sreesanth U guys are not above God -Sreesanth to BCCI via tweets

[Gollum]

Feel for Sreesanth, looks like he was made a scapegoat after all. 

[Laaloo]

On 8/12/2017 at 4:08 AM, Pollack said:

This is exactly I was looking for. On one hand since CSK was charged only for betting you believe a lot more wasn't in. If asked you ask for credible links. Similarly Sreeesanth due to lack of credible evidence got scot free. So unless you have credible links he hasn't done anything.  

 

Initial reports of Srini involvement. Then it was only Srini's son in law (along with few others) only as an enthusiast. Dhoni, the great, giving false statement. Finally Meiyappan being found guilty of only betting. It is typical case of putting things under the carpet and mellowing things down.

 

I understand Lalit Modi may have some motives against Srinivisan but he would not drag MSD unnecessarily into it because he has nothing against him. AccordingAccording to him read the below:

IPL spot-fixing: CSK skipper Dhoni involved in cover-up, says Lalit Modi

 

 

http://m.timesofindia.com/news/IPL-spot-fixing-CSK-skipper-Dhoni-involved-in-cover-up-says-Lalit-Modi/articleshow/30175290.cms

 

 

Of course no evidence. But it is all shabby. There is strong reason to feel there is lot more than betting( read fixing at least spot fixings) since owners were themselves involved.

 

 

 

Chuskis are in denial

[Vilander]

1 hour ago, Gollum said:

Feel for Sreesanth, looks like he was made a scapegoat after all. 

if he was a mumbai bania he will still be playing.

[cric_fan]

This is exactly I was looking for. On one hand since CSK was charged only for betting you believe a lot more wasn't in. If asked you ask for credible links. Similarly Sreeesanth due to lack of credible evidence got scot free. So unless you have credible links he hasn't done anything.  
 
Initial reports of Srini involvement. Then it was only Srini's son in law (along with few others) only as an enthusiast. Dhoni, the great, giving false statement. Finally Meiyappan being found guilty of only betting. It is typical case of putting things under the carpet and mellowing things down.
 
I understand Lalit Modi may have some motives against Srinivisan but he would not drag MSD unnecessarily into it because he has nothing against him. AccordingAccording to him read the below:

IPL spot-fixing: CSK skipper Dhoni involved in cover-up, says Lalit Modi

 

 

http://m.timesofindia.com/news/IPL-spot-fixing-CSK-skipper-Dhoni-involved-in-cover-up-says-Lalit-Modi/articleshow/30175290.cms
 
 
Of course no evidence. But it is all shabby. There is strong reason to feel there is lot more than betting( read fixing at least spot fixings) since owners were themselves involved.
 
 
 

There is no way that MSD is a fixer. Never.

[someone]

At 34, he doesn't have a cricket career left. He should focus on being a expert like that fixer accused Azhar or Jadeja.....

[Pollack]

8 hours ago, cric_fan said:

 

There is no way that MSD is a fixer. Never.

 

So you haven't read the post. Never implied dhoni is a fixer. 

[Temujin Khaghan]

"then what about csk and Rajasthan"?

 

HahahahahHahahHHHahHHHaaa

 

Nailed it!!!

[Laaloo]

Poor sree.

 

Hasn't been the same since dhoni reprimanded him on the field and cost is our first series win in SA.

 

And then dravid left him hanging with