kosingh Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 Other than Roshit, Kohli and Rahane has any batsman played in all games?
maniac Posted August 31, 2015 Author Posted August 31, 2015 Also both his 50's were almost match setting up innings.....even his 20 odd in the first innings got high praise from critics....It was a very good innings in a very tricky phase...He never actually had a disastrous innings...maybe the 1st test,he was below par and that's about it. The hate he gets is definitely not proportional to his performance
Kalia_Test Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 Other than Roshit' date=' Kohli and Rahane has any batsman played in all games?[/quote'] Rahul. The key to know consistency is to knock off the highest and lowest scores and then take average ( i.e outliers removed ). So out go Kohli and Rahane's solitory tons and Rohit with his impeccable consistency will come out right at top :two_thumbs_up:
kosingh Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 A true Indian legend. The volcano of virginal talent has exploded. Rohit Sharma lost his virginity in the grandest possible way today.
sage Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 [scene: Alluring, resplendent night sky] Devi: Bhagwan... why do you look so sad? GOD: I want to play cricket *poof* Date: April 30, 1987 Rohit Sharma is born
Laaloo Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 lol that must have been the greatest 20 odd innings in history Afridi90 1
vvvslaxman Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 Average of 33 lol Mishraji is more valuable with bat than him in this series.
maniac Posted August 31, 2015 Author Posted August 31, 2015 Average of 33 lol Mishraji is more valuable with bat than him in this series. Yeah now lets start cherry picking stats :giggle:...you can't hide facts and also he has been India's most consistent this series regardless of what you think....Played 4 crucial innings out of 6. 2 critical 50's one that won the game and the other that set up a game....2 tricky partnerships where his own flair and natural stroke making ability was sacrificed to buckle down uncharacteristically ...first the Rahane 100 and then the Pujara 100 would not have been possible without his support....so that is 4 MVP like innings out of 6.
Laaloo Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 Yeah now lets start cherry picking stats :giggle:...you can't hide facts and also he has been India's most consistent this series regardless of what you think....Played 4 crucial innings out of 6. 2 critical 50's one that won the game and the other that set up a game....2 tricky partnerships where his own flair and natural stroke making ability was sacrificed to buckle down uncharacteristically ...first the Rahane 100 and then the Pujara 100 would not have been possible without his support....so that is 4 MVP like innings out of 6. it was not sacrificed. He just couldn't rotate strike and was bogged down Afridi90 1
maniac Posted August 31, 2015 Author Posted August 31, 2015 it was not sacrificed. He just couldn't rotate strike and was bogged down His 20 odd in the first innings won high critical acclaim.....Manjrekar I believe even said the final score he got did not do the innings justice.
sage Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 My reaction when someone has the audacity to criticise Rohit after all he's done for the team:
BeautifulGame Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 He is our 2nd highest scorer because Vijay (our best batsmen)and Dhawan are injured and Pujara has just played this one test And Rahane was shifted to no.3 to accommodate him at 5 .So Rahane also was forced bat in a unfamiliar position in last 2 tests . Before the start of second innings of this test Pujara had nearly scored as many runs in one innings as Rohit had in the entire series (5 innings combined ) .And the hate is becoz he was played ahead of the same Pujara in the first two tests . The reality is he only batted better than Rahul as others were injured(Vijay and Dhawan) dropped (Pujara) unfairly shifted(Rahane) to accommodate Rohit And Rohit is the only specialist bat (Apart from Vijay ) who hasn't scored a 100 for us in this series
BeautifulGame Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 My reaction when someone has the audacity to criticise Rohit after all he's done for the team: That is the same reaction for everyone else when we see Nohit name in the team sheet
Pagalpanti Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 His 20 odd in the first innings won high critical acclaim.....Manjrekar I believe even said the final score he got did not do the innings justice. Manjrekar and SunnyG are no better than you Rohit Bhakts.
maniac Posted August 31, 2015 Author Posted August 31, 2015 He is our 2nd highest scorer because Vijay (our best batsmen)and Dhawan are injured and Pujara has just played this one test And Rahane was shifted to no.3 to accommodate him at 5 .So Rahane also was forced bat in a unfamiliar position in last 2 tests . Before the start of second innings of this test Pujara had nearly scored as many runs in one innings as Rohit had in the entire series (5 innings combined ) .And the hate is becoz he was played ahead of the same Pujara in the first two tests . The reality is he only batted better than Rahul as others were injured(Vijay and Dhawan) dropped (Pujara) unfairly shifted(Rahane) to accommodate Rohit And Rohit is the only specialist bat (Apart from Vijay ) who hasn't scored a 100 for us in this series SO Rahane has a tough time at 3 it is unfair but Rohit Sharma scores at No 5 than No 3 but is some kind of conspiracy. No one is blaming Rahane for the odd failure and I get it ...he is class but I don't get the unjustified hate for Rohit despite him performing....he may have not set the world on fire here but sure this was an above-average performance by all standards.
BeautifulGame Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 SO Rahane has a tough time at 3 it is unfair but Rohit Sharma scores at No 5 than No 3 but is some kind of conspiracy. No one is blaming Rahane for the odd failure and I get it ...he is class but I don't get the unjustified hate for Rohit despite him performing....he may have not set the world on fire here but sure this was an above-average performance by all standards. Because we did that and selected Rohit by dropping Pujara .Instead of bringing the natural no.3 in Pujara to replace Rohit we sacrificed Rahane in an unfamiliar role to keep Rohit in the team We have Pujara who averages 80 in sub continent better that anyone in cricketing history yet we dont play him at no.3 because we want to accommodate Rohit .Tell me why shouldnt we put up with above average performances when we have our best player of spin bowling in the bench? Please dont tell me Rohit deserves no.5 ahead of Rahane because Rohit batted ahead of Rahane at 5 in SA tour.Only after his poor tecnique was exposed and Rahane proved himself with runs was he promoted to no.5 Now we shifted him where he averages 50 so as to accomodate Rohit again? So why the feck should we not be complaining about Rohit when the whole team is being messed with so as to select Rohit Most wont complain (atleast i wont) if he selected as no.6 in the side .But if we want go with five bowlers in sub continent then Rohit has no business being in the team.Both Pujara and Rahane are far superior players than him .So its natural he gets the hate when he is selected
fineleg Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 In this Test - batting: Mishra and Ashwin > Nohit As tail they have overachieved (esp mishy), as a prime bat, Nohit has underachieved. (And those two contribute by bowling as well)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now