Trichromatic Posted December 17, 2017 Posted December 17, 2017 33 minutes ago, surajmal said: proof please. What proof? He was MoM (scored 160) in our only win in NZ after 1976. Top scored (193) when India won a match in England in 2002. Top scored (91) when we won in England in 2007. 117 in WI when India won a test after 26 years in WI. Scored 71 in Perth test that India won and there were no hundreds in that match. He missed out in 2 wins in SA and 1 Adelaide win. Out of 8 win, he was top scorer in 4 and did well in 5. Gollum 1
Jimmy Cliff Posted December 17, 2017 Posted December 17, 2017 4 minutes ago, Trichromatic said: What proof? He was MoM in our only win in NZ after 1976 after scoring 160. Top scored (193) when India won a match in England in 2002. Top scored (91) when we won in England in 2007. 117 in WI when India won a test after 26 years in WI. Scored 71 in Perth test that India won and there were no hundreds in that match. He missed out in 2 wins in SA and 1 Adelaide win. Out of 8 win, he was top scorer in 4 and did well in 5. 194* in Multan as well. Also got a hundred in our only away win in the 90s against Lanka.
surajmal Posted December 17, 2017 Posted December 17, 2017 7 minutes ago, Trichromatic said: What proof? He was MoM in our only win in NZ after 1976 after scoring 160. Top scored (193) when India won a match in England in 2002. Top scored (91) when we won in England in 2007. 117 in WI when India won a test after 26 years in WI. Scored 71 in Perth test that India won and there were no hundreds in that match. He missed out in 2 wins in SA and 1 Adelaide win. Out of 8 win, he was top scorer in 4 and did well in 5. but only won MoM in one match...
Trichromatic Posted December 17, 2017 Posted December 17, 2017 5 minutes ago, surajmal said: but only won MoM in one match... and?
King Tendulkar Posted December 17, 2017 Author Posted December 17, 2017 Why are we discussing tendulkar in this thread
Temujin Khaghan Posted December 17, 2017 Posted December 17, 2017 All our top order batsmen have the pedigree and technique to succeed in overseas conditions. The major hurdles are all in the mind. Our guys have the weight on their shoulders to register the first ever series wins in south Africa and Australia. They should back themselves and remember that the opposition bowling attacks are just as wary about our batsmen.
Rasgulla Posted December 17, 2017 Posted December 17, 2017 Kohli will do better than sachin.. Thats for sure Standards he set are really low won't be surprised if Dhawan can over take him in away tours.
King Tendulkar Posted December 17, 2017 Author Posted December 17, 2017 2 hours ago, Rasgulla said: Kohli will do better than sachin.. Thats for sure Standards he set are really low won't be surprised if Dhawan can over take him in away tours. Thanks for clarifying . As we were not sure your views on Sachin . Would i guess you don’t rate Sachin ?
Vijy Posted December 17, 2017 Posted December 17, 2017 6 hours ago, Gollum said: Do you seriously rate Kohli the test batter above Vijay? I can understand about Pujara because he flopped in the previous batch of overseas assignments. But come on you can't be serious, don't be a slave to mundane statistics, else Miandad will come out looking better than King Viv !!!! vijay and rahane are better than kohli and chepu abroad.
Jimmy Cliff Posted December 17, 2017 Posted December 17, 2017 I like Vijay but feel that he is being a little over-rated off late. Going by the narrative, it would seem that he has a Amarnath-like record overseas. He averages less than Sehwag outside the sub-con FFS. Should definitely be picked ahead of Dhawan though.
Gollum Posted December 17, 2017 Posted December 17, 2017 21 minutes ago, Vijy said: vijay and rahane are better than kohli and chepu abroad. Agree but KT thinks otherwise, he is living in a fantasy world.
Vijy Posted December 17, 2017 Posted December 17, 2017 1 minute ago, Jimmy Cliff said: I like Vijay but feel that he is being a little over-rated off late. Going by the narrative, it would seem that he has a Amarnath-like record overseas. He averages less than Sehwag outside the sub-con FFS. Should definitely be picked ahead of Dhawan though. vijay has always been a patchy player. I think he did better from 2014 onwards. using the above link and adjusting to Jan 2014 onwards, vijay has avg 41 which is good for an opener. of course he's not amarnath, dravid or rahane but these stats are very good for an opener in mostly challenging conditions.
Gollum Posted December 17, 2017 Posted December 17, 2017 3 minutes ago, Jimmy Cliff said: I like Vijay but feel that he is being a little over-rated off late. Going by the narrative, it would seem that he has a Amarnath-like record overseas. He averages less than Sehwag outside the sub-con FFS. Should definitely be picked ahead of Dhawan though. Remove WI and he is better than Viru. Will further improve once this cycle is over.
Vijy Posted December 17, 2017 Posted December 17, 2017 2 minutes ago, Gollum said: Agree but KT thinks otherwise, he is living in a fantasy world. to each their own...fantasy. people will point to kohli's stats not realizing that in oz, nz and even sa (to some extent), he mostly got flat tracks to feast on. Eng and WI had more challenging pitches (although WI has a crap bowling attack) and his record there reflects his true ability. similarly, on real turners, barring a few innings he has not done much of note. would pick jinx ahead of him abroad and chepu in SC. Gollum 1
Vijy Posted December 17, 2017 Posted December 17, 2017 2 minutes ago, Gollum said: Remove WI and he is better than Viru. Will further improve once this cycle is over. I don't think WI pitches are easy to bat on, although their bowling is a joke. arguably it was slightly better when veeru played.
Jimmy Cliff Posted December 17, 2017 Posted December 17, 2017 10 minutes ago, Vijy said: vijay has always been a patchy player. I think he did better from 2014 onwards. using the above link and adjusting to Jan 2014 onwards, vijay has avg 41 which is good for an opener. of course he's not amarnath, dravid or rahane but these stats are very good for an opener in mostly challenging conditions. He was indeed very good in the last overseas cycle which is why he should be first choice along with Rahul. But I don't understand how he's better than Kohli overseas. Better in England? Sure. But otherwise Kohli is well ahead everywhere else.
Vijy Posted December 17, 2017 Posted December 17, 2017 8 minutes ago, Jimmy Cliff said: He was indeed very good in the last overseas cycle which is why he should be first choice along with Rahul. But I don't understand how he's better than Kohli overseas. Better in England? Sure. But otherwise Kohli is well ahead everywhere else. a lot of it is down to kohli's merrymaking in Oz. and the eqn is very diff for an opener vs #4. On tough pitches overseas, I'd rate Rahane and vijay higher than kohli.
Jimmy Cliff Posted December 17, 2017 Posted December 17, 2017 19 minutes ago, Gollum said: Remove WI and he is better than Viru. Will further improve once this cycle is over. But why remove WI? Sehwag played them in 2006 when they weren't completely hopeless like they're right now. In any case, I hope he improves further in this cycle as that would mean India being much more competitive.
Vijy Posted December 17, 2017 Posted December 17, 2017 1 minute ago, Jimmy Cliff said: But why remove WI? Sehwag played them in 2006 when they weren't completely hopeless like they're right now. In any case, I hope he improves further in this cycle as that would mean India being much more competitive. I agree. it's what I said above too. Jimmy Cliff 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now