Jump to content

All Rounders Do Not Exist Part - II


Khota

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, maniac said:


if  my eye sight is ok the scoreline reads 4-2 which means the ball is doing a lot of things, you couldn’t find a better example?

 

If u read the discussion he thinks that him being in semi wud have made the diff , it was moving like this in semi infact more. This wasnt that much , if u look closely it didnt do that much just straightened a bat but he had a habbit pushing his bat to forward 

Also kohli was a soft dismissal before this

Actually i had few more but BCCI videos are god knows where and Aus cricket videos cant be embedded , even zimbabwe tour where 120k bowler were squaring him up 

Link to comment
38 minutes ago, maniac said:


if  my eye sight is ok the scoreline reads 4-2 which means the ball is doing a lot of things, you couldn’t find a better example?

 

He will dig up crap to prove his point and that is the reason I never take him seriously. He provides entertainment alright.

 

I got into arguement with him abou Dhawan scoring more runs than his favorite but he decided to take runs off for miscues. He is special.

 

 

Link to comment
7 hours ago, Khota said:

 

He will dig up crap to prove his point and that is the reason I never take him seriously. He provides entertainment alright.

 

I got into arguement with him abou Dhawan scoring more runs than his favorite but he decided to take runs off for miscues. He is special.

 

 

I agree. He will support his players like pant and saini wants them to be to given 100 matches to prove but as per him mayank is wasting chances after 5 odis. 

 Biased poster 

Edited by Bhoot
Link to comment
1 hour ago, Bhoot said:

I agree. He will support his players like oant and saini wants them to be to given 100 matches to prove but as oer him mayank is wasting chances after 5 odis. 

 Biased poster 

Make it 1000 matches for some and after 5 matches get rid of Mayank. 

There is nothing Mayank has done that says he should be kicked out.

Link to comment
India batting averages
Player Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s
HH Pandya 3* 3 1 210 92* 105.00 183 114.75 0 2 0 15 6
V Kohli 3* 3 0 173 89 57.66 186 93.01 0 2 0 14 3
RA Jadeja 3* 3 1 115 66* 57.50 98 117.34 0 1 0 6 6
S Dhawan 3* 3 0 120 74 40.00 136 88.23 0 1 0 17 0
Shubman Gill 1* 1 0 33 33 33.00 39 84.61 0 0 0 3 1
KL Rahul 3* 3 0 93 76 31.00 92 101.08 0 1 0 5 5
MA Agarwal 2 2 0 50 28 25.00 44 113.63 0 0 0 6 1
SS Iyer 3* 3 0 59 38 19.66 59 100.00 0 0 0 7 0
Mohammed Shami 2 2 0 14 13 7.00 14 100.00 0 0 0 1 1
JJ Bumrah 3* 2 1 0 0* 0.00 5 0.00 0 0 1 0 0
NA Saini 2 2 2 39 29* - 45 86.66 0 0 0 2

 

 

 

 

@Khota- who has most runs for india in this series ?

Link to comment
4 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:
India batting averages
Player Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s
HH Pandya 3* 3 1 210 92* 105.00 183 114.75 0 2 0 15 6
V Kohli 3* 3 0 173 89 57.66 186 93.01 0 2 0 14 3
RA Jadeja 3* 3 1 115 66* 57.50 98 117.34 0 1 0 6 6
S Dhawan 3* 3 0 120 74 40.00 136 88.23 0 1 0 17 0
Shubman Gill 1* 1 0 33 33 33.00 39 84.61 0 0 0 3 1
KL Rahul 3* 3 0 93 76 31.00 92 101.08 0 1 0 5 5
MA Agarwal 2 2 0 50 28 25.00 44 113.63 0 0 0 6 1
SS Iyer 3* 3 0 59 38 19.66 59 100.00 0 0 0 7 0
Mohammed Shami 2 2 0 14 13 7.00 14 100.00 0 0 0 1 1
JJ Bumrah 3* 2 1 0 0* 0.00 5 0.00 0 0 1 0 0
NA Saini 2 2 2 39 29* - 45 86.66 0 0 0 2

 

 

 

 

@Khota- who has most runs for india in this series ?

It was not a bowler.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Khota said:

Fact: He did not bowl. Are you disputing that???

Do u want him to not recover and get injured like bhuvi? Didnt he bowl in last game ...if he feels his back is still not 100 % why shud u he bowl ?

Do u understand whats a back surgery?

Do u despute that he has been the best indian batsman of the series ?

Do u wanna say the humble pies u tastes recently werent tasty ?

 

Link to comment
8 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

Do u want him to not recover and get injured like bhuvi? Didnt he bowl in last game ...if he feels his back is still not 100 % why shud u he bowl ?

Do u understand whats a back surgery?

Do u despute that he has been the best indian batsman of the series ?

Do u wanna say the humble pies u tastes recently werent tasty ?

 

All this proves that I have right all along.

 

Human body cannot do two things.

Link to comment
13 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

 

by ur injury logic bhuvi constant break down and rohit reoccuring hamstring proves body cant do one thing also 

That is my point. It is so difficult to remain injury free doing one task how can you remain injury free doing two. Pandya injury is related to bowling and there is no other reason. Trying to do too much.

Link to comment
12 minutes ago, Khota said:

That is my point. It is so difficult to remain injury free doing one task how can you remain injury free doing two. Pandya injury is related to bowling and there is no other reason. Trying to do too much.

 

like how flintoff, kalllis, cairns, kapil, botham, hadlee, razzaq, stokes managed their career

u cant avoid injury , its a part of game......ur telling as if all rounder havent had careers in cricket . 

 

1st ur top was they dont exist then ppl showed u names - u resorted to anamoly and shifted ur goal post to pandya perfomance and that he performed its his fitnes, dont work he ll come back n bowl as well his career isnt over yet.

Decide karlena kehna kya hai, kyunki injury to sabko hi hoti hai 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...