Jump to content

India tour of Eng - Tour Match, Chester-le-Street (3 day match)


Recommended Posts

Posted
10 minutes ago, The Realist said:

98/2 Both openers out

 

Pujara failed again as only made 38

This inning of 38 would ensure that he stays in the team for the entire series.   

Posted
6 minutes ago, Austin 3:!6 said:

So looks like Pujara is not a sure starter now

 

he might open.Don't think extra 9 runs will help Mayank

 

More importantly it will be open up a spot for Rahul

Posted
Just now, Cricspin said:

Vihari does not bring any value over Jadeja. He won't play.

 

We don't have too many spots for bats. KL Rahul will get first consideration 

 

KL I think has secured his spot at 5.

 

Vihari and Jadeja fight for no. 7

Posted

Ashwin has made his case so strongl that it would be criminal to drop him even on a seamer freindly surface, and Jadeja's batting in this match can't be ignored. Only if Shardul scored 50+ we could have seen him in the first test. 

Posted
1 minute ago, CodeOfWisden said:

Jadeja's batting has really improved and we can't really drop Ashwin, but then we can't go with just 3 pacers too, too much confusion. :facepalm:

We can't really have a balanced lineup until our bowlers learn how to hold a bat. 

 

or if our batsmen can bowl,specially seam up

 

Amazing how our bowlers are castigated regularly for not able to bat,but not batsmen for not able to bowl even decent part time

Posted

Really hoping they don't play Pujara..  However him opening won't be too bad as he won't have to face spin.  He can neither rotate nor hit out against spin. 

Rahul in middle order will give me some hope. 

 

Posted
3 hours ago, LordPrabhzy said:

Kolhi, Rahane, Shami, Ishant and Ashwin not playing the only practice match before the test series.. ( Ashwin I can forgive, he played a game for Surrey and did well).. what is the excuse for the rest of the seniors...? Cant imagine any other country's senior players doing this on an important tour

I think kohli and rahane are not fully fit.

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Lord said:

 

or if our batsmen can bowl,specially seam up

 

Amazing how our bowlers are castigated regularly for not able to bat,but not batsmen for not able to bowl even decent part time

Bro I don't think even any other team has a batsman who regularly bowls an take wickets, it's much easier for a bowler to learn to score a few runs in test cricket than for a batsman to bowl seam. 

Our tailenders are just pathetic, no batsman in nz, aus, Sa, pak, eng (who isn't an allrounder) bowls pace. 

In limited overs I totally agree with you, we need our batsman to bowl some overs but in test cricket we shouldn't expect the same, it won't help the team. 

Edited by CodeOfWisden
Posted
4 minutes ago, CodeOfWisden said:

Siraj and Shami are certainties, Bumrah, Ishant and Umesh(after his 3fer) are in the competition for 3rd pacer's spot. 

 

I would prefer Bumrah. 

 

Siraj is not a certainty at all.

Posted
1 minute ago, CodeOfWisden said:

Bro I don't think even any other team has a batsman who regularly bowls an take wickets, it's much easier for a bowler to learn to score a few runs in test cricket than for a batsman to bowl seam. 

Our tailenders are just pathetic, no batsman in nz, aus, Sa, pak, eng (who isn't an allrounder) bowls pace. 

 

Eng have Root who can bowl spin.SA have Elgar.Labushagne and Travis Head can bowl too.None of them are AR.

 

For SENA teams, a part timer spinner is more useful than a seamer

 

Similarly we just need one Ganguly type seamer.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...