Khota Posted February 20, 2019 Author Posted February 20, 2019 15 minutes ago, zen said: You did. Pandya plays well in bouncy conditions. The series was won because of how Pujara batted so we would not have lost it Don't waste my time with such posts. Thanks! You are the one who has no respect for time. 10K word essay about a players value to the team when the team is winning handily without any contribution from him. Things that make you go hmmm..
Khota Posted February 20, 2019 Author Posted February 20, 2019 17 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: SL is one the most poorest team and we are one of the best side, Aus side perfomance will depend on opp Facing bumrah is diff to facing rajitha or fernando So it has more to do with India. Correct
zen Posted February 20, 2019 Posted February 20, 2019 1 minute ago, Khota said: You are the one who has no respect for time. 10K word essay about a players value to the team when the team is winning handily without any contribution from him. Things that make you go hmmm.. I wrote it per the request by ICF for an article for its homepage .... I have time for ICF (not for pointless arguments) .... if you have something meaningful, let me know
Khota Posted February 21, 2019 Author Posted February 21, 2019 6 hours ago, zen said: I wrote it per the request by ICF for an article for its homepage .... I have time for ICF (not for pointless arguments) .... if you have something meaningful, let me know I thank you for your contribution to ICF and writing a article. I just don't happen to agree with it. Rightarmfast 1
philcric Posted February 21, 2019 Posted February 21, 2019 (edited) http://www.espncricinfo.com/series/18913/scorecard/1158066/west-indies-vs-england-1st-odi-england-tour-of-wi-2018-19 Ben Stokes 8-0-37-3 Jason Holder 9.4-0-63-2 Edited February 21, 2019 by philcric
Ankit_sharma03 Posted February 21, 2019 Posted February 21, 2019 15 hours ago, Khota said: So it has more to do with India. Correct it has to do with 2 sides, a game is played by 2 sides not one . ENG n SA far better sides then AUS To hell with No pandya logic in AUS, vihari n rohit didnt do anything extra so had pandya played we still wud have won. Remeber we lost in england last test when even vihari played
ShoonyaSifar Posted February 21, 2019 Posted February 21, 2019 5 hours ago, philcric said: http://www.espncricinfo.com/series/18913/scorecard/1158066/west-indies-vs-england-1st-odi-england-tour-of-wi-2018-19 Ben Stokes 8-0-37-3 Jason Holder 9.4-0-63-2 Pandya 45(22) and 8.1-0-50-2 in his last ODI. Not sure what those numbers from Holder and Stokes prove.
Khota Posted February 21, 2019 Author Posted February 21, 2019 8 hours ago, philcric said: http://www.espncricinfo.com/series/18913/scorecard/1158066/west-indies-vs-england-1st-odi-england-tour-of-wi-2018-19 Ben Stokes 8-0-37-3 Jason Holder 9.4-0-63-2 Like I mentioned before weak team will always have need for these utility players.
Khota Posted February 21, 2019 Author Posted February 21, 2019 3 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: it has to do with 2 sides, a game is played by 2 sides not one . ENG n SA far better sides then AUS To hell with No pandya logic in AUS, vihari n rohit didnt do anything extra so had pandya played we still wud have won. Remeber we lost in england last test when even vihari played In Australia, Roos are as formidable as they get. England is a weak team and SA rankings are up because India did not show up.
Ankit_sharma03 Posted February 21, 2019 Posted February 21, 2019 1 hour ago, Khota said: In Australia, Roos are as formidable as they get. England is a weak team and SA rankings are up because India did not show up.
zen Posted February 21, 2019 Posted February 21, 2019 2 hours ago, Khota said: Like I mentioned before weak team will always have need for these utility players. /thread philcric 1
Tibarn Posted February 21, 2019 Posted February 21, 2019 Dhoni is an allrounder,or was, Batsman + Wicketkeeper BOOM!!!
philcric Posted February 21, 2019 Posted February 21, 2019 3 hours ago, Khota said: Like I mentioned before weak team will always have need for these utility players. England is ranked #1 in the world in ODIs. Last I checked Stokes, Moeen and Woakes play for England. I bet you'll now say you don't believe in ICC rankings, they are not done right, and someone else has to mathematically prove it to you that England is not a weak ODI team.
zen Posted February 21, 2019 Posted February 21, 2019 (edited) 15 minutes ago, philcric said: England is ranked #1 in the world in ODIs. Last I checked Stokes, Moeen and Woakes play for England. I bet you'll now say you don't believe in ICC rankings, they are not done right, and someone else has to mathematically prove it to you that England is not a weak ODI team. Let's make it simple - only ATG teams are strong (and many of them played ARs too) ..... Since all other teams are weak (including the ones currently playing relative to ATG teams), the discussion is closed, i.e. all current teams need utility (AR) players (and therefore ARs exist too) Edited February 21, 2019 by zen philcric 1
Khota Posted February 22, 2019 Author Posted February 22, 2019 10 hours ago, philcric said: England is ranked #1 in the world in ODIs. Last I checked Stokes, Moeen and Woakes play for England. I bet you'll now say you don't believe in ICC rankings, they are not done right, and someone else has to mathematically prove it to you that England is not a weak ODI team. What is their Test ranking as that was being discussed?
philcric Posted February 22, 2019 Posted February 22, 2019 (edited) 2 hours ago, Khota said: What is their Test ranking as that was being discussed? No. On 2/21/2019 at 9:47 AM, philcric said: http://www.espncricinfo.com/series/18913/scorecard/1158066/west-indies-vs-england-1st-odi-england-tour-of-wi-2018-19 Ben Stokes 8-0-37-3 Jason Holder 9.4-0-63-2 16 hours ago, Khota said: Like I mentioned before weak team will always have need for these utility players. PS: Eng was ranked higher than Aus in Tests when India played both of these countries in the last 8 months or so. Edited February 22, 2019 by philcric
ShoonyaSifar Posted February 22, 2019 Posted February 22, 2019 Andrew Flintoff after first 25 tests - 971 runs@24 and 41 wickets@50 Shouldn't he have been thrown out for not being good enough
philcric Posted February 22, 2019 Posted February 22, 2019 (edited) utility noun the state of being useful, profitable, or beneficial. adjective useful, especially through being able to perform several functions. Edited February 22, 2019 by philcric
Khota Posted March 2, 2019 Author Posted March 2, 2019 Proof is in the pudding. Is it a coincidence? I doubt it. BOWLING O M R W ECON 0s 4s 6s WD NB Mohammed Shami 10 2 44 2 4.40 38 4 1 2 0 JJ Bumrah 10 0 60 2 6.00 35 10 0 1 0 V Shankar 3 0 22 0 7.33 10 4 0 2 0 Kuldeep Yadav 10 0 46 2 4.60 31 3 1 0 0 RA Jadeja 10 0 33 0 3.30 34 2 0 0 0 KM Jadhav 7 0 31 1 4.42 21 3 0 0 0
Ankit_sharma03 Posted March 2, 2019 Posted March 2, 2019 19 minutes ago, Khota said: Proof is in the pudding. Is it a coincidence? I doubt it. BOWLING O M R W ECON 0s 4s 6s WD NB Mohammed Shami 10 2 44 2 4.40 38 4 1 2 0 JJ Bumrah 10 0 60 2 6.00 35 10 0 1 0 V Shankar 3 0 22 0 7.33 10 4 0 2 0 Kuldeep Yadav 10 0 46 2 4.60 31 3 1 0 0 RA Jadeja 10 0 33 0 3.30 34 2 0 0 0 KM Jadhav 7 0 31 1 4.42 21 3 0 0 0 1st t20- BOWLING O M R W ECON 0s 4s 6s WD NB JJ Bumrah 4 0 16 3 4.00 18 3 0 0 0 YS Chahal 4 0 28 1 7.00 11 3 1 0 0 UT Yadav 4 0 35 0 8.75 8 5 0 2 0 KH Pandya 4 0 17 1 4.25 8 0 0 0 0 M Markande 4 0 31 0 7.75 6 2 1 0 0 2nd t20- BOWLING O M R W ECON 0s 4s 6s WD NB V Shankar 4 0 38 2 9.50 10 6 1 1 0 JJ Bumrah 4 0 30 0 7.50 6 2 1 0 0 S Kaul 3.4 0 45 1 12.27 6 3 3 0 1 YS Chahal 4 0 47 0 11.75 2 2 3 2 0 KH Pandya 4 0 33 0 8.25 6 3 1 1 0 why did u went missing those days
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now