rkt.india Posted April 19, 2019 Share Posted April 19, 2019 8 hours ago, vvvslaxman said: Average speed of Holder, Grande homme, Keemo Paul, Matthews, Phelu and bunch of others bowlers is slower than average speed of Shankar who could reach upto 134 kph. Stokes bowls fast. He is their main bowler. Look at his career ER. 6.13. He bowls mostly in bowler friendly condition. He gets thwacked by every tom dick and harry in all formats. FIrst of all your premise of "If you bowl fast they won't be tempted to attack" is flat out wrong. Most expensive fast bowlers in the last couple of years (100 balls min) Jerome Taylor ER 7.00 (fast bowler) Oshane Thomas ER 7.22 (fast bowler) Taskin Ahmed ER 7.43 (fast bowler) Olivier 6.52 (fast bowler) Stokes 6.23 (fast bowler) Even Starc was going around 5.75. It is an assumption fast bowlers won't be hit around. Amir a trundler, Faheem a trundler, Mathews trundler, Mustafizur a trundler, Grandhomme a trundler all go under 5 runs per over in the last 2 years Amir and faheem are trundler since when? Switchblade and zen 2 Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted April 19, 2019 Share Posted April 19, 2019 10 minutes ago, rkt.india said: Amir and faheem are trundler since when? They are now. Once in a while hitting 140k won't make them fast bowlers. His average speed was somewhere in the early 130s in the recent series. Link to comment
rkt.india Posted April 19, 2019 Share Posted April 19, 2019 43 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: They are now. Once in a while hitting 140k won't make them fast bowlers. His average speed was somewhere in the early 130s in the recent series. Aamir trundles in tests, not in ODIs. Faheem also bowls 135-145 kph that is fast medium. Even mustafizur isn't a trundler. Link to comment
urnotserious Posted April 24, 2019 Share Posted April 24, 2019 Saini is the second best bowler behind Bumrah in this current set up. Too bad he isn't included over Shami and hit me Bhuvi. rock777 and zen 1 1 Link to comment
Nikola Posted April 24, 2019 Share Posted April 24, 2019 15 minutes ago, urnotserious said: Saini is the second best bowler behind Bumrah in this current set up. Too bad he isn't included over Shami and hit me Bhuvi. No need to include in place of shami or bhuvi. We surely needed 4 pacers when we gonna play 10+ matches. Mosher 1 Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted April 24, 2019 Share Posted April 24, 2019 SHami has been seriously good. We cannot go exclusively by his ability to restrict. Shami is a wicket taker. You need wicket taker. Not "containing bowlers". Teams will eventually figure out a way. All Saini does is bowling short. Some can't slog him. Link to comment
bowl_out Posted April 24, 2019 Share Posted April 24, 2019 Saini should have been in the squad instead of DK Link to comment
rkt.india Posted April 25, 2019 Share Posted April 25, 2019 4 hours ago, vvvslaxman said: SHami has been seriously good. We cannot go exclusively by his ability to restrict. Shami is a wicket taker. You need wicket taker. Not "containing bowlers". Teams will eventually figure out a way. All Saini does is bowling short. Some can't slog him. T20 cricket is all about defensive bowling. Some of the best t20 bowlers are defensive bowlers like malinga, narine. Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted April 25, 2019 Share Posted April 25, 2019 1 minute ago, rkt.india said: T20 cricket is all about defensive bowling. Some of the best t20 bowlers are defensive bowlers like malinga, narine. Malinga and Narine are both wicket takers also defensive bowlers. Saini is mostly a defensive bowler due to his length. Besides we are talking about one-dayer. He is definitely better than Shami or even Bhuvi. Link to comment
rkt.india Posted April 25, 2019 Share Posted April 25, 2019 9 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: Malinga and Narine are both wicket takers also defensive bowlers. Saini is mostly a defensive bowler due to his length. Besides we are talking about one-dayer. He is definitely better than Shami or even Bhuvi. They take wickets because of their defebsive bowling skills. Also regarding Nariane, he was a chucker, took huge advantage of that and has done zlich this IPL in terms of wickets. Link to comment
Ankit_sharma03 Posted April 25, 2019 Author Share Posted April 25, 2019 2 hours ago, vvvslaxman said: Malinga and Narine are both wicket takers also defensive bowlers. Saini is mostly a defensive bowler due to his length. Besides we are talking about one-dayer. He is definitely better than Shami or even Bhuvi. narine was a wkt take only in t20s coz batsman use to attack him, in odi they use to milk for him singles n doubles who is better then shami ? Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted April 25, 2019 Share Posted April 25, 2019 6 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: narine was a wkt take only in t20s coz batsman use to attack him, in odi they use to milk for him singles n doubles who is better then shami ? Sorry NOT better than. Saini is not better than Shami or Bhuvi Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted May 17, 2019 Share Posted May 17, 2019 Jasprit Bumrah keeps Dinesh Karthik, Ambati Rayudu in all-time Mumbai Indians XI Jasprit Bumrah’s all-time MI XI: Rohit Sharma, Sachin Tendulkar, Ambati Rayudu, Dinesh Karthik (wk), Hardik Pandya, Kieron Pollard, Krunal Pandya, Harbhajan Singh, Lasith Malinga, Mitchell Johnson, Jasprit Bumrah. https://sportscafe.in/articles/cricket/2019/may/17/jasprit-bumrah-puts-together-his-all-time-favourite-mumbai-indians-xi-team Rayudu has supplied biriyani to entire India team Link to comment
aditya19 Posted May 18, 2019 Share Posted May 18, 2019 saini is overrated...khaleel was bowling well in the ipl but not sure of his stamina for odi's Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now