is worse. BCCI monopoly on everything just throttles any dissenting voice.

Posted

Indian cricket commentary sucks (Except when Dravid and Kumble were doing stuff in Australian radio). English one is okay until you get Agnew, Botham or Warne, Saffers get pissy easily, NZ are just blah, Windies are dull. Australia is a weird one. The Ashes coverage has been great from Channel 9. They are actually focusing on the cricket and kept it simple. Commentary team is - Mark Taylor - Ian Healy - Michael Vaughan - David Lloyd - Mark Nicholas Added for the 2nd test were - Brett Lee - Shane Warne Warne made it worse because he goes on stupid tangents. But it's like without the whole Australian audience it has actually been great. Healy has surprised me the most. He has actually been on point and very perspective. Also C9 and co they will speak up as they have. Chappell did about Steve Waugh, Healy did on Wade, Taylor did a few times. It's just that they are forced to cater to the casual public in Australia.

Posted
His article in cricinfo is titled - Why the Ashes is watchable and Indian cricket isn't http://www.espncricinfo.com/magazine/content/story/901103.html One of the many anti-India articles on cricinfo. Also this guy Mukul Kesavan teaches history at Jamia Millia Islamia, Delhi.
Beacuse of Starc, Hazelwood,Johnson and Smith. We love to watch quality bowling and world best batsman trying to win a away series.Take Aussie bowlers out and Ashes will become bore fest.
Posted

"A rule of thumb: if ever in doubt whether or not to make a comment about something, perform a series of vocalised pauses, such as "um", "hmm", or that old favourite, "uhh". No one will be able to tell the difference from your regular commentary. " lol

Posted

Shastri and Bhogle are the only BCCI suckers in commentary box. And now that Shastri has moved on, it's only Bhogle. The rest -- either have personalities that are either too soft to say anything controversial. Or they're incapable of talking about anything that routine ball to ball commentary with comments like "That's a slower one". " That's a good shot for four" , "That's gone for six"etc

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...