Jump to content

When Samson did well in NZ ODIs, why did they not include him?


Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, vvvslaxman said:

 

I think SKY is in place of him. SKY has this X factor something nobody else has. So he needs a run. 

At the moment, it is KLR who is "Kabab me Haddi" for everyone at no.5.

Posted
9 minutes ago, Majestic said:

At the moment, it is KLR who is "Kabab me Haddi" for everyone at no.5.

 

He is not going anywhere. He is there under the pretext of "backup wicket keeper" who can open.

Posted
6 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

He is not going anywhere. He is there under the pretext of "backup wicket keeper" who can open.

very true.  As much as I am also frustrated with him, that guy has just so much batting ability and skill, but repeatedly goes through long poor patches.  Its a testament to his lack of mental strength.  Players with half his ability have made careers 5x better than his.

Posted (edited)

I think he has been pigeon-holed as a keeper, so he loses out to Pant on talent alone. TM will have to look at him as a pure batsman in order for him to get a run. However some of the other pure batsmen are also considered talented, and those slots are equally competitive to get.

Edited by Tibarn
Posted

too much competition in MO. the mentally fragile Kela takes up a slot, and Pandu takes one more and so will Jaddu/Sundar. that leaves little for pant, samson, SKY, Iyer.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...