India’s best chokers

[Pollack]

39 minutes ago, mishra said:

Instead we decided to bring in another keeper as main bat as if 2 weren't good enough to keep.

Another keeper was brought in as a specialist batsman who has a power game too since it was far too much on Pandya's shoulder. Being a Dhoni fan, you'll always have issues with Pant getting in.

[mishra]

14 minutes ago, Pollack said:

Another keeper was brought in as a specialist batsman who has a power game too since it was far too much on Pandya's shoulder. Being a Dhoni fan, you'll always have issues with Pant getting in.

No, I would have selected Pant in first place around 2 years back atleast. Would have rather thrown tantrums chucking out MSD instead wasting myself on Kumble.

[mani sha]

21 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

no he isnt anyways in odi harly ull get swinging condition 

there are much more bigger problem then only six hitting abilities 

Again ur facts are seriously wrong

 

Lets look at 2016 t20 WC

55* in 37 balls 

82* in 51 balls

89* in 47 balls

 

Here are few more of innings in t20

 

90 in 55 balls 

72 in 44 balls

77 in 58 balls 

59 in 33 balls

50 in 36 balls 

 

seriosuly what are u even talking about , kohli has shown consistency with gr8 s/r 

Surely he is no ABDV, gayle  or yuvraj but those guy werent as consistent as kohli

 

No sehwag underachieved he gave starts and didnt convert them and win u matches ......i can show so many matches where he got fast start and didnt convert due to which team lost 

then he was highly inconsistent most days and was a sitting duck many occasions overseas 

 

U dream a lot n watch less cricket coz most fo ur facts are pretty wrong 

 

Sir the above stats u show are needed to be compared with what opposition did - 

 

kohli at best is a player who can help Pandya and pant go boom boom 

 

 

the games u mention above - what is the strike rate of the opposition players ? 

 

The modern game of t20 is all about strike rates - teams like England and West Indies will win more cod each of their players have high sr 

 

kohli is not a Gayle and that’s what I tell u - we loose finals cause he plays risk averse . If he makes a 15 ball 40 it may end up being a match winning score just like Sehwag used to play - set up innings etc is overrated . Striking it hard upfront is the key to win matches - 10 overs 70 for 1 is better than 45 for 0 . 

[Ankit_sharma03]

11 minutes ago, mani sha said:

Sir the above stats u show are needed to be compared with what opposition did - 

yes please go n check opp n situtaion

these are done against sides like aus, Sa, pak under pressure situtaion

11 minutes ago, mani sha said:

kohli at best is a player who can help Pandya and pant go boom boom 

yes n u need both kind of player

but if needed kohli can bat at s/r around 180 in his style .......

11 minutes ago, mani sha said:

the games u mention above - what is the strike rate of the opposition players ? 

most have less then him 

11 minutes ago, mani sha said:

The modern game of t20 is all about strike rates - teams like England and West Indies will win more cod each of their players have high sr 

so the innings i showed how is those less s/r

11 minutes ago, mani sha said:

kohli is not a Gayle and that’s what I tell u - we loose finals cause he plays risk averse .

Gayle is no kohli hence less consistent n wins less games 

11 minutes ago, mani sha said:

If he makes a 15 ball 40 it may end up being a match winning score just like Sehwag used to play - set up innings etc is overrated . Striking it hard upfront is the key to win matches - 10 overs 70 for 1 is better than 45 for 0 . 

15 in 40 works for t20 but doesnt win u games in ODI 

 

 

This is sehwag 48 in 22 and we lost the game coz he didnt carry n make it big and u can find many ore examples like this 

 

who makes 45-0 all time.....stop exxagerating . Dhawan n rohit, kohli has won India more matches then anyone can imagine

 

[New guy]

On 7/22/2019 at 5:40 PM, Real McCoy said:

You left out the biggest choker in Indian cricket. The one who scores 175 runs but can't get the team to win the game and fall short by 3 runs. The man who batted in ODI cricket at no.4 in England when the ball seams but in flat tracks opens but doesnt take strike first ball because his choking abilities will be for the world to see. He also has the habit of choking on his fingernails. The same guy who batted brilliantly for a centuries but couldn't tolerate back pain for a few more minutes and finish the game in a test match in Chennai (his favorite ground) against his archrivals. He went 4,4,Out. Same guy who scored a century with 77 strike rate when the rest of the team batted over 100 SR in 2012 against a minnow on a flat track. His 100th century is known for his selfishness and most importantly for losing to a minnow side.

I love how this poster repeats pakistani propaganda point every time yet there are Indians who side with this guy

 

This genius thinks openers from any team finish the innings after scoring 100s. Not a single opener finished a single innings in world cup but this genius thinks an opener should be finishing innings 

 

Also this genius thinks an injury to someone is a point to put someone down 

 

 

 

Also this undercover genius praises many of dhonis slow innings but blames sachin for for one inning where he was clearly struggling for timing 

 

I salute you sir, if there was any doubt you had true Pakistani genes, your post has dispelled all that

 

If someone still has not understood how this is a padosi troll and sides with him just because he trolls pro dhoni, I pity their brains