What would be your preferred no.7 among

[Chakdephatte]

11 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

• Shardul is a better hitter then Chahar 
• shardul offers middle phase bowling, chahar PP for which bhuvi-bumrah-hardik are already in XI
• Shardul can bowl in PP 
• As i told u before Shardul is good on longer grounds and spungy pitches like MCG
• Shardul also kind off is a character who kind of changes the game

Basically shardul i never wanted to ignore in Australia , India hota to sawaal hi nhin uska . 

As a bowler yes he is a compromise as compare to Arshdeep, Chahar but so is jadeja/Axar...............which is why i still consider him 

 

Economy close to 9. Other analysis is worthless in such cases.

 

I would play Ash at 7 if he solves the left-handers problem. Give up on batting front.

Edited August 7, 2022 by Chakdephatte

[straighttalk]

1 hour ago, Lord said:

For Aus, Ideally we dont need a spin AR at all. I'd have punted on Deepak at 7. But for that our top 6 need to be very good.

 

As things stand, we gonna have Kohli and Pant in top 6. And with our aggressive approach, we do need a better bat imo.

I dnt think Pant has a space in the team if KLR is fit. If you see Rohit kohli pandya sky dk Jadeja is fixed. Leaving one spot for KLR pant hooda Iyer Samson to  fill in

[Lord]

1 minute ago, straighttalk said:

I dnt think Pant has a space in the team if KLR is fit. If you see Rohit kohli pandya sky dk Jadeja is fixed. Leaving one spot for KLR pant hooda Iyer Samson to  fill in

 

Will be between Pant and DK and I'll be surprised if they leave out Pant

[Majestic]

Ultimately Jadeja will get a go because Axar will have issues with his bowling. Hooda's batting will not be good enough to give him a place as specialist bat and Jadeja's stats as batsman in last two years has been pretty good. Also, the fielding aspect too.

 

 

[Majestic]

DK in T20Is after IPL 2022:-

 

Matches 14, AVG 22, S/R 133

 

Not that good tbh. Expected better average by being not out which isn't the case.

[Ankit_sharma03]

9 hours ago, Chakdephatte said:

 

Economy close to 9. Other analysis is worthless in such cases.

 

I would play Ash at 7 if he solves the left-handers problem. Give up on batting front.

 

im not saying he is a good bowler, im saying he is decent bowler + value added player in right condition

that eco is a combination of all condition but Wc is just one tournament in one condition 

 

 

See the diff , longer ground , two pace or spungy wkt or extra pace n bounce ..................number changes 

 

 

 

[Ankit_sharma03]

9 hours ago, Lord said:

 

Will be between Pant and DK and I'll be surprised if they leave out Pant

in XI pant is a lock, he is the only leftie..............i dnt get it how ppl think we ll go without even one leftie

Axar/jaddu to mat hi bolna 

[Ankit_sharma03]

 

 

[Chakdephatte]

Axar turning the game in India's favour. While the batting depth we get with playing two all-rounders is useful for 5-6 balls. 

[Lord]

1 hour ago, Chakdephatte said:

Axar turning the game in India's favour. While the batting depth we get with playing two all-rounders is useful for 5-6 balls. 

yes it has helped top order bat more fearlessly

[Chakdephatte]

On 6/28/2024 at 1:46 AM, Lord said:

yes it has helped top order bat more fearlessly

What I was saying is actually the opposite of it. Number 6 does not face enough balls in T20s and below 6, they get to bat in rare cases only. Hence, it does not make a big difference. On flatter pitches, the effect of depth is hardly felt, in New York though, it was necessary. 

[Lord]

4 minutes ago, Chakdephatte said:

What I was saying is actually the opposite of it. Number 6 does not face enough balls in T20s and below 6, they get to bat in rare cases only. Hence, it does not make a big difference. On flatter pitches, the effect of depth is hardly felt, in New York though, it was necessary. 

 

It does help mentally though. Early wickets can always fall when you are attacking so its nice to have some depth. Otherwise you have to play cautious even in T20

[Nikhil_cric]

Batting depth is the single most crucial component of any white ball side. 

[singhvivek141]

5 hours ago, Chakdephatte said:

What I was saying is actually the opposite of it. Number 6 does not face enough balls in T20s and below 6, they get to bat in rare cases only. Hence, it does not make a big difference. On flatter pitches, the effect of depth is hardly felt, in New York though, it was necessary. 

The batting depth is an insurance, it may not be needed always but when in need, the absence is most felt.

[Chakdephatte]

8 hours ago, Lord said:

It does help mentally though. Early wickets can always fall when you are attacking so its nice to have some depth. Otherwise you have to play cautious even in T20

 

Ideally, professional teams must have a lot of analytics and conditioning coaches. As a result players should be able to make informed choices based on logic and data and not purely on gut. 

 

My theory is that once they come to ground, their instincts kick in. See Kohli this match, he was trying to be attacking whole tournament, but what happened today. Batting depth is same. 

 

8 hours ago, Nikhil_cric said:

Batting depth is the single most crucial component of any white ball side. 

No. My above post is enough. 

 

Anyway, India played better in world cup when Hardik Pandya was injured and we went with specialist players. Shami alone covered up for the lack of depth. 

 

3 hours ago, singhvivek141 said:

The batting depth is an insurance, it may not be needed always but when in need, the absence is most felt.

That's perfect. 

[Lord]

4 minutes ago, Chakdephatte said:

 

Ideally, professional teams must have a lot of analytics and conditioning coaches. As a result players should be able to make informed choices based on logic and data and not purely on gut. 

 

My theory is that once they come to ground, their instincts kick in. See Kohli this match, he was trying to be attacking whole tournament, but what happened today. Batting depth is same. 

 

Early wickets. Usually he's first to get out. Still a poor knock

[Nikhil_cric]

Dube 175 strike rate. Kohli 104.  Kohli fans conspicuous by their absence 

[Chakdephatte]

34 minutes ago, Lord said:

 

Early wickets. Usually he's first to get out. Still a poor knock

I don't know how you missed the point. Thing is that having 8 batsmen didn't make him play fast. 

[Lord]

Just now, Chakdephatte said:

I don't know how you missed the point. Thing is that having 8 batsmen didn't make him play fast. 

 

yes it was a poor knock. Some consolidation was needed but after 10 overs he should've attacked.