Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Gadkari behaviour and body language has been odd to say the least. His interviews before the result and his reactions after the results shows a man undergoing a shock and some serious calculations. 

 

Did he really buy into the story of being PM candidate in case BJP didn’t get the numbers ?

Posted (edited)

Nothing wrong in showing Modi-Shah are not the only two coming up ideas for India. He rose in stature in BJP, now that Jaitley is out sick and he is projected as #3 in the party. He is not a divider like other insignificant leaders like Yashwant Sinha. 

Edited by coffee_rules
Posted

He is preferable for certain parts of the country, he is not agressive like Modi/Shaw his time will come and there is a specific role for him to play. 

Posted

2002 was litmus test for BJP. Till then the cracks in leadership was never that public. Vajpayee wanted Modi out. Advani/Bal Thackerey backed him. Rest of the young uns were running helter-skelter not sure whom to follow. In a way, loss in 2004 was blamed on Modi. After 2009, there was big hole in leadership and BJP adopted the Gujrat model to come back triumph. 

Posted
12 hours ago, Vilander said:

He is preferable for certain parts of the country, he is not agressive like Modi/Shaw his time will come and there is a specific role for him to play. 

Thats a myth. Delhi media will always paint a incomplete image

×
×
  • Create New...