Jump to content

What's the point of squad selection when they dont select the playing XI from the selected squad?


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Right & you know the opposition don't you, besides the pitches? He doesn't even have 10 wickets against those 4 nations combined in the last 6 years in India :hmpf:

 

It's like people quoting Voges' test avg & forgetting he was 2.5x Bradman against one single opponent i.e. WI :cantstop:

Edited by R!TTER
Posted (edited)

Last 6 years is not really relevant for Ishant as he has become a high quality bowler from 2018 only.

 

He has reversed the ball both ways today at good enough pace and bowled in good areas. Has kept up the pressure from his end.

 

I would have liked Siraj to play too ( to encourage him after his five-for )  ... but from a team point of view, choosing Ishant is not a downgrade. Shami and Umesh are obviously much better in Asia but they are injured.

Edited by express bowling
Posted (edited)

It is relevant because he's never had the pace nor skills to be great in India, also did you forget the conditions away from home? You're making it sound as if he's the second coming of McGrath & Garner rolled into one? I have no idea why some of you are making it as if he's had this exceptional second coming & no one else has these numbers?

 

View overall figures [change view]
Opposition team Australia or England or India or New Zealand or South Africa 
On continent Africa or Europe or Oceania 
Start of match date greater than or equal to 1 Jan 2018 
Qualifications wickets taken greater than or equal to 40 
Ordered by bowling average (ascending)
Page 1 of 1 Showing 1 - 11 of 11       Return to query menu
Cleared query menu
Overall figures
Player Span Mat Inns Overs Mdns Runs Wkts BBI BBM Ave Econ SR 5 10  
PJ Cummins (AUS) 2018-2021 21 41 817.0 209 2195 106 6/27 9/99 20.70 2.68 46.2 3 0  
JM Anderson (ENG) 2018-2020 11 19 370.4 116 871 42 5/20 9/43 20.73 2.34 52.9 2 0  
TG Southee (NZ) 2018-2020 8 15 334.5 73 969 45 6/62 9/110 21.53 2.89 44.6 3 0  
I Sharma (INDIA) 2018-2020 11 21 346.2 75 925 42 5/51 6/97 22.02 2.67 49.4 2 0  
K Rabada (SA) 2018-2020 10 19 352.0 77 1152 52 6/54 11/150 22.15 3.27 40.6 2 1  
JJ Bumrah (INDIA) 2018-2021 15 30 582.0 136 1586 66 6/33 9/86 24.03 2.72 52.9 3 0  
JR Hazlewood (AUS) 2018-2021 18 34 659.4 184 1736 66 5/8 9/115 26.30 2.63 59.9 3 0  

 

 

The numbers are a result of the type of pitches he's played on, it's really as simple as that.

Edited by R!TTER
Posted

Basic Knowledge Session for zero iq cricket fans :

1.Right Arm Off Spinners turn the ball into RHB. 

2.Chinaman turns the ball into RHB. 

3.SLAO turns the ball away from RHB. 

4. Ishant Sharma has Atg stats in the last few years not only away from home but in India too. 

5. The left arm around angle gives the bowler a chance to beat batsman both on the inside and outside. 

 

 

Posted
15 minutes ago, Adamant said:

Basic Knowledge Session for zero iq cricket fans :

1.Right Arm Off Spinners turn the ball into RHB. 

2.Chinaman turns the ball into RHB. 

3.SLAO turns the ball away from RHB. 

4. Ishant Sharma has Atg stats in the last few years not only away from home but in India too. 

5. The left arm around angle gives the bowler a chance to beat batsman both on the inside and outside. 

 

 

What's your point? We all know this.

Posted (edited)

Reply to the thread title...

 

Sundar wasn't in the Aussie series squad. He was back up. Still played and helped win us a historic series.. 

 

Get out of traditional thinking. It's all about horses for courses. If you have someone suitable available for the conditions, you pick him no matter what. 

 

 

You don't just put blanket restrictions saying so n so can't be picked coz he wasn't in original squad. 

Edited by OpeningBatsman
Posted
26 minutes ago, OpeningBatsman said:

Reply to the thread title...

 

Sundar wasn't in the Aussie series squad. He was back up. Still played and helped win us a historic series.. 

 

Get out of traditional thinking. It's all about horses for courses. If you have someone suitable available for the conditions, you pick him no matter what. 

 

 

You don't just put blanket restrictions saying so n so can't be picked coz he wasn't in original squad. 

 

Sundar's selection in Gabba was more of necessity with so many injuries. 

 

But in this case, I had a problem with Nadeem coming in but considering Axar is injured, it makes sense as he has been added to the squad. 

 

Otherwise whats the point of selection committee? Just get rid of that as well.

Posted
OK, Axar is injured so Nadeep comes to the squad. Yet, Sundar is playing ahead of kuldeep dont make sense. Kuldeep can also chip in with the bat if required. Very defensive team selection.
If we listened to u in final test in Aus we would have played Kuldip and lost

Sent from my CPH1819 using Tapatalk

Posted
49 minutes ago, anish2tweet said:

If we listened to u in final test in Aus we would have played Kuldip and lost

Sent from my CPH1819 using Tapatalk
 

Yeah & if we listened to Kohli we'd have lost the series 4-nil  :whack2:

Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, urbestfriend said:

OK, Axar is injured so Nadeep comes to the squad. Yet, Sundar is playing ahead of kuldeep dont make sense. Kuldeep can also chip in with the bat if required. Very defensive team selection.

What doesn't make sense is stupid threads like this. 

Kuldeep bowling has tapered of completely in last 2 years. Even kkr are looking to rid of him. He would have done zilch on this wicket and then we would have threads like.. Nadeem was dealt badly after playing 1 test and taking 4 wickets.. 

 

Yes players not in the Xi always appear better. 

Edited by Bhoot
Posted
2 minutes ago, Bhoot said:

What doesn't make sense is stupid threads like this. 

Kuldeep bowling has tapered of completely in last 2 years. Even kkr are looking to rid of him. He would have done zilch on this wicket and then we would have threads like.. Nadeem was dealt badly after playing 1 test and taking 4 wickets.. 

 

Yes players not in the Xi always appear better. 

Dude, I commented this before the start of the match. 

 

If kuldeep is not good enough, why is he in the team? Just to supply drinks? Give his position to someone else. 

 

This guy has played a test match 2 years before, and he is with the team. Apparently he is not good enough for abroad, not good enough for home, not good enough because team needs batting depth..

 

What kind of confidence you're giving to him. 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, urbestfriend said:

Dude, I commented this before the start of the match. 

 

If kuldeep is not good enough, why is he in the team? Just to supply drinks? Give his position to someone else. 

 

This guy has played a test match 2 years before, and he is with the team. Apparently he is not good enough for abroad, not good enough for home, not good enough because team needs batting depth..

 

What kind of confidence you're giving to him. 

 

Exactly what I meant.... 2 years before... He has tapered off.. Him being in the team is necassry due to corona and a big squad is needed. Not every one gets to play all the time... 

 

What matches would he have played abroad? You can't drop ashwin n jadeja... N when jaddu got injured n sundar was picked everyone whined there too... Only to get their mouth shut when sundar effectively won us the match... Not everything is black and blue.. Dude... 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Bhoot said:

Exactly what I meant.... 2 years before... He has tapered off.. Him being in the team is necassry due to corona and a big squad is needed. Not every one gets to play all the time... 

 

What matches would he have played abroad? You can't drop ashwin n jadeja... N when jaddu got injured n sundar was picked everyone whined there too... Only to get their mouth shut when sundar effectively won us the match... Not everything is black and blue.. Dude... 

Sure, he is not good enough to play abroad, is he not good enough to play at home? 

Now we assess his form based on IPL tamasha? 

What form Umesh yadav and Siraj was in IPL? 

Unless u give him a chance, how do you know what form is he in?

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, urbestfriend said:

Sure, he is not good enough to play abroad, is he not good enough to play at home? 

Now we assess his form based on IPL tamasha? 

What form Umesh yadav and Siraj was in IPL? 

Unless u give him a chance, how do you know what form is he in?

No I'm not judging based on ipl. I'm just sharing he has lost his zip off the wicket. This pitch would have fi nished his career. He will get his chances in this series im sure.

Hope you  remember saini the next best thing after sliced bread. Similar threads of him being ignored and we all saw what happened. 

Edited by Bhoot
Posted
9 minutes ago, Bhoot said:

No I'm not judging based on ipl. I'm just sharing he has lost his zip off the wicket. This pitch would have finished his career. He will get his chances in this series im sure. 

He might get a chance but see what kind of pressure he'll be in and what confidence you're giving to the youngster if he is not starting in the first test and rahul chahar is already drafted into the team. Ravi shashtri was saying he was our no 1 spinner and one bad IPL seson , he just goes down the pecking order.

Posted
16 hours ago, urbestfriend said:

Dude, I commented this before the start of the match. 

 

If kuldeep is not good enough, why is he in the team? Just to supply drinks? Give his position to someone else. 

 

This guy has played a test match 2 years before, and he is with the team. Apparently he is not good enough for abroad, not good enough for home, not good enough because team needs batting depth..

 

What kind of confidence you're giving to him. 

 

This is the point everyone seems to be missing. This horses for courses was missing when squad was selected and this i have a dream .. kind of captaincy is why Kohli hasnt been successful.  

Posted

Kohli sometimes selects XI more on intuition than on merit.

A bit like fantasy XI selections.

Playing Shahbaz is just based on an assumption that he will be more handy against righties than Kuldeep.

I personally find this thinking flawed while it may be reasonable for some. 

It should be "just play your best available players if there is nothing to choose between the two apply intuition".

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...