rock777 Posted March 13, 2020 Posted March 13, 2020 3 minutes ago, Manny_Pacquiao said: did hindus and muslims hold equal status under akbar's rule? So you dont know about deen e elahi actually akbar combined priniciples of islam and hinduism to make a new religion and to enforce it he slaughtered many scholars who disagreed to his idea
maniac Posted March 13, 2020 Posted March 13, 2020 (edited) 20 minutes ago, coffee_rules said: I thought he had eternal love for Jodha bai and they both remained virgins to keep their love pure as assutosh saab had told me Edited March 13, 2020 by maniac coffee_rules 1
maniac Posted March 13, 2020 Posted March 13, 2020 8 minutes ago, rock777 said: So you dont know about deen e elahi actually akbar combined priniciples of islam and hinduism to make a new religion and to enforce it he slaughtered many scholars who disagreed to his idea He was a bigot but not as bad as Aurangzeb. That’s basically his benchmark
rock777 Posted March 13, 2020 Posted March 13, 2020 Just now, maniac said: He was a bigot but not as bad as Aurangzeb. That’s basically his benchmark Son but better than modi
coffee_rules Posted March 13, 2020 Posted March 13, 2020 12 minutes ago, rock777 said: So you dont know about deen e elahi actually akbar combined priniciples of islam and hinduism to make a new religion and to enforce it he slaughtered many scholars who disagreed to his idea bewakoof, It was followed by 19 people handpicked by him, it was a delisional cult that was haram as per Sharia. He had called himself the Khalifa, he would have been beheaded in today wahabi following.
Manny_Pacquiao Posted March 13, 2020 Author Posted March 13, 2020 20 minutes ago, rock777 said: So you dont know about deen e elahi actually akbar combined priniciples of islam and hinduism to make a new religion and to enforce it he slaughtered many scholars who disagreed to his idea but you're not answering my question. did hindus and muslims hold equal status under akbar's rule? 29 minutes ago, rock777 said: Son do me a favor please collect data of all kings and then compare it why dont you? you're the one arguing the case for muslim-led secularism. you have to convince us. because hindus think muslims believe they are kufaar.
rock777 Posted March 13, 2020 Posted March 13, 2020 6 minutes ago, coffee_rules said: bewakoof, It was followed by 19 people handpicked by him, it was a delisional cult that was haram as per Sharia. He had called himself the Khalifa, he would have been beheaded in today wahabi following. Son its your ignorance go and re read it or check mujadid alif sani atleast you should confirm before posting
rock777 Posted March 13, 2020 Posted March 13, 2020 Just now, Manny_Pacquiao said: but you're not answering my question. did hindus and muslims hold equal status under akbar's rule? why dont you? you're the one arguing the case for muslim-led secularism. you have to convince us. because hindus think muslims believe they are kufaar. Son whats wrong with kuffar it refers to non muslims and you are not getting my point akbar changed his religion for hindus
maniac Posted March 13, 2020 Posted March 13, 2020 @rock777 you have called me son enough times that I am almost tempted to ask you to buy me the new surface laptop. ab bhaag yahaan se chewtiya saala
Manny_Pacquiao Posted March 13, 2020 Author Posted March 13, 2020 Just now, rock777 said: Son whats wrong with kuffar it refers to non muslims and you are not getting my point akbar changed his religion for hindus but you're still not answering my question: was the average hindu and the average muslim holding equal status under akbar's rule? i wasn't asking anything about akbar himself. even modi calls himself a secular leader...we shouldn't believe politicians.
rock777 Posted March 13, 2020 Posted March 13, 2020 7 minutes ago, Manny_Pacquiao said: but you're still not answering my question: was the average hindu and the average muslim holding equal status under akbar's rule? i wasn't asking anything about akbar himself. even modi calls himself a secular leader...we shouldn't believe politicians. son i have answered it but you will be able to understand it when you will have thorough knowledge of history other wise dont blame me wc2023 1
rock777 Posted March 13, 2020 Posted March 13, 2020 18 minutes ago, maniac said: @rock777 you have called me son enough times that I am almost tempted to ask you to buy me the new surface laptop. ab bhaag yahaan se chewtiya saala son tell me price i will by it for you if icould afford it maniac and Indwin 1 1
Manny_Pacquiao Posted March 13, 2020 Author Posted March 13, 2020 2 minutes ago, rock777 said: son i have answered it but you will be able to understand it when you will have thorough knowledge of history other wise dont blame me you haven't answered me. you avoided the question completely by focusing on akbar....rather than the status of the hindu in relation to the muslim under his rule.
rock777 Posted March 13, 2020 Posted March 13, 2020 4 minutes ago, Manny_Pacquiao said: you haven't answered me. you avoided the question completely by focusing on akbar....rather than the status of the hindu in relation to the muslim under his rule. son i have answered your question but you are in state of denial
coffee_rules Posted March 13, 2020 Posted March 13, 2020 (edited) 31 minutes ago, rock777 said: Son its your ignorance go and re read it or check mujadid alif sani atleast you should confirm before posting bhadwe, don't spout nonsense about what you got from the brainwashing in your madrassa. I have read authentic western sources who have praised Akbar, but still call this Din-i illahi as a confused attempt of a senile. Edited March 13, 2020 by coffee_rules
Manny_Pacquiao Posted March 13, 2020 Author Posted March 13, 2020 3 minutes ago, rock777 said: son i have answered your question but you are in state of denial so hindus were treated as equals to muslims under akbar's rule?
rock777 Posted March 13, 2020 Posted March 13, 2020 2 minutes ago, coffee_rules said: bhadwe, don't spout nonsense about what you got from the brainwashing in your madrassa. I have read authentic western sources who have praised Akbar, but still call this Din-i illahi as a confused attempt of a senile. son thats idiotic from you how could you quote western sources at the time of akbar totally idiotic from an idiot
coffee_rules Posted March 13, 2020 Posted March 13, 2020 2 minutes ago, rock777 said: son thats idiotic from you how could you quote western sources at the time of akbar totally idiotic from an idiot chewtiye, they are unbiased sources, unlike your madrassa material that you are peddling.
Manny_Pacquiao Posted March 13, 2020 Author Posted March 13, 2020 1 minute ago, coffee_rules said: chewtiye, they are unbiased sources, unlike your madrassa material that you are peddling. you seem somewhat knowledgeable on this. what do you think about akbar's rule? did hindus and muslims hold equal status under his reign?
Mariyam Posted March 13, 2020 Posted March 13, 2020 (edited) 13 minutes ago, Manny_Pacquiao said: so hindus were treated as equals to muslims under akbar's rule? Caveat: Not any kind of an expert on history, but of Akbar's Navratans, 4 were Hindus. One was a Hindu who converted to Islam for bettering his career prospects. Was the common Hindu treated as an equal to the common Muslim? I don't know. Probably not. But the Muslims then (and even today) are mainly an urban phenomenon. The bulk of the Hindu population was rural/agrarian. That coupled with religion would be account for the difference in treatment. Also, one should look at Akbar from medieval standards of morality and social norms. He has to be compared to his peers and not to Justin Trudeau and then declared as a liberal/tyrant etc. Edited March 13, 2020 by Mariyam Manny_Pacquiao and Alam_dar 1 1
Recommended Posts