singhprakash72 Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 Ishant and Umesh should be only considered for test. He has good stamina for test and is ok to give few boundary balls but in ODI he may get slaughtered. UrmiSinhaRay 1 Link to comment
kruiser Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 4 hours ago, rkt.india said: if we keep bringing all under-performing players against minnows then how are we going to test and try new players and develop them. If we want to build a great team, we need to be less emotional about current players and objectively should always try to find new players and see if they can help build that great team. I was thinking the same thing. What is point of playing WI if you do not bring out your bench and potentials into playing XI. None of the established bowlers should be there and may be one or 2 established bats. UrmiSinhaRay and express bowling 1 1 Link to comment
Lannister Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 At this rate, I will not be surprised if Ishant comes back to ODIs. Even after 2015 world cup disaster, we are still playing the same set of players 4 years down the line. Jadeja, Umesh, Dhoni, Kumar... Link to comment
Ankit_sharma03 Posted October 17, 2018 Share Posted October 17, 2018 cnt agree more jst add he was always a good test bowler in Indian conditions but rest always remained same UrmiSinhaRay 1 Link to comment
tweaker Posted October 17, 2018 Share Posted October 17, 2018 Again the selection committee played safe by picking Umesh instead of Sairaj, Saini etc. But better decision than the selection of Kaul ,Chahar. UrmiSinhaRay, speedheat, express bowling and 2 others 1 4 Link to comment
Adi BB Posted October 18, 2018 Share Posted October 18, 2018 On 10/16/2018 at 7:46 PM, express bowling said: Umesh is not the ideal bowler for ODIs ... but still better than Shardul, Kaul and Chahar. Atleast he can take wickets, although he is likely to be more expensive than is ideal. True ,as average as umesh is in odis he still is much better than those options . Umesh has 1.4 wkts per match @32 which is not bad at all ,it's only the death bowling which has been his bane UrmiSinhaRay, Mosher and express bowling 3 Link to comment
vishalvirsingh Posted October 18, 2018 Share Posted October 18, 2018 On 10/16/2018 at 6:02 PM, speedheat said: Link The All-India Senior Selection Committee has named Umesh Yadav as Shardul Thakur’s replacement in India’s squad for the first two ODIs against Windies. Mr Thakur suffered a right adductor tendon injury and has been ruled out of the Paytm ODI series. Possibly ruled out for Australia series too. I think hardik kedar and shardul are ruled out of Australian tour due to injury. Hanuma could play as only spinner batsman along with 4 pacers in Australia or may be ash and hanuma and 3 pacers. UrmiSinhaRay 1 Link to comment
vishalvirsingh Posted October 18, 2018 Share Posted October 18, 2018 18 minutes ago, Adi BB said: True ,as average as umesh is in odis he still is much better than those options . Umesh has 1.4 wkts per match @32 which is not bad at all ,it's only the death bowling which has been his bane So many new pacers are on view tbey could have been selected and kinda trained at least. There is no point selecting umesh and then sitting him on bench as I think khaleel and shammi may play with 3 spinners. Umesh ...even a kid knows is suited for test n not short games..he has never succeeded big-time in odi or t20....I don't think he will succeed much in odi...may be he gets wickets but will be expensive. express bowling and UrmiSinhaRay 2 Link to comment
Rasgulla Posted October 21, 2018 Share Posted October 21, 2018 Ghantaaaa yadav But phastttttttttt Nikola and UrmiSinhaRay 1 1 Link to comment
Rasgulla Posted October 21, 2018 Share Posted October 21, 2018 6 minutes ago, UnknownGenius said: Useless bowler in ODI. Phaaaast but braindead People here have no clue about cricket - unnecessarily overhyping phaaast bowlers like Yadav and Aaron who repeatedly come short in internation ODI cricket and T20 cricket Deepak Chahar way better than these two for these formats They ll go hiding when he does like ****. They ll show up when he gets a wic once in 10 games That's why no one gives a * about their mohalla opinion. Nikola 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now