Is Indian cricket missing out on extra viewership by picking an ODI team bereft of the new-age entertaining stroke players ?

[Jimmy Cliff]

2 hours ago, speedheat said:

Thought it would be that Bot or velu but its  a sensible poster  jimmy cliff !! Disappointing

Just some gallows humour man.

[Nikhil_cric]

51 minutes ago, express bowling said:

 

This has been going on for a long time now.   Not just a few  months.

 

So, it doesn't seem to be that obvious to the decision makers.   Even during Kumble's  regime, we saw Gambhir, Yuvi and Parthiv play.  Preferring experienced players has been the norm for quite some time.

We don't know how much say kumble had in the selections though.

[express bowling]

1 minute ago, Nikhil_cric said:

We don't know how much say kumble had in the selections though.

 

Read Kumble's interview after Duleep Trophy 2016, which he was watching from the ground, when he enthusiastically talked about the current form of Gambhir and Yuvi.

 

There are a  lot of people involved with Indian cricket now, who beleive that experience is the key.

[Stan AF]

Who is that one guy that voted for the 2nd option?.

[diga]

2 hours ago, UnknownGenius said:

I can't vote but If I'm allowed I'm voting for 2nd option. Indian ODI viewership is high because of MSD and other players who have won big time like Jadhav, Rayudu, Jdeja etc

Test viewership is nothing without mSD and co

Another Chuski