Jump to content

Breaking news squad for ct and england series announced


vayuu1

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Trichromatic said:

How did Pant enter this ODI side directly?

 

Directly? He was always part of the squad, took it back after he recovered

Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

For that to happen India has to lose to 2 teams. Pakistan/NZ/BD  2 from that list.

This could happen 

 

India beats Pak and BD

NZ beats IND and BD

PAK beats NZ and BD

 

3 teams tied at 2 with better NRR going ahead

Edited by The Hound
Posted

I just wish Gill and Jaiswal open the batting. They will be an awesome pair. It doesn't matter who captains or vice-captains the team. Rinku Singh and Dhruv Jurel have been absolutely robbed. They are at the peak of their batting abilities and should've been played in ODIs. Similarly, NKR and Siraj have done nothing wrong and deserved a place. Alas, Ro-Ko-Pant continue to get the limelight. ICT are not even trying special spinners apart from Kuldeep Yadav, who failed to show at WC '23. Varun Chakravarthy and Kumar Kartikeya are options to be had. Anyhow, I only hope the team follows a batting-hard strategy:

 

Gill, Jaiswal

Rohit Sharma, Jadeja, Kohli

KL Rahul, Sundar, Hardik Pandya

Shami, Arshdeep, Kuldeep

 

They lack power-hitters: Hardik isn't at his best, KL Rahul doesn't have the strike-rate in ODIs, and Rohit Sharma can't hit sixes like he used to. The difference between his and Rinku's speed shows ICT's priorities. Shami has hopelessly gained weight, so I hope he can field well in the CT.

Posted (edited)

Selection is appaling. They have picked four spinners and 3 pacers one of them Shami while it should have been opposite. More chances of pacers getting injured and needing replacement than spinners. Only one of jaddu and axar was required.

Edited by rkt.india
Posted
4 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

Selection is appealing. They have picked four spinners and 3 pacers one of them Shami while it should have been opposite. More chances of pacers getting injured and needing replacement than spinners. Only one of jaddu and axar was required.

Jaddu's selection is idiotic, hopefully the only reason of selecting him is to use him as a substitute fielder.

Posted
3 minutes ago, The Hound said:

 

 

 

I am a big fan of Rishab Pant but tbh Samson deserved the selection.

 

Samson should have been selected over Kl Rahul as our main keeper batsman.

 

Pant hasn't been scintillating in the limited overs format, in ODis he is still good and was getting better before he met with that  accident, in t20is we don't need Pant.

 

 

Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, Adamant said:

Also, Hardik deserved the vice captaincy ahead of Gill, Rohit Sharma is insecure.

I don't think who the captain is, matters much. He never deserved a spot in this team which is what he is insecure about.

Edited by Chamsi
Posted
4 minutes ago, Vicks57 said:

 

Iyer will be a failure in 2027 ODI WC in SA. Guy can't play short balls to save his life.

 

Hardik should be VC.

yes Iyer should never have been picked but clearly they are picking him. If so atleast utilise his captaincy chops. 

 

Hardik is injury prone maybe thats the reason

Posted
5 minutes ago, Vicks57 said:

 

So Iyer is kinda like Rohit in test cricket then. Don't deserve to be in the squad but be VC or C

 

No thanks 

 

'If' in the squad then VC or C, bt preferably not in sqaud

Posted
1 minute ago, Vicks57 said:

 

It sets a bad precedent. Don't you think so?

 

It does, but we know hes not getting dropped anyway. Ideally should not have been picked for CT itself. We need to build for WC 2027

Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, Vicks57 said:

Some news channels are reporting Gambhir wanted Samson but Agarkar and Rohit did not want him.

 

Based on the votes 2-1 against Samson, he was not selected.

 

Now Gambhir has said that Sarfraz leaked the team problems in Australia.:cantstop:

“There was no Sarfaraz Khan in the meeting”: Former player tells Gautam Gambhir to stop playing blame game"

 

https://crictoday.com/cricket/news/there-was-no-sarfaraz-khan-in-the-meeting-former-player-tells-gautam-gambhir-to-stop-playing-blame-game/

 

 

Edited by New guy
Posted
28 minutes ago, Vicks57 said:

Some news channels are reporting Gambhir wanted Samson but Agarkar and Rohit did not want him.

 

Based on the votes 2-1 against Samson, he was not selected.

 

Now Gambhir has said that Sarfraz leaked the team problems in Australia.:cantstop:

Samson was performing well in odis bt got dropped from the team because he failed in a few t20s(?). Format illiteracy is a problem with Indian team selections which is why Sky got picked for a test series when he had no business being picked. If it is true then the desire for Samson is based on souund logic. 

Anyways Samson is getting into the team because of RR PR, not domestic performances. 

Posted
30 minutes ago, Vicks57 said:

Another news is that Gauti did not want Gill to be Vice captain.

 

Agarkar and Rohit insisted on Gill being VC :facepalm:

I have not seen Gill demonstrate any ability to read the game well, ofc we don't have any sample size for this either seeing from outside. Pandya would've been a better choice but he is very injury prone. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, New guy said:

And gambhir gets blamed when he gets over ruled every time.

 

What happened to his 'tough' aggressive attitude of not taking any BS? Why is he taking everything meekly.

Posted
1 hour ago, Lord said:

What happened to his 'tough' aggressive attitude of not taking any BS? Why is he taking everything meekly.

Gambhir has a toxic personality and ends up picking a fight in any environment he spends time in. Nothing has changed on that front. To see a manager throw  young players under the bus as he did with Pant and Sarfaraz is an instant sacking offence as far as I am concerned.  On top of this toxic persona, he had no coaching credentials whatsoever. If he had been successful with the Indian team it would have had to involve a fluke. As it stands, it seems a significant step backwards from Dravid.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...