Jump to content

Lower order boundary hitting consistency among Indian batsmen in T20


Recommended Posts

Posted

Against 9 regular sides (incl BD/Afghanistan)

Batting position 6 to 11. These are regulars. Raina has batted at various spots. So left him out.

 

BOUNDARY PER BALL

 

  1. V Iyer 67 balls 12 fours 5 sixes Boundary every  3.94 balls
  2. Y Pathan 107 balls 8 fours 12 sixes Boundary every 5.35 balls
  3. Axar 71 balls 9 fours 3 sixes Boundary 5.91 balls
  4. Krunal  95 balls  8 fours 6 sixes Boundary every 6.78 balls
  5. DK     306 balls 26 fours 17 sixes  Bounary every 7.11 balls
  6. Dhoni  594 balls 54 fours 23 sixes  Boundary every 7.7 balls
  7. Irfan 106 balls 6 fours 6 sixes Boundary every 8.83 balls
  8. Jadeja  281 balls  24 fours 9 sixes Boundary every  8.51 balls
  9. Pandya  232 balls 13 fours 12 sixes Boundary every 9.28 balls


SIX PER BALL

 

1. Yusuf pathan 8.91
2. V Iyer 13.4
3. Krunal 15.8
4. Irfan 17.66
5. DK 18
6. Pandya 19.33
7. Axar 23.66
8. Dhoni 25.82
9. Jadeja 31.22

 

 

 

 

Posted
34 minutes ago, tweaker said:

Why V Iyer was  not considered even for Ireland and Zimbabwe series.

A left handed batsman ,who can bat at any position, can bowl some overs in the middle.

 

He had a poor IPL season and no place was left for him.

Posted
10 hours ago, tweaker said:

Why V Iyer was  not considered even for Ireland and Zimbabwe series.

A left handed batsman ,who can bat at any position, can bowl some overs in the middle.

 

when ur on thin edge u cant afford many failures. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

when ur on thin edge u cant afford many failures. 

 

More to do with Pandya's return as he was used as a filler. But i would back him over Shreyas Iyer in T20 format atleast.

Posted
10 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

More to do with Pandya's return as he was used as a filler. But i would back him over Shreyas Iyer in T20 format atleast.

yes that was always going to happen but its just not that ,

  • its clear that they dont trust his bowling
  • In a squad u can only fill limited number of all rounder so even as a backup all rounder he is competing with Axar, sundar and all these guys. Not role but one slot in 15-16 squad 

 

Shreyas has TM faith , Venky clearly didnt earn it. A player who ll earn TM trust will always be backed more and if they are not backing his batting also means they dont even trust that much 

Posted
9 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

yes that was always going to happen but its just not that ,

  • its clear that they dont trust his bowling
  • In a squad u can only fill limited number of all rounder so even as a backup all rounder he is competing with Axar, sundar and all these guys. Not role but one slot in 15-16 squad 

 

Shreyas has TM faith , Venky clearly didnt earn it. A player who ll earn TM trust will always be backed more and if they are not backing his batting also means they dont even trust that much 

also his runs just came against WI, that attack is worth not taking that srsly ..........rather draw conclusion on IPL which test u more then WI team and in IPL his s.r is 120............even in good season it was 128

Against NZ- 128 

Against SL- 125

 

at times data needs to digged a lil deeper 

 

Rather Axar hitting in recent WI series more seriously.............coz those are not easy wkts for batsman coming in late as by the time pitches get slow and timing gets harder  

Posted
1 hour ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

also his runs just came against WI, that attack is worth not taking that srsly ..........rather draw conclusion on IPL which test u more then WI team and in IPL his s.r is 120............even in good season it was 128

Against NZ- 128 

Against SL- 125

 

at times data needs to digged a lil deeper 

 

Rather Axar hitting in recent WI series more seriously.............coz those are not easy wkts for batsman coming in late as by the time pitches get slow and timing gets harder  

 

In IPL you can do a lot of trundler bashing as well. I think promoting him to open again kinda messed up his flow. He was batting in the middle for India. was batting in the middle in Vijay Hazare Trophy.  If we strictly take IPL seriously lot of these guys won't be playing. 

Posted
9 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

In IPL you can do a lot of trundler bashing as well.

 

then how come his s.r is 120 in IPL and even his best IPL was 128 s/r 

Also just becoz some bowls at lower speed doesnt mean they can be smashed. Umran, kuldeep, saini all have been smashed in IPL 

 

Poor Line n length gets smashed not extra or less pace. WI generally struggle with that which his one sample of WI series shudnt be taken this srsly 

 

9 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

I think promoting him to open again kinda messed up his flow. He was batting in the middle for India. was batting in the middle in Vijay Hazare Trophy.  If we strictly take IPL seriously lot of these guys won't be playing. 

it didnt mess his flow , its 2nd season teams come up with plans .  His best came at open and its the best position to bat so that shudnt be an excuse . 

Ur forgetting even in his best season his s/r was 128

Posted
10 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

If we strictly take IPL seriously lot of these guys won't be playing. 

its not sticking to IPL its about choosing the data that gives better picture. 

IPL is more challenging then this WI side . 

Posted
1 hour ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

 

then how come his s.r is 120 in IPL and even his best IPL was 128 s/r 

Also just becoz some bowls at lower speed doesnt mean they can be smashed. Umran, kuldeep, saini all have been smashed in IPL 

 

Poor Line n length gets smashed not extra or less pace. WI generally struggle with that which his one sample of WI series shudnt be taken this srsly 

 

it didnt mess his flow , its 2nd season teams come up with plans .  His best came at open and its the best position to bat so that shudnt be an excuse . 

Ur forgetting even in his best season his s/r was 128

 

Pant's strike rate in internationals is very poor after a good size of samples. He shouldn't even be in consideration. Some might do better in internationals. Some might do better in the IPL.

Posted
9 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

Pant's strike rate in internationals is very poor after a good size of samples. He shouldn't even be in consideration. Some might do better in internationals. Some might do better in the IPL.

pant has failed in international t20 but u back the enormous talent he has..................

As i said some player pant, rohit will always will get backing becoz coz of extra talent 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...