Zap_Brannigan Posted August 31, 2010 Posted August 31, 2010 Came across the daily mail article on pay gap and saw the annual retainer each board pays its members. Australia: £400,000 England: £400,000 South Africa: £105,000 India: £82,500 West Indies: £77,250 Sri Lanka: £77,250 Pakistan: £22,500 Bangladesh: £12,000 As you can see Aus and Eng earn much much more than us and even lesser boards like Sri lanka and WI pay as much as BCCI does to our players. Moreover, the £82,500 for India is only for Grade A players (9 players ) while the rest gets 55k or lower. This is the retained players list, Grade A (9 players) : Sachin Tendulkar, MS Dhoni, Gautam Gambhir, Virender Sehwag, Rahul Dravid, VVS Laxman, Yuvraj Singh, Zaheer Khan, Harbhajan Singh Grade B (7 players) : Suresh Raina, Rohit Sharma, Munaf Patel, RP Singh, Ishant Sharma, Praveen Kumar, Ashish Nehra Grade C (8 players) : S Badrinath, Wasim Jaffer, Irfan Pathan, Yusuf Pathan, Pragyan Ojha, Sreesanth, Dinesh Karthik, Amit Mishra Grade D (17 players) : Piyush Chawla, Ravindra Jadeja, Robin Uthappa, Parthiv Patel, Cheteshwar Pujara, Mohammad Kaif, Virat Kohli, Ashok Dinda, Wriddhiman Saha, M Vijay, R Ashwin, Shikhar Dhawan, Sudeep Tyagi, Dhawal Kulkarni, Abhishek Nayar, Ajinkya Rahane, Manoj Tiwary Although we probably have a lot more players on annual retainer than other boards, Grade D pays a pittance of 20000£. I know Dhoni gets 10 million $ per year from just his sponsorship and IPL contract but BCCI payment for playing for India seems so low. What is the match fees these players get? The dailymail article says that the players gets 26% of BCCI revenue, which is the highest for any board, but how are the players getting it? Don't turn this into "BCCI are thieves" thread. I am just wondering how the players are getting the 26% cut in BCCI profits.
someone Posted August 31, 2010 Posted August 31, 2010 I do not agree The Indian cricketers wages is already over the average indian wage and indian living standards are much cheaper than those other countries. Plus they receive huge sponsors account.
IKnowU Posted August 31, 2010 Posted August 31, 2010 Fake. You really think BCCI openly flaunt thse details? I swear cricinfo had a article giving much larger numbers. The IPL debacle with the ownership is taking a million years to sort out. And those figures I believe are base contract prices. Meaning that much money is guaranteed, plus they get a additional fees each time they represent their country. Also remember only like two or so players get that 400k contract. Like ponting, but he has really shite endorsement deals so it evens out to be the same with other players from other countries.
hitman1980 Posted August 31, 2010 Posted August 31, 2010 This is just for the retainer contract .. it means even if one don't play a single match one is guaranteed to get this much .. The real money comes from match fees and sponsorships .. Since for all the Indian matches board get heavy fee .. this fee is than shared with all the players ..
Zap_Brannigan Posted August 31, 2010 Author Posted August 31, 2010 I do not agree The Indian cricketers wages is already over the average indian wage and indian living standards are much cheaper than those other countries. Plus they receive huge sponsors account. Supply and demand. Simple as that. Will smith gets 100 million dollars while someone like josh brolin makes 1 million dollars per movie because will smiths movies makes 800 million dollars and Brolins movie tanks at the box office. BCCI made something around 300 million $ profits last year and obviously our international players should get according to that and not what an average Indian makes.
IKnowU Posted August 31, 2010 Posted August 31, 2010 BCCI’s Contracts 2009-2010 Posted on 30 November 2009 by mohankaus| 7 Comments BCCI announced the new list of contracted players for 2009-2010. Players from the previous year not included this year have been struck out in the list and players who have been offered new contracts are in bold. Grade A (Rs 60 Lakh): Sachin Tendulkar MS Dhoni Rahul Dravid Zaheer Khan Yuvraj Singh Gautam Gambhir Virender Sehwag VVS Laxman Harbhajan Singh No change since last year… Grade B (Rs 40 Lakh): Suresh Raina Rohit Sharma RP Singh Munaf Patel Ishant Sharma Praveen Kumar (promoted from Grade C) Ashish Nehra (no contract last year) In this grade, S. Badrinath and Irfan Pathan have been “demoted”. Grade C (Rs 25 Lakh): S. Badrinath (demonted from B) Irfan Pathan (demoted from B) Wasim Jaffer Yusuf Pathan Pragyan Ojha Amit Mishra S Sreesanth Dinesh Karthik (promoted from D) In this grade, Piyush Chawla sees a “demotion”. Grade D (Rs 15 lakh): Piyush Chawla (demoted from B), Robin Uthappa Parthiv Patel Cheteshwar Pujara Mohammad Kaif Virat Kohli Ashok Dinda Wriddhiman Saha M Vijay R Ashwin Shikhar Dhawan Sudeep Tyagi Manoj Tiwary Ravindra Jadeja Dhawal Kulkarni Abhishek Nayar Ajinkya Rahane Manpreet Gony and Chetanya Nanda have lost out on a contract while Manoj Tiwary makes a reappearance after being left out in the cold for a year. Meanwhile, players to make the list for the first time are Ravindra Jadeja (about time), Dhawal Kulkarni, Abhishek Nayar and Ajinkya Rahane (3 Mumbai players!). http://i3j3cricket.com/2009/11/30/bccis-contracts-2009-2010/
Temujin Khaghan Posted August 31, 2010 Posted August 31, 2010 what is the per match fee for other countries? our players get more in that i think...
Serani Posted August 31, 2010 Posted August 31, 2010 Mabe because you have so many contracted players, England only have 15 or so I think, also Indians make more from sponsorship and IPL than ther countries so it doesnt matter.
Ram Posted August 31, 2010 Posted August 31, 2010 By Indian standards, Indian cricketers get paid handsomely.
Manny_Pacquiao Posted August 31, 2010 Posted August 31, 2010 cricketers dont earn **** compared to soccer players, basketball players and other major sports stars. tendulkar's fortune won't even come close to say, tiger woods'. 60 lakh a year is what, $150,000? u can earn that working a job here in the US, some ppl on this forum probably do, and they can claim to be bigger earners than the indian cricketers :giggle: when u add endorsement, dhoni and tendulkar are still under 10 crore. so even if that makes them the highest paid cricketers in the world, they are nothing compared to guys in bigger sports SOCCER RICH LIST (earnings in 2009) (Combines salary, bonuses and endorsement income) 1. Lionel Messi(Barcelona) Rs 190.5 cr (29.6-mn£) 2. David Beckham (LA Galaxy/Milan) Rs 177 cr 3. Cristiano Ronaldo (Real Madrid) Rs 175 cr 4. Kaka (Real Madrid) Rs 109 cr 5. Thierry Henry (Barcelona) Rs 104 cr 6. Ronaldinho (AC Milan) Rs 100 cr 7. Carlos Tevez (Manchester City) Rs 88.9 cr 8. Zlatan Ibrahimovic (Barcelona) Rs 84 cr 9. Frank Lampard (Chelsea) Rs 82.9 cr 10. Samuel Eto’o (Inter Milan) Rs 80 cr MOTOR RACING F1 2009 driver salaries 1. Kimi Raikkonen Rs 202.5 crore ($45m) 2. Lewis Hamilton Rs 81 crore 3. Fernando Alonso Rs 67.5 crore 4. Nico Rosberg Rs 38.25 crore 5. Felipe Massa Rs 36 crore 6. Jarno Trulli Rs 29.25 crore 7. Sebastian Vettel Rs 27 crore 8. Mark Webber Rs 24.75 crore 9. Jenson Button Rs 22.5 crore 10. Robert Kubica Rs 20.25 crore NBA 2009 Salaries 1. Tracy McGrady, (now) New York Knicks Rs 104.9 cr ($23.33 mn) 2. Kobe Bryant, Los Angeles Lakers Rs 103. 6 cr 3. Jermaine O’Neal, Miami Heat Rs 103.5 cr 4. Tim Duncan,San Antonio Spurs Rs 100 cr 5. Shaquille O’Neal, Cleveland Cavaliers Rs 90 cr 6. Dirk Nowitzki, Dallas Mavericks Rs 89 cr 7. Paul Pierce, Boston Celtics Rs 89 cr 8. Ray Allen, Boston Celtics Rs 89 cr 9. Rashard Lewis, Orlando Magic Rs 85 cr 10. Michael Redd, Milwaukee Bucks Rs 77 cr http://www.deccanchronicle.com/tabloids/much-ado-about-pittance-840
Tendulkar_Bhai Posted August 31, 2010 Posted August 31, 2010 These figures arent accurate, i remember a few years back the grade A players like Kumble etc were on basic 100k+ which i still remember thinking wasnt enough, but as pointed out they make lots in sponsorship/IPL, so dont worry no one will go hungry tonight.
The Outsider Posted August 31, 2010 Posted August 31, 2010 Besides some of the reasons already mentioned, the A contract players had taken a voluntary cut so that BCCI could contract more in the C and D categories.
CSK Fan Posted August 31, 2010 Posted August 31, 2010 Also, the cost of living in India is still low. 60 lakhs go a long way
putrevus Posted September 1, 2010 Posted September 1, 2010 the question is why are they not paid in accordance to revenue the board is generating, if they are not even paying Indian cricketers equal to what aussies are getting then where is money going. ad revenue and IPL money for players should not be counted , who is pocketing all the money from tv deals.
Jersey #10 Posted September 1, 2010 Posted September 1, 2010 Jadeja makes more than the Paki losers? :yay:
The Outsider Posted September 1, 2010 Posted September 1, 2010 the question is why are they not paid in accordance to revenue the board is generating, if they are not even paying Indian cricketers equal to what aussies are getting then where is money going. ad revenue and IPL money for players should not be counted , who is pocketing all the money from tv deals. They get it through bonuses and match fees. Read the article and it clearly says 26% of BCCI's profit is shared amongst the players, not only current but also past. BCCI might be criticized for a lot of things but over the last few years their treatment of players, both current and retired, has been superb.
Show_stopper Posted September 1, 2010 Posted September 1, 2010 You have to take into consideration the parity in purchasing power of the pound in various countries. The pay is not an issue at all for India/SL and even Pak players. So the reasons given by Lawson recently are no excuse for Pak cricketers to indulge in fixing.
putrevus Posted September 1, 2010 Posted September 1, 2010 They get it through bonuses and match fees. Read the article and it clearly says 26% of BCCI's profit is shared amongst the players' date=' not only current but also past. BCCI might be criticized for a lot of things but over the last few years their treatment of players, both current and retired, has been superb.[/quote'] 26% is too low, players make the sport more popular not the administrators, where is that 74 % of revenue going, look at NFL and other american sports they give more than 50 percent to players and they are privately owned enterprises. BCCI is supposed to be non profit organization where is the rest of 74% going, Yes Players are making lot of money thru commericals or IPL but that is chump change compared to what deals the BCCI getting from tv rights and other sponsorships. These babus of BCCI are skimming off huge amounts to their own pockets which is sad as that money should be diverted to development of future players and building world class facilities, they damn closed MRF which was doing something for future of Indian cricket.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now