Jump to content

Let's talk about the DRS


champ

Recommended Posts

Posted

Ok I kind of agree that umpire can make blunders and that is why DRS is there..bla bla. But how come Rohit Sharma was given out on No Ball by 3rd umpire is beyond me. Must admit some of the most pathetic umpiring I have seen on a long time.

Posted
Ok I kind of agree that umpire can make blunders and that is why DRS is there..bla bla. But how come Rohit Sharma was given out on No Ball by 3rd umpire is beyond me. Must admit some of the most pathetic umpiring I have seen on a long time.
Happens in Aus every single time. In 77-78, 85,91-92 we were screwed over the maximum. Check reports of those matches.
Posted
Happens in Aus every single time. In 77-78' date=' 85,91-92 we were screwed over the maximum. Check reports of those matches.[/quote'] True. Even Rahane was not out and it was a no ball. Rule says: "On the line belong to the umpires to call it a no ball" For both Rahane and Rohit's dismissal, I could not an inch of Johnson's foot inside the popping crease. Definitely umpiring blunder but of course we cant complain because we don't opt for DRS. Bullcrap. Imagine those 2 wickets overturned, 80 - 100 runs added by those two, would have been a fantastic prospect for Indian victory. These things will never happen in England though. MCC will ban the umpires.
Posted
True. Even Rahane was not out and it was a no ball. Rule says: "On the line belong to the umpires to call it a no ball" For both Rahane and Rohit's dismissal, I could not an inch of Johnson's foot inside the popping crease. Definitely umpiring blunder but of course we cant complain because we don't opt for DRS. Bullcrap. Imagine those 2 wickets overturned, 80 - 100 runs added by those two, would have been a fantastic prospect for Indian victory. These things will never happen in England though. MCC will ban the umpires.
DRS wouldn't gave caught these two because they were already referred to third umpire by the on-field ones. It was the Aussie third umpire that didn't rule it a no-ball. We need to have neutral third umpires especially as they tend to favor the home teams.
Posted
Happens in Aus every single time. In 77-78' date=' 85,91-92 we were screwed over the maximum. Check reports of those matches.[/quote'] These no balls checking has increased because of these umpires blunders.Bowlers bowl no ball many times bt they don't go for checking unless bowler gets wicket.That's why bowler bowl with same leap and steps and bowl the no ball and when he gets wicket,umpire suddenly go for checking.its not fair.If u have watched post match show of 4th day of Brisbane test,many umpire blunders were shown including Jhonson's close no balls which werent given as they were wicketless.:mad:
Posted
These no balls checking has increased because of these umpires blunders.Bowlers bowl no ball many times bt they don't go for checking unless bowler gets wicket.That's why bowler bowl with same leap and steps and bowl the no ball and when he gets wicket' date='umpire suddenly go for checking.its not fair.If u have watched post match show of 4th day of Brisbane test,many umpire blunders were shown including Jhonson's close no balls which werent given as they were wicketless.:mad:[/quote'] Imagine if Amir & Asif's no ball had gone unnoticed by umpires. KLPD for bookies & NOTW :cantstop:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...