Jump to content

Sehwag 2.0


Recommended Posts

Posted

At one time in the 6th or 7th over when Tendulkar too a risky over the top boundary off Rehman, it looked like Sehwag went and calmed Tendulkar down. He was pacing his innings, took a lot of 1s and 2s and slower 100 (in Sehwag's terms). Played 50 overs almost. It's great to have him like this in Tendulkar mode, it's early to call, but he showed signs of it today. Who doesn't like to see Sehwag like this. Sehwag 2.0 or is it because Tendulkar got out early? CI says 'Beware of Sehwag 2.0"! http://www.espncricinfo.com/icc_cricket_worldcup2011/content/current/story/502010.html

Posted

tendulkar's run out was his own fault i thought sehwag worked really hard for his runs. only 14 fours in a huge innings of 175. he usually hits that many in his regular ODI hundreds very strogn running between the wickets today. kohli repeatedly pushed him for doubles and he responded easily. sehwag should always try to play himself in, once he goes past 30-40, he can smash bowlers to pieces.

Posted

Sehwag 2.O is what we need ,not the quick 30-40's Viru,more time he stays at the wicket,more chances of us winning the match So I hope Sehwag 2.0 is here to stay

Posted

Is this the longest he has batted in an ODI innings? Looking at the way he played in the warm ups and today, he does look serious on his resolve to bat longer. Even Sachin or Gambhir havent gone berserk in the PP over. Perhaps the team has decided to play normal cricket (which on these pitches 5 to 5.5 runs an over) till 25-30 overs and launch an assault after that. Looks ominous.

Posted

I think Sachin's run out contributed him taking responsibility. He knew it was his fault, he was watching ball instead of responding to Sachin's call.

Posted
I think Sachin's run out contributed him taking responsibility. He knew it was his fault' date=' he was watching ball instead of responding to Sachin's call.[/quote'] Ok, that's true initially. But Tendulkar should have known that Sehwag was not looking or interested in the run after say, 3 steps. Tendulkar took 7,8 steps and never looked like stopping. That was suicidal. I would blame Tendulkar mostly.
Posted
Ok' date=' that's true initially. But Tendulkar should have known that Sehwag was not looking or interested in the run after say, 3 steps. Tendulkar took 7,8 steps and never looked like stopping. That was suicidal. I would blame Tendulkar mostly.[/quote'] i thought this initially but when a batsman calls for a single then he expects the non striker to respond but Viru never acknowledged Sachin because his back was turned to him.
Posted

I can sacrifice My days work to see Sehwag 2.0 than Sehwag 1.0. If Sehwag 2.0 can play even 75% to his Potential we would regularly end up for 270-280 score.

Posted
Ok' date=' that's true initially. But Tendulkar should have known that Sehwag was not looking or interested in the run after say, 3 steps. Tendulkar took 7,8 steps and never looked like stopping. That was suicidal. I would blame Tendulkar mostly.[/quote'] well you don't know about running between the wicket. It was Tendulkar's call, he was going to danger end. Sometimes you don't even call, jsut run with your partner. Sehwag was guilty of watching the ball. Have you seen Sehwag and Gambhir run. Most of the times its through their eyes. It was bound to happen with Sehwag I guess. He can only improve from here. These things happen all the time in cricket. So no big deal. Good thing is that Sehwag took the responsibility and played a mature knock.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...