Jinnah, Iqbal and blasphemy

[Sgattick10]

10 minutes ago, Gollum said:

Again not a Pakistan specific problem. Blasphemy, apostasy, inter-religion marriage, LGBT rights...common thread. 

What about India..no survey done? 

[Gollum]

1 minute ago, Sgattick10 said:

What about India..no survey done? 

Yup. PEW must expand the horizon next time. 

[mishra]

1 hour ago, Gollum said:

Again not a Pakistan specific problem. Blasphemy, apostasy, inter-religion marriage, LGBT rights...common thread. 

Gold Buscuit percentage(99.999) want Sharia. Not wanting Sharia is akin to not following religion.

Impurity 0.001% will be stoned publicly.

[mishra]

Oh man, Just read first page of Rangeelaa Rasool where he tears apart in one para whole chutiyaap of people making comparisons with other religions. TBH, never ever thought that way. Someone had some balls to write and publish it.

 

@Gollum

[coffee_rules]

1 hour ago, Gollum said:

Yup. PEW must expand the horizon next time. 

This has got to be a joke. PEW thinks, it is not safe for them to ask religious questions in India. Load of BS.

 

https://www.americanbazaaronline.com/2013/05/12/pew-research-ignored-muslims-in-india-says-indian-muslims-are-dangerous/

Quote

Pew’s answer to why it excluded India from the survey – which encompassed a total of 39 countries comprising 67 percent of the world’s Muslim population – doesn’t make sense.

According to a report on their website, Pew explains India, China and Saudi Arabia were excluded because they “could not safely and reliably conduct face-to-face interviews on religion.”

Pew says countries were excluded “primarily due to cultural and political sensitivities associated with the topics of religious identity and belief. In such environments, the quality of data may be undermined if respondents do not feel free to express their true opinions. In addition, the safety of interviewers may be at risk if the survey meets objections from local residents or authorities.

If India, the most secular country in the world, a progressive democracy and developing economic powerhouse, is considered a problem for a Pew questioner from favorably viewed ally America, who, if they had indeed surveyed India, would have used most likely a local surveyor, who would most likely be a Muslim himself or herself, then how come they determined that the likes of Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran and Syria is less dangerous for their employees to conduct face-to-face survey questions on religion, politics and society?

Whether it is the Indian government which stopped Pew from conducting a survey, or Pew’s own lack of resources or inability to handle a complicated country like India, the fact remains that to call such a survey ‘The World’s Muslims’ is a fallacy, a study that deserves to be ignored

Pew considers India less safer than Syria or Afghanistan. 

[Gollum]

1 hour ago, coffee_rules said:

This has got to be a joke. PEW thinks, it is not safe for them to ask religious questions in India. Load of BS.

 

https://www.americanbazaaronline.com/2013/05/12/pew-research-ignored-muslims-in-india-says-indian-muslims-are-dangerous/

Pew considers India less safer than Syria or Afghanistan. 

Wow, didn't know that. 

[Gollum]

1 hour ago, mishra said:

Oh man, Just read first page of Rangeelaa Rasool where he tears apart in one para whole chutiyaap of people making comparisons with other religions. TBH, never ever thought that way. Someone had some balls to write and publish it.

 

@Gollum

Will read it later and give my review. 

[coffee_rules]

As expected, rectums get accolades 

 

 

[Alam_dar]

''When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty''

 

There is no way possible to reform Islam by staying within it's boundaries. 

 

[coffee_rules]

Sometimes I feel we should be thankful to Sir Syed, Iqbal, Jinnah for their two-nation theory to take away most of the filth. Who can deal with such monstrosity? @zen

Man vs Infidel Environment 

Edited August 9, 2020 by coffee_rules

[zen]

53 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

Sometimes I feel we should be thankful to Sir Syed, Iqbal, Jinnah for their two-nation theory to take away most of the filth. Who can deal with such monstrosity? @zen

Man vs Infidel Environment 

Sad to see that. 

 

As for partition, I have no problems with it. World borders keep changing every 60-70 years or so. What is surprising is that despite the region being home to religions such as Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism, and so on, some people feel/felt the need to adapt to foreign religions. That India has not been able to be a Mecca/Vatican for these religions for people who practise them all over the globe is another set back. Sadly, many people do not even realize the opportunity lost to be a philosophical/religious leader. Over the years, India has also misused secularism - it does not necessarily mean shying away from your religion but being allowed to practise your own religion including promoting it if it matters. 

[Singh bling]

On 8/9/2020 at 9:14 PM, coffee_rules said:

Sometimes I feel we should be thankful to Sir Syed, Iqbal, Jinnah for their two-nation theory to take away most of the filth. Who can deal with such monstrosity? @zen

Man vs Infidel Environment 

There was no point of rag tag partition. Muslims were 23% when they divided india. It will take the another 50 year to reach this percentage. The progressive Hindu's will have fewer children and old populationwhich which means Muslims will rule in street fights. 

 

Direct action day will be repeated and they will demand another nation. Gandhi and Nehru practically destroyed future of hindu's .

 

After WW2 the the borders of Europe were redrawn and large number of people were expelled. This solved Europe's problem permanently. That was the correct way of partition. India just pushed the conflict 100-200 years away which is inevitable

Edited August 10, 2020 by Singh bling