The Narendra Modi thread

[diga]

If all regular posters on CC and politics agree, then I'll put it to other mods for discussion. Just keep in mind that next time you want to criticize the idiotic comments/speeches of Azam Khan or Owaisi that will be subject to the same level of moderation, because apparently criticizing the right wingers is now derogatory.

very well.. lets see how high a bar you can set

[asterix]

^ Calling names could be derogatory... Not criticising...

[ganeshran]

^ Calling names could be derogatory... Not criticising...

Same for pseudo-sickulars, Chaddis, AAPTards, Namorons?

[Detonator]

If all regular posters on CC and politics agree, then I'll put it to other mods for discussion. Just keep in mind that next time you want to criticize the idiotic comments/speeches of Azam Khan or Owaisi that will be subject to the same level of moderation, because apparently criticizing the right wingers is now derogatory to the entire religion

Fail logic. Lame excuse on support of Jihadis. Atleast chaddis don't kill for fun and say "we will kill all muslims" stuff. But jihadis do say, "we will a billion hindus in 15 mins". You don't give same punishment for murder thread and jaywalking.

[asterix]

Same for pseudo-sickulars' date=' Chaddis, AAPTards, Namorons?[/quote'] AAPtards, we've consciously discontinued... Not sure if you are aware on it... People are fine with Namorons...

[FischerTal]

i think these posts also call for better moderation in terms of having moderators who can be here frequently. Its understandable that most mods have a lot of work to do in their personal life, so why not make those people mods who are here most of the time? vvvslaxman and lord come to mind, both rarely get involved in fights, keep a cool head, and would be able to report posts quickly due to their frequent posts.

[ganeshran]

AAPtards' date=' we've consciously discontinued... Not sure if you are aware on it... People are fine with Namorons...[/quote'] pseudo-sickular?

[asterix]

pseudo-sickular?

Not used as frequently as Chaddi is used... TBH I'm fine with all these, even Chaddi's...unless somebody starts countering it with 'half-dicks' or 'katuas'...

[ravishingravi]

The article is bang on target. Chaddis like to act as if India is their baap ki jageer and Muslims have to pay some sort of homage and show gratitude for allowing them to stay on.

This is how mods are. Leading by example. Don't blame the pseudo secular liberals. Struggling to deal with the realities on the ground.

[ganeshran]

Not used as frequently as Chaddi is used... TBH I'm fine with all these' date=' even Chaddi's...unless somebody starts countering it with 'half-dicks' or 'katuas'...[/quote'] half-dicks or katuas is not going to fly. Chaddis, pseudo-sickulars, AAPTards any other such epithets have always been allowed, so not sure that chaddi has become a derogatory term now. Moderation level is quite lenient in ICF and people are not censured for most posts, except direct personal attacks which are obviously not allowed. Any further discussion/problems on moderation will have to go to the admins (Ram, Outy/Sachinism/Tics) or the owner (King) . EDIT: @DM, I will raise the moderation concerns with other mods. Any rule changes will be applied uniformly.

[Detonator]

If I vote for Modi, do I become an anti-jihadi and fatwa bearer?

[Sachin=GOD]

got this from twitter. Don't know how much of this is true.

[Yoda-esque]

Is Paav-wallah OK?

[adi B]

chaddi or jihad can be termed derogatory because they are targeting specific religions (with malevolence) so it should be prohibited but calling pseudo sickular,namrons,aaptards does not target any religion,it just targets the mindsets of certain posters,so its not derogatory. its all fun,relax!!

[FischerTal]

chaddi or jihad can be termed derogatory because they are targeting specific religions (with malevolence) so it should be prohibited but calling pseudo sickular,namrons,aaptards does not target any religion,it just targets the mindsets of certain posters,so its not derogatory. its all fun,relax!!

some people take ICF and life in general too seriously

[Raghav_12]

chaddi or jihad can be termed derogatory because they are targeting specific religions (with malevolence) so it should be prohibited but calling pseudo sickular,namrons,aaptards does not target any religion,it just targets the mindsets of certain posters,so its not derogatory. its all fun,relax!!

I fail to understand how "Chaddi" is specific to any particular religion :hmmmm2:. As far as I know usage of this is equally prevalent across all religions and you can pinpoint any particular religion which can be more associated with this term than others. I am a hindu and I never feel addressed when people are calling "Chaddis" :dontknow:

[Sachin=GOD]

QbZkWT_hoXI Look who the interviewer is :phehehe:

[Detonator]

chaddi or jihad can be termed derogatory because they are targeting specific religions (with malevolence) so it should be prohibited but calling pseudo sickular,namrons,aaptards does not target any religion,it just targets the mindsets of certain posters,so its not derogatory. its all fun,relax!!

jihadi isn't derogatory. Some people are proud of being a jihadi :dontknow:

[Raghav_12]

QbZkWT_hoXI Look who the interviewer is :phehehe:

lol.. and this guy Narendra Modi didn't change much in all these 24 years.

[urbestfriend]

QbZkWT_hoXI Look who the interviewer is :phehehe:

Good one..But definitely not of 1990.