Jump to content

Your favourite innings to watch


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, MechEng said:

You think this was fluke innings along with his Nottiingham 100 in 2002? Sehwag is the last person you expect to get runs against bounce and movement.

why would i think its a fluke??

Posted

Favourite Test Match Innings:

 

Virender Sehwag 309 vs Pak (2004) in Multan

 

Loved the overhyped Pakistani fast bowlers getting destroyed. 

 

It is also the infamous Tendulkar 194* declaration by Dravid, definitely should have allowed him to get 6 more runs.

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Prabhdeep Singh said:

Favourite Test Match Innings:

 

Virender Sehwag 309 vs Pak (2004) in Multan

 

Loved the overhyped Pakistani fast bowlers getting destroyed. 

 

It is also the infamous Tendulkar 194* declaration by Dravid, definitely should have allowed him to get 6 more runs.

 

 

It was not their best attack by any means, Akhtar looked bored, Shabbir Ahmed and Umar Gul were good bowlers but not great.

Posted
On 4/3/2020 at 5:09 PM, Ankit_sharma03 said:

why would i think its a fluke??

Ah no, wanted to know if you thought it was fluke or not. I believe those knocks in SA and England were flukes because Sehwag never gets to the pitch of the ball.

Posted
On 4/3/2020 at 9:41 AM, maniac said:

 

probably the 3rd greatest knock in an Ind-Pak Wc encounter after Sachin 2003 and Jadeja 96 however in terms of sheer bullying and dominance no.1 

 

Sachin was destructive against a quality bowling 

 

However Rohit's knock was sheer bullying like how that kid bullied those elementary kids scoring 1000 in an innings. How the hell did he miss yet another easy 200 :wall: 

Bullying bole toh everything pales in comparison to that tennis shot for six off Kulasekara in that once in a lifetime 264.

Posted
1 minute ago, MechEng said:

Ah no, wanted to know if you thought it was fluke or not. I believe those knocks in SA and England were flukes because Sehwag never gets to the pitch of the ball.

Fluke is a misused word. Anything that comes from the middle of the bat cant n shudnt be called fluke. If he gets runs by edges well call it fluke . Also if it happens again n again definately not a fluke. 

He never gets to the pitch of the ball ...doesnt matter ....what matters is he knew how to make runs by his way.

Posted
16 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

Fluke is a misused word. Anything that comes from the middle of the bat cant n shudnt be called fluke. If he gets runs by edges well call it fluke . Also if it happens again n again definately not a fluke. 

He never gets to the pitch of the ball ...doesnt matter ....what matters is he knew how to make runs by his way.

True in a way, Graeme Pollock had no footwork, yet he is highly respected even among cricket purists.

Posted
4 hours ago, FischerTal said:

Damien Martyn.....

 

This is like a diversity training program for a racist like me who thinks goras cannot play wristy shots.

Posted
16 hours ago, Stan AF said:

 

 

This is the reason why I am not a big fan of speed guns. Akhtar and Sami getting phainty with 90 mph bowling.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...