IndianRenegade Posted February 20 Posted February 20 (edited) Already English cucks crying racism & it’s their local cricket tournament, but it never occurs to them when they sanction other countries or India for buying Russian products for their local consumption, it is unfair to those countries. cucks will talk about morality that doesn’t exist. Edited February 20 by IndianRenegade raki05 1
Tillu Posted February 21 Posted February 21 Indian owners should never invest in the domestic leagues of England and Australia. They will always use Pakistan as an excuse to needle us. raki05 1
bsriharsha Posted February 21 Author Posted February 21 https://www.cricbuzz.com/cricket-news/137815/agha-shaheen-usman-among-63-pakistan-players-to-register-for-hundred-2026-auction-cricbuzzcom Cricbuzz says 6 out of 8 teams have Indian connections and are not likely to pick Pakistani players. And 63 Pakistani players apply to register ? Kaun hai wo 63 players ?
bsriharsha Posted February 21 Author Posted February 21 Michael Vaughan, writing for DT: Argued that if reports are true that new Indian owners in The Hundred will refuse to select Pakistani players, it would undermine the competition’s credibility and inclusivity. He stressed that Pakistani cricketers have historically been central to English cricket, citing legends like Imran Khan, Wasim Akram, and Waqar Younis. Vaughan warned that excluding them could alienate England’s large Pakistani community and contradict ECB chairman Richard Thompson’s stated aim of making cricket the most inclusive sport in the country. He criticized the ECB’s vague response and said the real test will come at the March auction, where 62 Pakistani players are registered. Token signings won’t be enough—if Indian-owned franchises avoid them altogether, it will show who truly controls the competition. Vaughan added that if India can face Pakistan in World Cups, Indian owners should also be able to pick Pakistani players in overseas leagues. He cautioned that such a precedent could eventually affect British-born players of Pakistani heritage, like Adil Rashid or Rehan Ahmed, and questioned whether the ECB would be strong enough to stand up to franchise owners. While acknowledging genuine issues like Pakistan’s scheduling conflicts and PCB restrictions, Vaughan insisted that political reasons for exclusion must not be tolerated in the UK, as they would damage both Pakistan cricket and the inclusivity of English cricket itself. Vaughan - The moral figurehead of the English game.
Michael Vaughan, writing for DT: Argued that if reports are true that new Indian owners in The Hundred will refuse to select Pakistani players, it would undermine the competition’s credibility and inclusivity. He stressed that Pakistani cricketers have historically been central to English cricket, citing legends like Imran Khan, Wasim Akram, and Waqar Younis. Vaughan warned that excluding them could alienate England’s large Pakistani community and contradict ECB chairman Richard Thompson’s stated aim of making cricket the most inclusive sport in the country. He criticized the ECB’s vague response and said the real test will come at the March auction, where 62 Pakistani players are registered. Token signings won’t be enough—if Indian-owned franchises avoid them altogether, it will show who truly controls the competition. Vaughan added that if India can face Pakistan in World Cups, Indian owners should also be able to pick Pakistani players in overseas leagues. He cautioned that such a precedent could eventually affect British-born players of Pakistani heritage, like Adil Rashid or Rehan Ahmed, and questioned whether the ECB would be strong enough to stand up to franchise owners. While acknowledging genuine issues like Pakistan’s scheduling conflicts and PCB restrictions, Vaughan insisted that political reasons for exclusion must not be tolerated in the UK, as they would damage both Pakistan cricket and the inclusivity of English cricket itself. Vaughan - The moral figurehead of the English game.
RajBan Posted February 21 Posted February 21 A section of British society has turned out to be cuck. They should all move into Bradford or may even go to Pakistan if they are so fascinated with their mothers, sisters, wives and daughters getting groomed by gang of the cult followers. raki05 and Laaloo 1 1
singhvivek141 Posted February 21 Posted February 21 51 minutes ago, bsriharsha said: https://www.cricbuzz.com/cricket-news/137815/agha-shaheen-usman-among-63-pakistan-players-to-register-for-hundred-2026-auction-cricbuzzcom Cricbuzz says 6 out of 8 teams have Indian connections and are not likely to pick Pakistani players. And 63 Pakistani players apply to register ? Kaun hai wo 63 players ? Some random Usman tariqs, who would find every possible excuse to get out of that filthy nation only to spoil other countries equally. raki05 1
bsriharsha Posted February 21 Author Posted February 21 There are only 3 teams who would want an overseas spinner. The 4th team has Santner as an all-rounder, why would they pick a Pakistani spinner ? Birmingham might go for a Pakistani spinner but they already have Rehan Ahmed.
bsriharsha Posted February 21 Author Posted February 21 The fume on PeePee and social media is unreal. Boiled piss.
bsriharsha Posted February 21 Author Posted February 21 4 hours ago, Tillu said: Indian owners should never invest in the domestic leagues of England and Australia. They will always use Pakistan as an excuse to needle us. Nah. Arabs bought man City and Newcastle. They use it to sportwash and improve reputations etc etc. Indian companies should possibly do the same as well. I do think that they probably should pick a Pakistani player if he fits their team vision though. But it's still fun seeing the self proclaimed victims boiling their piss at the injustice.
bsriharsha Posted February 21 Author Posted February 21 Those Pakistanis have the hand in the narrative. And that clearly shows in the bbc article. That bbc article is about trying to armtwist the franchises into picking Pakistani players. Just bribe the journalist. It will be clickbait in anyway.
bsriharsha Posted February 21 Author Posted February 21 And from a cricketing perspective, Usman Tariq is liable to get reported for chucking if he gets to bowl there. Who's going to pay money to hire a chucker. And which other cricketers do Pakistanis have whose positions aren't already filled. Keep in mind that it's a maximum of 4 overseas player in a squad (not 8 as in the case of IPL) and two of the 4 are already filled by retaining existing players.
goose Posted February 21 Posted February 21 the english cricket scene including vaughan and the watching public have a voice in this. they are the customer - without them there is no hundred and there is no IPL owned franchise. the owners should come out immediately and say pakistan players will be up for selection in the hundred just like everyone else. as a british indian keep your discrimination away from the uk. there's one thing the british are good at. covert racism. learn!
bsriharsha Posted February 21 Author Posted February 21 7 minutes ago, goose said: the english cricket scene including vaughan and the watching public have a voice in this. they are the customer - without them there is no hundred and there is no IPL owned franchise. the owners should come out immediately and say pakistan players will be up for selection in the hundred just like everyone else. as a british indian keep your discrimination away from the uk. there's one thing the british are good at. covert racism. learn! So. The owners can well come and say that we don't see the player as a proper fit
goose Posted February 21 Posted February 21 3 minutes ago, bsriharsha said: So. The owners can well come and say that we don't see the player as a proper fit pick them. if they are REALLY good ok you have a decision to make. you dont have to implement in season one when the whole world is watching. england with all it's history has tried very hard to maintain a facade of equality - note i said facade. these IPL oners need to read the room
goose Posted February 21 Posted February 21 13 hours ago, IndianRenegade said: Already English cucks crying racism & it’s their local cricket tournament, but it never occurs to them when they sanction other countries or India for buying Russian products for their local consumption, it is unfair to those countries. cucks will talk about morality that doesn’t exist. england has not sanctioned india for buying russian oil.
LordPrabhzy Posted February 21 Posted February 21 56 minutes ago, goose said: the english cricket scene including vaughan and the watching public have a voice in this. they are the customer - without them there is no hundred and there is no IPL owned franchise. the owners should come out immediately and say pakistan players will be up for selection in the hundred just like everyone else. as a british indian keep your discrimination away from the uk. there's one thing the british are good at. covert racism. learn! not sure why are crying hard for rubbish pakistani players? But i think for them the Brit Pak satusfaction and the need to be seen as not racist is trumping their position on India related stakeholders- clearly seen when a lot of the last 5-10 year selection of brown players has been muslim or pak muslims. Indian origin players have completely stopped being selected for England raki05 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now