Jump to content

ISIS Beheads American Journalist


FischerTal

Recommended Posts

^ all newspapers and tv channels are tearing into kejriwal for not staging protests for the act...
Newspapers and TV channels are paid to publish negative for Kejriwal. What is the point in protesting against ISIS terrorists? They need to be stopped through bombs not through protests. They need to wiped off. Don't know what Kejriwal will protest for and against whom?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Newspapers and TV channels are paid to publish negative for Kejriwal. What is the point in protesting against ISIS terrorists? They need to be stopped through bombs not through protests. They need to wiped off. Don't know what Kejriwal will protest for and against whom?
What???? He is a media darling. The news channels played a biggest part in his meteoric rise.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Newspapers and TV channels are paid to publish negative for Kejriwal. What is the point in protesting against ISIS terrorists? They need to be stopped through bombs not through protests. They need to wiped off. Don't know what Kejriwal will protest for and against whom?
:hysterical: was getting disproportionate amount of coverage & now that it has stopped, come out with outrageous claims
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What???? He is a media darling. The news channels played a biggest part in his meteoric rise.
They helped him in his rise until people could realize how big AAP phenomena has become. Once it was clear that AAP is going to challenge main stream parties, media was controlled and used to bring AAP down.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Newspapers and TV channels are paid to publish negative for Kejriwal. What is the point in protesting against ISIS terrorists? They need to be stopped through bombs not through protests. They need to wiped off. Don't know what Kejriwal will protest for and against whom?
i was replying to the sarcastic post by 'number' in the same vein. :giggle:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They helped him in his rise until people could realize how big AAP phenomena has become. Once it was clear that AAP is going to challenge main stream parties' date=' media was controlled and used to bring AAP down.[/quote'] don't want to derail.. so will stop it here reg. the "need" for protest againt ISIS, it's as laughable as the protests against Israel. Everybody knows the "Save Gaza" is for vote bank thing. Since there is no Kurdish Yazidi votebank in India, there is no use to protest. Even if someone protested, we might see some video of an Indian being killed by ISIS. Media morons can just whine.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Newspapers and TV channels are paid to publish negative for Kejriwal. What is the point in protesting against ISIS terrorists? They need to be stopped through bombs not through protests. They need to wiped off. Don't know what Kejriwal will protest for and against whom?
Hypersensitive.:giggle:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like the concept of a protest is lost on some. Protests are held against official power structure to initiate actions by them. What will a protest against ISIS achieve? Are they part of any regional or world forum where other official power structures can take action against them or engage in dialogue with them under protests from their citizens? It's like saying Indian citizens should have protested against Lashkar-e-Taiba after the Bombay attacks. Protest against Pakistan to force them to take action is a logical protest. When protests were held after the Delhi rape case they were against government forcing them to take swift action on the case, not against the rapists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like the concept of a protest is lost on some. Protests are held against official power structure to initiate actions by them. What will a protest against ISIS achieve? Are they part of any regional or world forum where other official power structures can take action against them or engage in dialogue with them under protests from their citizens? It's like saying Indian citizens should have protested against Lashkar-e-Taiba after the Bombay attacks. Protest against Pakistan to force them to take action is a logical protest. When protests were held after the Delhi rape case they were against government forcing them to take swift action on the case, not against the rapists.
so protest against your countries government to take some action against ISIS. David Cameron has been hammered by the British media for not doing more in Iraq/Syria. A protest is about lodging a complaint or airing your displeasure against an act of brutality/ or decision. Why is Kejriwal not protesting for the UN to send in a force to snuff out these guys?v The UN sitting by in this regard isnt it?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

so protest against your countries government to take some action against ISIS. David Cameron has been hammered by the British media for not doing more in Iraq/Syria. A protest is about lodging a complaint or airing your displeasure against an act of brutality/ or decision. Why is Kejriwal not protesting for the UN to send in a force to snuff out these guys?v The UN sitting by in this regard isnt it?
Does India have any presence in Iraq to challenge ISIS? Getting Indian citizens out of the country is the biggest priority and is already being done to the best of the capability and presence that India has by the government. UN action is what the US will want it to be, and the US is already providing air support to combat ISIS. They cannot send troops on the ground because of domestic constraints, and neither can a lot of western countries who got badly burnt in Iraq and Afghanistan over the last decade. If you think Cameron has been hammered now, it is nothing compared to the hammering he will get once soldier fatalities start piling up in a war that cannot be won without massive civilian casualties.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Newspapers and TV channels are paid to publish negative for Kejriwal. What is the point in protesting against ISIS terrorists? They need to be stopped through bombs not through protests. They need to wiped off. Don't know what Kejriwal will protest for and against whom?
:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: subhe subhe hasa diya. Thanks for the jokes Raghav
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does India have any presence in Iraq to challenge ISIS? Getting Indian citizens out of the country is the biggest priority and is already being done to the best of the capability and presence that India has by the government. UN action is what the US will want it to be, and the US is already providing air support to combat ISIS. They cannot send troops on the ground because of domestic constraints, and neither can a lot of western countries who got badly burnt in Iraq and Afghanistan over the last decade. If you think Cameron has been hammered now, it is nothing compared to the hammering he will get once soldier fatalities start piling up in a war that cannot be won without massive civilian casualties.
Has kejriwal ever backed away from a protest? Thats his bread and butter. Does India have presence to anywhere? You had some muslims in India for example protesting the death sentence of saddam hussein. Saddam Hussein's execution sparks protests http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-kerala/saddam-husseins-execution-sparks-protests/article3041243.ece (on a side note i wonder if the same lot will demonstrate their discomfort against ISIS and urge the Indian government to take action) This is just to prove a point that a protest need not lead to direct actions. Whether the USA or UK sends troops on the ground is a moot point. The issue is about why people protest. The point is protests need not result into any action being taken. Protests for me are about conveying your sentiment. Maybe kejriwal should gather the AAP faithful and march condemning the actions of ISIS. Maybe the Indian mullahs such as the Deobandis can issue a fatwa telling ISIS that their actions are not welcome. Its all silent on that front.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has kejriwal ever backed away from a protest? Thats his bread and butter. Does India have presence to anywhere? You had some muslims in India for example protesting the death sentence of saddam hussein. Saddam Hussein's execution sparks protests http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-kerala/saddam-husseins-execution-sparks-protests/article3041243.ece (on a side note i wonder if the same lot will demonstrate their discomfort against ISIS and urge the Indian government to take action) This is just to prove a point that a protest need not lead to direct actions. Whether the USA or UK sends troops on the ground is a moot point. The issue is about why people protest. The point is protests need not result into any action being taken. Protests for me are about conveying your sentiment. Maybe kejriwal should gather the AAP faithful and march condemning the actions of ISIS. Maybe the Indian mullahs such as the Deobandis can issue a fatwa telling ISIS that their actions are not welcome. Its all silent on that front.
Same illogical logic. Saddam execution was done by US and it makes sense to protest against US sovereign government. I am not justifying their cause of protest here. Just that it makes some sense to protest against US govt. What sense it would make to protest against ISIS? That would be outright stupidity unless you protesting against inaction of your own country or some other country which hears thing happening in your country. On other topic - I very much appreciative of what US is doing here. I know there also to be blamed for the mess brought upon in Iraq, but now they are getting involved when there is almost nothing to gain from.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same illogical logic. Saddam execution was done by US and it makes sense to protest against US sovereign government. I am not justifying their cause of protest here. Just that it makes some sense to protest against US govt. What sense it would make to protest against ISIS? That would be outright stupidity unless you protesting against inaction of your own country or some other country which hears thing happening in your country. On other topic - I very much appreciative of what US is doing here. I know there also to be blamed for the mess brought upon in Iraq, but now they are getting involved when there is almost nothing to gain from.
As i said a protest can be against anything or anyone. There are no limitations. I have posted in this thread about protests happening against ISIS across the world. The Iraq protest in India was just to illuminate on the principle of protesting even though a protest is useless (as it was in that case)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...