Jump to content

The Ashes 2023


zen

Ashes and Diamonds  

26 members have voted

  1. 1. Who will triumph?


This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 07/07/23 at 04:00 PM

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

No you need to have skill. You cannot randomly field a set of bowlers and  expect them to repeat what Broad has been doing over a decade. He has over 100 wickets against Australia in England at 26.  We played on a flat wicket too.  Our batting is just not as good as Australia's.  In current form even out of form Smith >>>> Virat Kohli,  Head >>> Kahane, Gujara.

Smith's avg is 31 and Once they figured out Head's weakness , he did not have any great innings.Pujara scored the same amount of runs in his last five test  in England  series as Head with same number of 50s with same average,

 

These Aussies are struggling to reach 280. I gave this Aussie team way too much credit initially but they are a very timid side who were there to be taken.

 

Edited by putrevus
Posted
Just now, putrevus said:

Smith's avg is 31 and Once they figured out Head's weakness , he did not have any great innings.Pujara scored the same amount of runs in his last five test  in England  series as Head with same number of 50s with same average,

 

These Aussies are struggling to reach 280.

 

Even India was 98/5 against England. Pant and Jaddu helped us take the lead.  It is not like our batting is blameless here. We have been failing overseas for 3 years. Bowlers started failing once inform Bumrah/Ishant/Shami combo came apart. We didn't find a replacement for that. Shami was not that good in England even before. Umesh neve rhad a good track record against AUstralia. Thakur is at best 1st change bowler. Siraj was the only in form. But unfortunately he doesn't know how to set up bastmen. Even the 600 wicket taker Anderson was struggling against Australia. Guys like Woakes, Wood have to bring their skills along with Broad in spurts to handle Aussie batting unit.

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

Even India was 98/5 against England. Pant and Jaddu helped us take the lead.  It is not like our batting is blameless here. We have been failing overseas for 3 years. Bowlers started failing once inform Bumrah/Ishant/Shami combo came apart. We didn't find a replacement for that. Shami was not that good in England even before. Umesh neve rhad a good track record against AUstralia. Thakur is at best 1st change bowler. Siraj was the only in form. But unfortunately he doesn't know how to set up bastmen. Even the 600 wicket taker Anderson was struggling against Australia. Guys like Woakes, Wood have to bring their skills along with Broad in spurts to handle Aussie batting unit.

Still Indian batting and Aussie batting have almost similar avg.

 

Pant's avg in those 4 tests was 38 and jadeja's 31.00.

 

Indian batting has been bad but bowlers are ones who have been losing tests and series.

 

Indian bowling needs to get better, I don't think Indian batsmen like Gill and co will scoring 500 plus runs in England any time in near future.

Edited by putrevus
Posted
Just now, putrevus said:

Still Indian batting and Aussie batting have almost similar avg.

 

Pant's avg in those 4 tests was 38 and jadeja's 31.00.

 

Indian batting has been bad but bowlers are ones who have been losing tests and series.


We are still ranked no.1 in the world. Made 2 finals. It is mostly because of bowlers and  Bowlers who can bat. Not batsmen.

Posted
Just now, Tillu said:

Happens when a lot of money is riding on you. Reason why our batsmen feel so much pressure during knock outs.

 

spacer.png

 

 

Pressure of being 1050 crore rich? :) lol If anything these guys should play with absolute freedom. Someone like KOhli should have zero pressure. He has the money. He has the fan following. He has the PR machinery. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:


We are still ranked no.1 in the world. Made 2 finals. It is mostly because of bowlers and  Bowlers who can bat. Not batsmen.

No we made it to two finals based on our spinning allrounders and their performances at home.

Posted
1 minute ago, putrevus said:

No we made it to two finals based on our spinning allrounders and their performances at home.

 

It is not enough if you win just at home.You have to win overseas as well. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:


We are still ranked no.1 in the world. Made 2 finals. It is mostly because of bowlers and  Bowlers who can bat. Not batsmen.

This. Lower order batsmen have bailed us out so many times 

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Sgattick10 said:

This. Lower order batsmen have bailed us out so many times 

 

 

SHami/Bumrah partnership at Lords.  Thakur/Sundar at Gabba.  Thakur again at the Oval with twin fifties. Ashwin/Iyer at Mirpur. Ashwin/Axar in the msot recent series adding 114 runs. Jadeja and Pant.

Edited by vvvslaxman
Posted
Just now, Nikhil_cric said:

Bazball is the smokescreen. The real question is how England keep getting the ball to move for lengthy periods of time - whether its conventional here or reverse in Pakistan?

 

DUke ball has been exhibitingg this behavior for a while. Even we had that benefit. Just that these guys are too experienceed to set up bastmen patiently. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...