Jump to content

Rishabh Pant or Mohammed Rizwan - who is better batsman?


Better batsman   

29 members have voted

  1. 1. Who is better batsman?



Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Baji-Rao said:


LMAOO. Dude Rizwan has a SENA average of 50. Destroyed nz, eng and sa in tests and they were all A teams ffs. Australia he did okay too with two 90s iirc

Pant could wish for such an average in SENA conditions. but will now look for home conditions to bump his stats up unfortunately

 

BS

 

how many tons does he have in SENA?

Link to comment

Hahahha Rozwan is a decent talent. In next 2-3 years Pant's gonna be the best in the world..Aus and Eng commentators cant stop talking about him. Teams are scared of him cos they know he's a match winner. He is in the same mould as Gilchrist. Rizwan at best is a Moin khan or like some one said Watling 

Link to comment
15 minutes ago, Baji-Rao said:

And until Pant doesn't show his brilliance no point of debating who is better rn with the bat since Rizwan is in immaculate form, while Pant still needs to make numbers

Which era or century are you in.. brillaince with bat and Pant.. are you in medieval age.. what did he do in Australia twice ( 2018 and 2020) in england ( oval century in his second test).?? I mean is this post for real?? Of all hoohahs pakistan hasnt even won a test in sena for 6 yrs for god sake

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, Baji-Rao said:


Thats not how you do SENA stats,

Thats SENA as opposition. Put SENA as conditions (venues) then you'll realise the difference

 

Rizwan's is correct

 

Here's Pant (filter got removed)

 

https://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/player/931581.html?class=1;filter=advanced;home_or_away=2;opposition=1;opposition=2;opposition=5;orderby=default;template=results;type=batting

 

Still same

Edited by Lord
Link to comment

Lol wtf Pant isn’t even that far behind compared to Rizwan in terms of keeping. Pant has better dismissal/innings ratio than Rizwan in tests (about 4 per match compared to Rizwans 2) and lags behind Rizwan in LOIs, however I’m pretty sure Pant wasn’t keeping in some LOIs because Dhoni was the keeper

Edited by QuarantineTormentino
Link to comment
6 minutes ago, Baji-Rao said:


thats teamwork, this is a Rizwan vs Pant thread sir, or have you humiliated yourself to resorting to team performances after seeing Rizwan's individual superior stats?

 

You have dementia or amnesia or illiterate

 

who has better stats and numbers :

 

 

RIZWAN

 

15 Tests

820 Runs

43.1 average

Age 29

centuries 1.

SR 56

 

 

Pant

 

21 Tests

1403 runs

43.8 average

Age 23

centuries 3.  

SR 69

 


 

Link to comment
2 minutes ago, Baji-Rao said:


Oh right just rechecked. LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Pant
 average in NZ is 15 and 25 in England LOLLLLL
62 in Australia is the reason he's even got a good 40 SENA average.


Rizwan average 45 in Australia, 41 in England and 43 in New Zealand to make a higher 43 SENA average.

LOLLLLLL thanks for the stats man

Yeah both avgs 43 but stats mean nothing if u cant win matches for your team. Rizwan is a good player but not a match winner, opposition won't waste time on him. Pant is an impact player, on only 2-3 yrs in Int cricket he has shown that. 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...