vvvslaxman Posted December 11, 2009 Posted December 11, 2009 Consistency is very vital. Raina despite his problem against short ball, despite playing thankless role (accelerating at the death) is more consistent than this Rohit Sharma.
nballa Posted December 11, 2009 Author Posted December 11, 2009 Consistency is very vital. Raina despite his problem against short ball' date=' despite playing thankless role (accelerating at the death) is more consistent than this Rohit Sharma.[/quote'] consistency will come when he is persisted with, tendulkar hit his first odi century after playing 70 games. problem is fake fans like you and the rest of the people posting on this board are very impatient.
Indianfan_Hyd Posted December 11, 2009 Posted December 11, 2009 consistency will come when he is persisted with' date=' tendulkar hit his first odi century after playing 70 games. problem is fake fans like you and the rest of the people posting on this board are very impatient.[/quote'] Tendulkar played many important inns in those first 70 matches In case RS he shd have been given a continuous run at 1 down or 2 down before discarding him. Coach/Captain shd have set him challenges /targets because he doesnt seem like a self motivated run hungry kinda guy. Though I feel he is not upto it at present. May be he will be a late bloomer like Hayden. Even Laxman started scoring consistently when he was arnd 27/28.
youngindia Posted December 11, 2009 Posted December 11, 2009 Tendulkar played many important inns in those first 70 matches . this kind of shallow analysis is a put off. the point is maturity comes stage by stage. just because you suffer a sophomore slump, that does n't mean you are a late bloomer. rohit is on track. hayden made a one day debut in 1993,failed quite mutiple times and finally established in 2001 in india. players differ in the rate of maturity.it depends on a case by case basis.
99.94 Posted December 12, 2009 Posted December 12, 2009 Temperament with little talent is better than talent with little temperament. I'd rather have talent and little temperament :two_thumbs_up:
Sachinism Posted December 12, 2009 Posted December 12, 2009 He'll play for India maybe 5 years down the line
graphic23 Posted December 12, 2009 Posted December 12, 2009 1. He's extremely unfit. 2. Spends no time at the wicket. 3. Airy drives != class.
Clarke Posted December 12, 2009 Posted December 12, 2009 Rohit Sharma who ? I'd rather have Irfan Pathan in my squad, a decent batsman and a useful fifth bowler to say the least.
The Dark Horse Posted December 12, 2009 Posted December 12, 2009 I'd not waste another hard working youngster's opportunity having Rohit Sharma. Noone will ever get the numerous opportunities that he has enjoyed/wasted. I'd rather have a Pujara/Vijay/Kohli.
cowboysfan Posted December 12, 2009 Posted December 12, 2009 Rohit Sharma doesnt have "it" to be a international cricketer.
vvvslaxman Posted December 12, 2009 Posted December 12, 2009 consistency will come when he is persisted with' date=' tendulkar hit his first odi century after playing 70 games. problem is fake fans like you and the rest of the people posting on this board are very impatient.[/quote'] We are not bereft of quality players like Pakistan to persist with mediocrity :hysterical:
nballa Posted December 12, 2009 Author Posted December 12, 2009 Rohit Sharma doesnt have "it" to be a international cricketer. the last i know the guy helped us win the odi tri-series in australia, facing the likes of brett lee. what has "ravindra jadeja" done?
Cricketics Posted December 12, 2009 Posted December 12, 2009 He has everything in him to be an international cricketer. He is one of the most elegant players which there are not enough on this planet. He is one of those rare ones who has that class in him. He is special, but he has to make it count by improving his temperament. The longer he stays on crease, the more he will average
flamy Posted December 12, 2009 Posted December 12, 2009 Rohit Sharma who ? I'd rather have Irfan Pathan in my squad' date=' a decent batsman and a useful fifth bowler to say the least.[/quote'] Clarke who?
Clarke Posted December 12, 2009 Posted December 12, 2009 Clarke who? The one thats more pragmatic than u .. matches and trophies are not won on class/talent, they're won on performances.
cowboysfan Posted December 12, 2009 Posted December 12, 2009 He has everything in him to be an international cricketer. He is one of the most elegant players which there are not enough on this planet. He is one of those rare ones who has that class in him. He is special, but he has to make it count by improving his temperament. The longer he stays on crease, the more he will average so far he has shown no temperament to last long in an innings ,just look at the way he gets out after he gets a start.I really wanted him to succeed but he doesnt deserve it.
flamy Posted December 12, 2009 Posted December 12, 2009 The one thats more pragmatic than u .. matches and trophies are not won on class/talent' date=' they're won on performances.[/quote'] pragmatic phagmatic. Be like water.
graphic23 Posted December 12, 2009 Posted December 12, 2009 Meh. Rohit's been given enough chances. He has a mediocre record apart from his form in 2008 March. He's failed quite badly, with the # of chances he's got. It's a shame that Kohli is not being given a run or doesn't get selected as often as he deserves to.
flamy Posted December 12, 2009 Posted December 12, 2009 ^ I know, dude. Kohli has got it so tough so far. How the feck is Jadeja in the team. Kohli can bowl too (for T20s atleast :P) and is an awesome fielder
champ Posted December 12, 2009 Posted December 12, 2009 gett in uttappa in t20s .. he deserves more chances .. :protest: he has played against best in his short career and done well ..
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now