rkt.india Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 At the end of the day that should have been the primary objective win or lose. If your franchise could not help develop even a single cricketer shame on them. I sincerely respect Royals on that count. They scout for talent. They used to when they had Darren Berry and Jeremy Snape in their staff during Warne days but not anymore. They have not found any new unknown cricketer in last 2-3 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vvvslaxman Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 They used to when they had Darren Berry and Jeremy Snape in their staff during Warne days but not anymore. They have not found any new unknown cricketer in last 2-3 years. If Rahane were to be with MI, he would probably be sitting in the bench. Just give chance to talent they already have before searching for external talent. In RR's case i think Warne was more proactive. They need a strong captain with vision. Dravid will retire soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crookbond Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 http://www.cricbuzz.com/cricket-news/51090/Wicket-did-more-when-we-batted-Karthik Wicket did more when we batted: Karthik "There was a lot in it initially. The ball was seaming around a lot. It was a little damp. It was a bit like a Test match. It was a question of survival in the first 4-5 overs," said Karthik, who top-scored for the hosts with a well-made 44 in 39 balls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laaloo Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 Once Kohli gets going its gonna be impossible to defend any target against RCB. Its better to chase against their trundlers. MI should try DK as opener. Someone else can come in for Franklin. No. You can't have openers like Sachin/Franklin, Sachin/Karthik at the top. This should be the order IMO. Sachin Smith Sharma Pollard Karthik Raydu Franklin should not be in the team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diga Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 http://www.cricbuzz.com/cricket-news/51090/Wicket-did-more-when-we-batted-Karthik Wicket did more when we batted: Karthik "There was a lot in it initially. The ball was seaming around a lot. It was a little damp. It was a bit like a Test match. It was a question of survival in the first 4-5 overs," said Karthik, who top-scored for the hosts with a well-made 44 in 39 balls. " But Bhajji after losing the toss said he wanted to bat anyway :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crookbond Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 Yea, that was shocking! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
someone Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 The only difference between MI and DC has been luck. If only DC had some luck, they would have had more wins. MI have been tremulously lucky in this tournament with their overall performance being very poor. Everybody should agree with this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bulbul Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 The only difference between MI and DC has been luck. If only DC had some luck, they would have had more wins. MI have been tremulously lucky in this tournament with their overall performance being very poor. Everybody should agree with this. disagree..you wont win solely because of luck..the other side also as bad as you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
someone Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 disagree..you wont win solely because of luck..the other side also as bad as you Nope, you have won from some impossible positions. Some matches which you deservedly should have lost after being outplayed from in the match. While DC have lost matches from which they had total control. DC & MI have no difference if only DC could "buy" some luck......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crookbond Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 By luck if you mean "money" sure! :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diga Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 disagree..you wont win solely because of luck..the other side also as bad as you CSK too won against RCB because of the Kohlis generosity & Vettoris stupidity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asterix Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 Nope, you have won from some impossible positions. Some matches which you deservedly should have lost after being outplayed from in the match. While DC have lost matches from which they had total control. DC & MI have no difference if only DC could "buy" some luck......... Firstly, DDDD is an RCB fan.. He can keep on riling you about MI and you'll end up spewing more venom which he ofcourse wants you to do.. :giggle: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bulbul Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 Firstly' date=' DDDD is an RCB fan.. He can keep on riling you about MI and you'll end up spewing more venom which he ofcourse wants you to do.. :giggle:[/quote'] :idunno: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
someone Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 Firstly' date=' DDDD is an RCB fan.. He can keep on riling you about MI and you'll end up spewing more venom which he ofcourse wants you to do.. :giggle:[/quote'] Lol, these are some simple facts which I guess even you team MI knows that they have been very very lucky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asterix Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 Lol' date=' these are some simple facts which I guess even you team MI knows that they have been very very lucky.[/quote'] If you read my previous posts in this topic, you'll find that I agree with you.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old guy Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 :mi: is next :pw: :secret: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bulbul Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 If you read my previous posts in this topic' date=' you'll find that I agree with you..[/quote'] if he reads even previous posts he will find all of them are anty-jinxes :phehehe: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedFever Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 against KKR , MI have a 7-1 record. The only match MI lost, was when they played a second string side in 2010. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diga Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 against KKR , MI have a 7-1 record. The only match MI lost, was when they played a second string side in 2010. Murphy is watching KKR & MI :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedFever Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 Murphy is watching KKR & MI :) Murphy kon hai bhai Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts