Jump to content

Seam bowling all rounders


vvvslaxman

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, Need4Speed said:

If we cant get good seam bowling AR then lets get good spin bowling AR..but we need some genuine AR..then we can accomodate extra pace bowler

 

 

Having spin-allrounders + specialist pacers is always the better option.

 

Pace bowling is very taxing and they get injured more often.  

 

7. Spin allrounder 

8. Spin allrounder 

9. Pacer

10. Pacer

11. Pacer

 

is a much better combo.

 

We have lots of proper specialist spinners who can bat at 7 and 8. 

Edited by express bowling
Posted
16 hours ago, express bowling said:

 

 

Having spin-allrounders + specialist pacers is always the better option.

 

Pace bowling is very taxing and they get injured more often.  

 

7. Spin allrounder 

8. Spin allrounder 

9. Pacer

10. Pacer

11. Pacer

 

is a much better combo.

 

We have lots of proper specialist spinners who can bat at 7 and 8. 

I somehow need one wrist spinner in team..finding one who can bat well could be difficult though.,

Posted
Just now, singhvivek141 said:

Rahul Tewatia is one...though he isn't a dependable option as an spinner.

 

Yes..thats the issue..

so far I see other ones:

kuldeep y

rahul c

ravi bish

they all need to improve batting

shreyas gopal was decent I guess in domestic but he has past his prime

need new blood in domestic to fill up that role

 

Posted
16 hours ago, express bowling said:

 

 

Having spin-allrounders + specialist pacers is always the better option.

 

Pace bowling is very taxing and they get injured more often.  

 

7. Spin allrounder 

8. Spin allrounder 

9. Pacer

10. Pacer

11. Pacer

 

is a much better combo.

 

We have lots of proper specialist spinners who can bat at 7 and 8. 

Also for Sena its preferred to go with 4 pacer + 1 spinner..3+2 is very good for indian subcon

Posted
16 hours ago, express bowling said:

 

 

Having spin-allrounders + specialist pacers is always the better option.

 

Pace bowling is very taxing and they get injured more often.  

 

7. Spin allrounder 

8. Spin allrounder 

9. Pacer

10. Pacer

11. Pacer

 

is a much better combo.

 

We have lots of proper specialist spinners who can bat at 7 and 8. 

I would recommend to plan for 7 bowling options....

5-6 should be proper batters who can roll their arm for 4-6 overs.

7-8 we expect them to be able to contribute 25-45 runs with bat and 7-10 overs with ball.

 

Pandya, Washington, Jadeja, Tewatia, Bawa, Rinku, Hangargekar should be in that 5-8 bracket...rotated as and when needed. Shahbaz and Axar are other options.

 

9-11 we will have flexibility to choose

a) 3 pacers amongst Bumrah, Siraj, Kuldeep Sen, Umran, Tyagi, Mohsin

OR

b) 2 pacers + 1 Spinner (Bishnoi, Kuldeep Yadav) depending on conditions and 5-8 combo.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, singhvivek141 said:

I would recommend to plan for 7 bowling options....

5-6 should be proper batters who can roll their arm for 4-6 overs.

7-8 we expect them to be able to contribute 25-45 runs with bat and 7-10 overs with ball.

 

Pandya, Washington, Jadeja, Tewatia, Bawa, Rinku, Hangargekar should be in that 5-8 bracket...rotated as and when needed. Shahbaz and Axar are other options.

 

9-11 we will have flexibility to choose

a) 3 pacers amongst Bumrah, Siraj, Kuldeep Sen, Umran, Tyagi, Mohsin

OR

b) 2 pacers + 1 Spinner (Bishnoi, Kuldeep Yadav) depending on conditions and 5-8 combo.

 

 

7 bowling options is overkill. 7th bowler only needs to be a super-occasional part-timer like shreyas iyer

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Vijy said:

7 bowling options is overkill. 7th bowler only needs to be a super-occasional part-timer like shreyas iyer

right…

7th bowling option would be a luxury if he can bowl but that should not count as a preference in the selection..anyone who is a good batsman should get selected..shouldnt matter if he bowls or not as a 7th option..

One scenario I can think about prefering 7th bowling option is SENA where we can only afford 3 genuine pace bowlers due lack of genuine pace bowl AR..to strengthen batting we may need finger spinner ARs and have extra swing bowling 7th option trundler like..Sanjay Bangar 

that will give us batting till 8th..and bowling options like..

3 genuine pace bowlers+1 trundler (batting AR)who may use swing conditions

2 reliable spinner ARs


if we can somehow get 1 genuine pacer to bat well..we will be a great force who can play 4 genuine pacers..

else jugaadbaazi hi krte rhenge with spinning ARs..batting trundlers etc

Edited by Need4Speed
Posted
4 hours ago, Need4Speed said:

Also for Sena its preferred to go with 4 pacer + 1 spinner..3+2 is very good for indian subcon

 

 

In SENA tests ... yes.

 

Candidates for thd future would be Mohsin, Bawa, Arjun and Hangargekar.

 

This combo maybe needed in some LOIs too. 

Posted

Rahul Tewatia and Venkatesh Iyer should have got more opportunityBoth Rahul and Venkatesh are left handed batsman and both could have bowled 10 overs between them.

Posted
3 minutes ago, tweaker said:

Rahul Tewatia and Venkatesh Iyer should have got more opportunityBoth Rahul and Venkatesh are left handed batsman and both could have bowled 10 overs between them.

Why was Venkatesh Iyer dropped? He just went out of contention for no reason even after doing well in internationals. 

Posted
On 12/29/2022 at 1:41 AM, Pollack said:

Why was Venkatesh Iyer dropped? He just went out of contention for no reason even after doing well in internationals. 

selector incompetence.

Posted
On 12/29/2022 at 12:11 PM, Pollack said:

Why was Venkatesh Iyer dropped? He just went out of contention for no reason even after doing well in internationals. 

One poor IPL season and dropped. Or maybe just a fill in option for Pandya.

Posted
1 hour ago, Majestic said:

One poor IPL season and dropped. Or maybe just a fill in option for Pandya.

His role should have been diffrent from Pandya.As he is left handed and he can bat at any position.He would have been handy as fifth seamer in.Ireland,England, Zimbabwe,West Indies

Posted
23 hours ago, Majestic said:

One poor IPL season and dropped. Or maybe just a fill in option for Pandya.

yes, he was seen as a placeholder.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...