sage Posted December 25, 2025 Posted December 25, 2025 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/cricket/2025/12/24/englands-ashes-wins-australia-ollie-pope-no-3s/ In England and beyond, Test-match No 3s are in an age of recession. Overall, they averaged 34.9 in the 2020s, a 8.5 run decline since the 2000s. Test No 3s average less in the 2020s than in any decade since the 1910s. The role long exerted a gravitational, almost mythical, pull. It was the platform for Sir Donald Bradman to amass his preposterous numbers. Ricky Ponting, Ian Chappell, Viv Richards, Brian Lara, Kumar Sangakkara and Rahul Dravid are among Test cricket’s other great custodians of the position. Yet now, its status has reversed: from a position to seek out, it is increasingly viewed as an unwanted burden. Virat Kohli, Steve Smith and Joe Root – three of the “Fab Four” born at the start of the 1990s – all had stints there before moving to the safer climes of No 4. When he was promoted to three in the 2023 Ashes, Harry Brook only did the job for a solitary innings before immediately shuffling back to five in the second innings. Moeen Ali was elevated then, making the leap from seven to three mid-match, and then remaining at first wicket down for the rest of the series. The move was an example of one of Test cricket’s more curious trends: the rise of the “false three”. Rather than it being the preserve of batting royalty, non-specialists are increasingly used in the position. Such players, normally all-rounders, are deployed to artificially lengthen the batting order and shield the middle order from the new ball. If all players struggle at three, such logic goes, then a side’s best batsman should be protected from the berth. Wiaan Mulder is the standard-bearer for the false three: he averages 22.8 in 21 World Test Championship matches, yet is South Africa’s incumbent No 3. The world over, a lethal cocktail has sent No 3s’ averages south. There are an array of brilliant fast bowlers in the Test game, adept at exploiting new-ball assistance. Especially in Australia, pitches have become spicier with the new ball. Changes to the balls themselves have also made the position increasingly undesirable. During the 2021-22 Australian home summer, a new Kookaburra ball was introduced. The ball has a more prominent seam than previous versions, and an extra layer of lacquer. The upshot has been an increase in both swing and seam with the new ball, leading to top-order averages plummeting. Even Marnus Labuschagne was dropped earlier this year, after averaging just 24.7 in his previous 16 Tests.
sage Posted December 26, 2025 Author Posted December 26, 2025 The data that shows batting No.3 is tougher than ever Table with 6 columns and 16 rows. (column headers with buttons are sortable) Decade Players Matches Inns Runs Average 1870s 7 3 11 192 17.45 17.45 17.45 1880s 26 29 104 2,143 22.09 22.09 22.09 1890s 30 32 116 3,725 33.86 33.86 33.86 1900s 30 41 153 4,726 31.93 31.93 31.93 1910s 29 29 100 3,279 33.80 33.80 33.80 1920s 48 51 174 7,038 43.71 43.71 43.71 1930s 72 89 307 14,453 51.25 51.25 51.25 1940s 39 45 156 6,233 42.69 42.69 42.69 1950s 100 164 581 20,266 37.04 37.04 37.04 1960s 95 186 669 26,212 41.47 41.47 41.47 1970s 87 198 710 27,116 40.17 40.17 40.17 1980s 116 266 909 32,177 38.07 38.07 38.07 1990s 130 347 1,217 40,857 35.99 35.99 35.99 2000s 138 464 1,649 66,861 43.41 43.41 43.41 2010s 152 433 1,586 59,690 39.81 39.81 39.81 2020s 113 237 877 29,090 34.96 34.96 34.96 Rondu 1
kosingh Posted December 26, 2025 Posted December 26, 2025 Just now, sage said: The data that shows batting No.3 is tougher than ever Table with 6 columns and 16 rows. (column headers with buttons are sortable) Decade Players Matches Inns Runs Average 1870s 7 3 11 192 17.45 17.45 17.45 1880s 26 29 104 2,143 22.09 22.09 22.09 1890s 30 32 116 3,725 33.86 33.86 33.86 1900s 30 41 153 4,726 31.93 31.93 31.93 1910s 29 29 100 3,279 33.80 33.80 33.80 1920s 48 51 174 7,038 43.71 43.71 43.71 1930s 72 89 307 14,453 51.25 51.25 51.25 1940s 39 45 156 6,233 42.69 42.69 42.69 1950s 100 164 581 20,266 37.04 37.04 37.04 1960s 95 186 669 26,212 41.47 41.47 41.47 1970s 87 198 710 27,116 40.17 40.17 40.17 1980s 116 266 909 32,177 38.07 38.07 38.07 1990s 130 347 1,217 40,857 35.99 35.99 35.99 2000s 138 464 1,649 66,861 43.41 43.41 43.41 2010s 152 433 1,586 59,690 39.81 39.81 39.81 2020s 113 237 877 29,090 34.96 34.96 34.96 Haven't averages at most specialist batting positions declined from 2000s to 2010, and then 2010 to 2020s? Vk1 1
vvvslaxman Posted December 26, 2025 Posted December 26, 2025 (edited) I have removed Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Ireland from this. Just the other countries. Edited December 26, 2025 by vvvslaxman sage 1
Talkie Posted December 26, 2025 Posted December 26, 2025 Batting today is tougher than in 90s. Good revelation.
Lord Posted December 26, 2025 Posted December 26, 2025 13 hours ago, Talkie said: Batting today is tougher than in 90s. Good revelation. That might also due to faulty techniques due to T20s cricspirit and diga 2
vvvslaxman Posted December 26, 2025 Posted December 26, 2025 2 minutes ago, Lord said: That might also due to faulty techniques due to T20s Harmison is saying exactly the same thing on talksport. I am watching it right now https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdS6Wd3Q93Q Lord 1
G_B_ Posted December 26, 2025 Posted December 26, 2025 We need to see if the top 5 averages have dipped. Then its a t20 impact+ pitches and needing a result. I also note that best batters now prefer to come at 4 to 5 to face a blunted new ball. Lord 1
kosingh Posted December 26, 2025 Posted December 26, 2025 3 hours ago, G_B_ said: We need to see if the top 5 averages have dipped. Then its a t20 impact+ pitches and needing a result. I also note that best batters now prefer to come at 4 to 5 to face a blunted new ball. Exactly. Pretty sure to total team scores have reduced in that period. If number 3 averages have fallen even more than other positions, only then would these stats be meaningful...
vvvslaxman Posted December 27, 2025 Posted December 27, 2025 Amla, Williamson, Sanga, Pujara later Labu are the main no.3s in the last 15 years
diga Posted December 27, 2025 Posted December 27, 2025 5 hours ago, Lord said: That might also due to faulty techniques due to T20s Probably a few transition years before every team finds someone suitable for that position... Talkie 1
BacktoCricaddict Posted December 27, 2025 Posted December 27, 2025 The greatest innings ever played by a #3 was by a "false" #3. Circa March 2001.
Talkie Posted December 27, 2025 Posted December 27, 2025 36 minutes ago, sage said: Now Carse played at #3. Truly over That should be strategy going forward. Send nightwatchmen to face the new ball regularly and give your number 3 better chance to survive. Rondu 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now