urbestfriend Posted May 12, 2011 Posted May 12, 2011 That is not bipasha' date=' the moment she said hello - what is this crap anyways?[/quote'] How are you so sure that her name is not Bipasha?
DomainK Posted May 12, 2011 Posted May 12, 2011 So what if the guy had a tharki talk with an actress? Whats the big deal? No one should have a right to record someone's personal conversation and make it public like this.
ganeshran Posted May 12, 2011 Posted May 12, 2011 He is from UP ... Noida :hahaha: right :P Not Noida He is from Aligarh
ravishingravi Posted May 12, 2011 Author Posted May 12, 2011 So what if the guy had a tharki talk with an actress? Whats the big deal? No one should have a right to record someone's personal conversation and make it public like this. Absolutely
kubrickian Posted May 12, 2011 Posted May 12, 2011 So what if the guy had a tharki talk with an actress? Whats the big deal? No one should have a right to record someone's personal conversation and make it public like this. +1
Stuge Posted May 12, 2011 Posted May 12, 2011 Not Noida He is from Aligarh he to tera UP :P :hehe: Well ,In first place we too talk nonsense on phone with friends ,but that doesn't we would like our conversations to be recorded and made for public .
urbestfriend Posted May 12, 2011 Posted May 12, 2011 hOJuq2ZXsHs So called eminent journalists , Prabhu Chawla and Aroon poorie are also in the payroll of Amar Singh and they dont have any shame in getting abused. Yet these guys are still in top, so much for the credibility of Indian press.
urbestfriend Posted May 12, 2011 Posted May 12, 2011 So what if the guy had a tharki talk with an actress? Whats the big deal? No one should have a right to record someone's personal conversation and make it public like this. To hell with so called ethics, these scaums deserve this and much more. Otherwise how would we know that so called journalists are under payroll of politicians, or why an actress from AP is getting tickets to contest for Loksabha in UP twice? or how so called Eminent lawyers can make a deal with supreme court judges for money, or how so called dalals can strike a deal in one of the biggest scam ? This is scary, everyone including corporates, dalals, bureaucrats , journalists , politicians , film personalities are involved. Wikileaks is nothing compared to these radia,amar tapes.
ganeshran Posted May 12, 2011 Posted May 12, 2011 Radia tapes were far more revealing and showed how the system works behind the scenes. These are mostly personal conversations with a few interesting soundbytes now and then
jusarrived Posted May 12, 2011 Posted May 12, 2011 So what if the guy had a tharki talk with an actress? Whats the big deal? No one should have a right to record someone's personal conversation and make it public like this. + 1 same goes for Bipasha too , its her life ..I dont get why people are obsessed with a celebrities personal lives .
urbestfriend Posted May 12, 2011 Posted May 12, 2011 Radia tapes were far more revealing and showed how the system works behind the scenes. These are mostly personal conversations with a few interesting soundbytes now and then Check youtube, there are 23 tapes of Amar Singh talking to various people. I dont care if he ****s with Jayaprada or Bipasha or whoever but why Indian public have to bear them as MP's just because of their private relationship? Or is it just soundbyte for you if journalists are making deal with scum like Amar singh about what to be printed etc?
Aaku Posted May 12, 2011 Posted May 12, 2011 That doesnt sound like Bips:hmmmm2:but the laugh (cackle) is kinda similar!! :O
ganeshran Posted May 12, 2011 Posted May 12, 2011 Check youtube' date=' there are 23 tapes of Amar Singh talking to various people. I dont care if he ****s with Jayaprada or Bipasha or whoever but why Indian public have to bear them as MP's just because of their private relationship? Or is it just soundbyte for you if journalists are making deal with scum like Amar singh about what to be printed etc?[/quote'] I listened to four or five tapes and it was moslty personal stuff and few offical conversation. The radia tapes were far more comprehensive in the fact that they showed how one individual can collude with so many different influential people (journalists, industrialists, politicians, bureaucrats) and use them as pawns to gain an unfair advantage for her client.
flamy Posted May 12, 2011 Posted May 12, 2011 kya chandugiri is this. I dunno abt this amar singh person. I thot that was daisy_cartman. Bips is highly doable :nice:
WC2011INDIA Posted May 12, 2011 Posted May 12, 2011 :yikes: the female voice in that audio sounds too much like my padosi didi (28). She is hot.
Aaku Posted May 12, 2011 Posted May 12, 2011 :yikes: the female voice in that audio sounds too much like my padosi didi (28). She is hot. noticing padosi aunty !!!!!!!!!!!11111 :whack:
WC2011INDIA Posted May 12, 2011 Posted May 12, 2011 noticing padosi aunty !!!!!!!!!!!11111 :whack: Actually she is only 28....and no I haven't been noticing her. She has invited me to her parties several times so that's how I know her voice.
Rajiv Posted May 12, 2011 Posted May 12, 2011 How are you so sure that her name is not Bipasha? Voice offcourse
Rajiv Posted May 12, 2011 Posted May 12, 2011 Actually she is only 28....and no I haven't been noticing her. She has invited me to her parties several times so that's how I know her voice. I swear I read this a bit differently :icflove:
Recommended Posts