Jump to content

Who will become ATG batsman after 2018 away tours


Recommended Posts

Posted
33 minutes ago, surajmal said:

proof please. 

What proof? He was MoM (scored 160) in our only win in NZ after 1976. Top scored (193) when India won a match in England in 2002. Top scored (91) when we won in England in 2007. 117 in WI when India won a test after 26 years in WI. Scored 71 in Perth test that India won and there were no hundreds in that match. He missed out in 2 wins in SA and 1 Adelaide win. Out of 8 win, he was top scorer in 4 and did well in 5.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Trichromatic said:

What proof? He was MoM in our only win in NZ after 1976 after scoring 160. Top scored (193) when India won a match in England in 2002. Top scored (91) when we won in England in 2007. 117 in WI when India won a test after 26 years in WI. Scored 71 in Perth test that India won and there were no hundreds in that match. He missed out in 2 wins in SA and 1 Adelaide win. Out of 8 win, he was top scorer in 4 and did well in 5.

194* in Multan as well. Also got a hundred in our only away win in the 90s against Lanka.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Trichromatic said:

What proof? He was MoM in our only win in NZ after 1976 after scoring 160. Top scored (193) when India won a match in England in 2002. Top scored (91) when we won in England in 2007. 117 in WI when India won a test after 26 years in WI. Scored 71 in Perth test that India won and there were no hundreds in that match. He missed out in 2 wins in SA and 1 Adelaide win. Out of 8 win, he was top scorer in 4 and did well in 5.

but only won MoM in one match... 

Posted

All our top order batsmen have the pedigree and technique to succeed in overseas conditions. The major hurdles are all in the mind. Our guys have the weight on their shoulders to register the first ever series wins in south Africa and Australia. They should back themselves and remember that the opposition bowling attacks are just as wary about our batsmen.

Posted

Kohli will do better than sachin.. Thats for sure :yahoo: Standards he set are really low won't be surprised if Dhawan can over take him:hehe: in away tours.

Posted
2 hours ago, Rasgulla said:

Kohli will do better than sachin.. Thats for sure :yahoo: Standards he set are really low won't be surprised if Dhawan can over take him:hehe: in away tours.

Thanks for clarifying . As we were not sure your views on Sachin . Would i guess you don’t rate Sachin ?:phehe:

Posted
6 hours ago, Gollum said:

Do you seriously rate Kohli the test batter above Vijay? I can understand about Pujara because he flopped in the previous batch of overseas assignments. But come on you can't be serious, don't be a slave to mundane statistics, else Miandad will come out looking better than King Viv !!!!

vijay and rahane are better than kohli and chepu abroad.

Posted

I like Vijay but feel that he is being a little over-rated off late. Going by the narrative, it would seem that he has a Amarnath-like record overseas. He averages less than Sehwag outside the sub-con FFS. Should definitely be picked ahead of Dhawan though.

Posted
21 minutes ago, Vijy said:

vijay and rahane are better than kohli and chepu abroad.

Agree but KT thinks otherwise, he is living in a fantasy world. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Jimmy Cliff said:

I like Vijay but feel that he is being a little over-rated off late. Going by the narrative, it would seem that he has a Amarnath-like record overseas. He averages less than Sehwag outside the sub-con FFS. Should definitely be picked ahead of Dhawan though.

vijay has always been a patchy player. I think he did better from 2014 onwards. using the above link and adjusting to Jan 2014 onwards, vijay has avg 41 which is good for an opener. of course he's not amarnath, dravid or rahane but these stats are very good for an opener in mostly challenging conditions.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Jimmy Cliff said:

I like Vijay but feel that he is being a little over-rated off late. Going by the narrative, it would seem that he has a Amarnath-like record overseas. He averages less than Sehwag outside the sub-con FFS. Should definitely be picked ahead of Dhawan though.

Remove WI and he is better than Viru. Will further improve once this cycle is over. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Gollum said:

Agree but KT thinks otherwise, he is living in a fantasy world. 

to each their own...fantasy. people will point to kohli's stats not realizing that in oz, nz and even sa (to some extent), he mostly got flat tracks to feast on. Eng and WI had more challenging pitches (although WI has a crap bowling attack) and his record there reflects his true ability. similarly, on real turners, barring a few innings he has not done much of note. would pick jinx ahead of him abroad and chepu in SC.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Gollum said:

Remove WI and he is better than Viru. Will further improve once this cycle is over. 

I don't think WI pitches are easy to bat on, although their bowling is a joke. arguably it was slightly better when veeru played.

Posted
10 minutes ago, Vijy said:

vijay has always been a patchy player. I think he did better from 2014 onwards. using the above link and adjusting to Jan 2014 onwards, vijay has avg 41 which is good for an opener. of course he's not amarnath, dravid or rahane but these stats are very good for an opener in mostly challenging conditions.

He was indeed very good in the last overseas cycle which is why he should be first choice along with Rahul. But I don't understand how he's better than Kohli overseas. Better in England? Sure. But otherwise Kohli is well ahead everywhere else.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Jimmy Cliff said:

He was indeed very good in the last overseas cycle which is why he should be first choice along with Rahul. But I don't understand how he's better than Kohli overseas. Better in England? Sure. But otherwise Kohli is well ahead everywhere else.

a lot of it is down to kohli's merrymaking in Oz. and the eqn is very diff for an opener vs #4. On tough pitches overseas, I'd rate Rahane and vijay higher than kohli.

Posted
19 minutes ago, Gollum said:

Remove WI and he is better than Viru. Will further improve once this cycle is over. 

But why remove WI? Sehwag played them in 2006 when they weren't completely hopeless like they're right now. In any case, I hope he improves further in this cycle as that would mean India being much more competitive.

Posted
1 minute ago, Jimmy Cliff said:

But why remove WI? Sehwag played them in 2006 when they weren't completely hopeless like they're right now. In any case, I hope he improves further in this cycle as that would mean India being much more competitive.

I agree. it's what I said above too.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...