Jump to content

Duleep Trophy


tweaker

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, singhvivek141 said:

Mukesh Kumar ji had scores century.
Saini baba too isn't far behind

Saini is worse.  With his pace and height, he should be doing a lot better .    

 

Has no control whatsoever. 

Posted
Just now, Nikhil_cric said:

Eternal story of Indian cricket.   High pace bowlers lack elite control .   Guys with control are short trundlers like Aaqib Khan :facepalm:

High pace bowlers are hyped so much so much that they stop working on control.

 

Control at 145 is much effective than wayward 150

 

image.png

Posted
8 minutes ago, Nikhil_cric said:

Saini is worse.  With his pace and height, he should be doing a lot better .    

 

Has no control whatsoever. 

Saini is finished, there was no need of playing him again.
He is 32 years old, we shouldn't play 30+ year old pacers who are yet to establish themselves. Better move to younger bowlers.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Nikhil_cric said:

Eternal story of Indian cricket.   High pace bowlers lack elite control .   Guys with control are short trundlers like Aaqib Khan :facepalm:

Even the trundlers lack control. Its just they are less crucified and blamed coz in India we have somewhat "moderate" way of dealing them.
Maybe we feel nostalgic when we see a trundler, as they have been since the day India is playing cricket.

Posted
Just now, singhvivek141 said:

Even the trundlers lack control. Its just they are less crucified and blamed coz in India we have somewhat "moderate" way of dealing them.
Maybe we feel nostalgic when we see a trundler, as they have been since the day India is playing cricket.

Many trundlers don't have control. But the only  ones with any control happen to be trundlers.

 

Bumrah and Shami of the last year or two are the only bowlers who had 140 + pace and bowled a high percentage on a good line and length for a reasonable period of time. 

 

 

 

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Nikhil_cric said:

Many trundlers don't have control. But the only  ones with any control happen to be trundlers.

 

Bumrah and Shami of the last year or two are the only bowlers who had 140 + pace and bowled a high percentage on a good line and length for a reasonable period of time. 

 

 

 

 

Bumrah, Shami...from new bowlers Mayank has good control. Even Umran too isn't as wayward, his lengths are a problem but his line is correct most of the time hence he gets LBW and bowled often.
From past quicks, Srinath too had good control despite being quite fast.
Tyagi is wayward, no doubt about it. Sen has better control than Umesh.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Nikhil_cric said:

Many trundlers don't have control. But the only  ones with any control happen to be trundlers.

 

Bumrah and Shami of the last year or two are the only bowlers who had 140 + pace and bowled a high percentage on a good line and length for a reasonable period of time. 

 

 

 

 

 

Akash Deep looks decent. Umesh was also good in India.

Posted
1 minute ago, singhvivek141 said:

Bumrah, Shami...from new bowlers Mayank has good control. Even Umran too isn't as wayward, his lengths are a problem but his line is correct most of the time hence he gets LBW and bowled often.
From past quicks, Srinath too had good control despite being quite fast.
Tyagi is wayward, no doubt about it. Sen has better control than Umesh.

I'm talking about elite control. Like 40 % and upwards  good line and length stuff. 

 

From whatever data I have seen, a large number of Australian seamers have all had that level of accuracy .

 

Even their 2nd string guys like Stuart Clark and Jackson Bird bowl that accurately. 

 

That level of mechanical efficiency is lacking in most of our bowlers. 

 

 

 

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Nikhil_cric said:

I'm talking about elite control. Like 40 % and upwards  good line and length stuff. 

 

From whatever data I have seen, a large number of Australian seamers have all had that level of accuracy .

 

Even their 2nd string guys like Stuart Clark and Jackson Bird bowl that accurately. 

 

That level of mechanical efficiency is lacking in most of our bowlers. 


From current crop, Cummins and Hazelwood are accurate. Starc isn't, just that the pressure create by other 2 are enough for Starc to survive.
In SA, the era of Steyn, Morkel and Philander was the one where all 3 were accurate.
For India, Bumrah and Shami are accurate, Siraj too has reasonably good control. 

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, singhvivek141 said:


From current crop, Cummins and Hazelwood are accurate. Starc isn't, just that the pressure create by other 2 are enough for Starc to survive.
In SA, the era of Steyn, Morkel and Philander was the one where all 3 were accurate.
For India, Bumrah and Shami are accurate, Siraj too has reasonably good control. 

Yeah Starc isn't but Boland is very accurate. They have a plethora of accurate bowlers .

 

Morkel had everything going for him except accuracy. 

 

An accurate Morkel would have been a scary bowler. 

 

To be fair it's only OZ who produce so many accurate bowlers. 

 

No other nation seems to produce as many. 

Edited by Nikhil_cric

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...