Jump to content

Who is the best No.3 in the world. (SENA)


Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Lord said:

Why are Kane/Labu not there at all in away list?

 

Originally i used SENA filter. Forgot to remove it. here is the updated away record in the last 5 years.  Williamson averages 34 . 8 points less than Pujara. Labu hardly batted outside. I  won't say Smith is the best no.3 as he is not a no.3. Only in certain scenarios he bats there.

 

 

umCodzH.png

Link to comment
6 minutes ago, R!TTER said:

They also feasted on dross pitches, no DRS & umps generally not giving anything out unless it was hitting the middle of middle  :cantstop:

Kane is a technically solid player with odd issue with his attempt to run down to third man. Pujara is never going to reach the level of Dravid.  Marnus vs Ponting. No contest. Kallis was a rock solid batsman against any type of bowling.

Link to comment
3 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

Kane is a technically solid player with odd issue with his attempt to run down to third man. Pujara is never going to reach the level of Dravid.  Marnus vs Ponting. No contest. Kallis was a rock solid batsman against any type of bowling.

Pujarâ better than dravud vs pace and bounce.

Link to comment
3 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

Kane is a technically solid player with odd issue with his attempt to run down to third man. Pujara is never going to reach the level of Dravid.  Marnus vs Ponting. No contest. Kallis was a rock solid batsman against any type of bowling.

All those batsmen from ancient era would struggle vs modern bowling greats. 

 

Bowling is much superior now. 

Link to comment
7 minutes ago, Jay said:

Because he matured and hit his prime now??

 

He also plays with an ATg bowling attack now. 

 

That makes SMith superior to Tendulkar,  Lara.  It is something to do with woeful technique of modern day batsmen with the exception of a few. Back in the day India would have never lost a Test due to a bowler like Moeen Ali.

Link to comment
17 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

That makes SMith superior to Tendulkar,  Lara.  It is something to do with woeful technique of modern day batsmen with the exception of a few. Back in the day India would have never lost a Test due to a bowler like Moeen Ali.

India drew many tests in those times. 

 

Draw vs suffers twice. 

Draw vs pakistan iirc

Lost to England rofl

 

India have the best record at home under kohli. 

Link to comment
23 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

That makes SMith superior to Tendulkar,  Lara.  It is something to do with woeful technique of modern day batsmen with the exception of a few. Back in the day India would have never lost a Test due to a bowler like Moeen Ali.

Smith is superior to all of them btw. 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...