Trichromatic Posted May 11, 2017 Posted May 11, 2017 Quote Two-time ICC Champions Trophy winners Australia are looking to lift the trophy on a third occasion this summer, and they have a squad that is very much capable of doing so. They recorded back-to-back wins in 2006 and 2009, but were denied the hat-trick when India won in 2013. While India have lifted the trophy twice – once in 2013 after beating England in the final and the other in 2002 when they shared the title with Sri Lanka – only Australia have won two ICC Champions Trophy finals. As part of our series looking at the history of each side at the tournament, we revisit Australia’s past performances and key men throughout the years. https://www.icc-cricket.com/champions-trophy/news/379193
bowl_out Posted May 11, 2017 Posted May 11, 2017 They look insanely strong.. Their starting XI might be: Warner Lynn Finch Smith Maxwell Henriques Wade Cummins Starc Hazelwood Zampa
kira Posted May 11, 2017 Posted May 11, 2017 3 minutes ago, bowl_out said: They look insanely strong.. Their starting XI might be: Warner Lynn Finch Smith Maxwell Henriques Wade Cummins Starc Hazelwood Zampa The batting is very destructive but it has no anchor, it will be prone to some collapses, the pace bowling is by far the best in the world, the spin is meh, It's a strong team but don't think it has all the bases covered, will take just one bad match to knock them out of the tournament and that can easily happen with that batting.
bowl_out Posted May 11, 2017 Posted May 11, 2017 5 minutes ago, kira said: The batting is very destructive but it has no anchor, it will be prone to some collapses, the pace bowling is by far the best in the world, the spin is meh, It's a strong team but don't think it has all the bases covered, will take just one bad match to knock them out of the tournament and that can easily happen with that batting. Smith is the anchor... It was almost impossible to get him out.. He has had an average IPL though, but different format.. Agree on the spin part.. Maxwell can chip in, but you don't win matches in England with spin.
Ultimate_Game Posted May 11, 2017 Posted May 11, 2017 2 hours ago, bowl_out said: They look insanely strong.. Their starting XI might be: Warner Lynn Finch Smith Maxwell Henriques Wade Cummins Starc Hazelwood Zampa Replace Henriques with a proper batsman and that's a pretty tough team to beat.
bowl_out Posted May 11, 2017 Posted May 11, 2017 12 minutes ago, Ultimate_Game said: Replace Henriques with a proper batsman and that's a pretty tough team to beat. They need a 5th bowler.. The alternative is Travis Head who can bowl and bat.. But bowling looks weak with two part time spinners
Ultimate_Game Posted May 11, 2017 Posted May 11, 2017 36 minutes ago, bowl_out said: They need a 5th bowler.. The alternative is Travis Head who can bowl and bat.. But bowling looks weak with two part time spinners They have 40 overs covered with Starc, Hazlewood, Cummins and Zampa. The remaining 10 overs can be shared among Maxwell, Henriques (if he plays) and/or someone else. Not that bad IMO especially given the batting which can chase any total or put up 330+. On flattish pitches it would be a nightmare to go up against them
bowl_out Posted May 11, 2017 Posted May 11, 2017 5 minutes ago, Ultimate_Game said: They have 40 overs covered with Starc, Hazlewood, Cummins and Zampa. The remaining 10 overs can be shared among Maxwell, Henriques (if he plays) and/or someone else. Not that bad IMO especially given the batting which can chase any total or put up 330+. On flattish pitches it would be a nightmare to go up against them That's risky.. You can't always expect your batting to get 330+. Like kira said, there are too many hitters in the side, and few anchors.. So, their batting is bound to fail one match and if their bowling fails that match, they are out.
Ultimate_Game Posted May 11, 2017 Posted May 11, 2017 4 minutes ago, bowl_out said: That's risky.. You can't always expect your batting to get 330+. Like kira said, there are too many hitters in the side, and few anchors.. So, their batting is bound to fail one match and if their bowling fails that match, they are out. But how many times do we see matches played on helpful surfaces? Not many and they do bat deep. Too many match winners in that team and on helpful tracks they have the bowling to bowl out opponents cheaply too with likes of Starc, Hazlewood and Cummins in their rank. Quite a solid short format team IMO.
Khota Posted May 14, 2017 Posted May 14, 2017 The only team that could have challenged them was India but the selection is so screwd up that it wont happen. dhoni, rohit and yuvraj all three need to be out for India to win. MCcricket 1
Gollum Posted May 15, 2017 Posted May 15, 2017 Unless they have a bad day in office, no team will challenge them. Very strong team led by modern day Bradman.
CG Posted May 15, 2017 Posted May 15, 2017 Australian batsman will be exposed in England like last time.
Nikhil_cric Posted May 15, 2017 Posted May 15, 2017 I'm not even sure why they are bothering to play Zampa in England. They can go all-out with Starc/Cummins/Haze/Pattinson and get Head/Maxwell to bowl offbreaks. Their batting will certainly be tested if there is some seam/swing on offer but otherwise they are miles ahead of the competition.
Khota Posted May 15, 2017 Posted May 15, 2017 6 hours ago, CG said: Australian batsman will be exposed in England like last time. I disagree. Batting is their strength.
StriKe Posted May 15, 2017 Posted May 15, 2017 How is the weather this time in England? Last time it helped Jadeja a lot.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now