B kumar

[Magneto]

to those saying he can be successful in only helpful conditions.to me thats not a bad thing at all.it means he knows how to exploit these conditions.thats still better than likes of Ishant sucking in helpful conditions n Eng' date='SA,Aus n claiming they r unlucky.its in helpful conditions overseas,that pacers become our strike bowlers n we depend on them.in home,they can be support to spinners.yes,ideally we should have all strike options but I dont think we r spolit for riches to demand that[/quote'] The problem is some people here are pining to see one 6'5 inches tall 150+ bowler bursting out from nowhere who'll be able to swing the ball both ways, bowl yorkers and slowers at will, and castle international sides at less than 100 runs. So there are not pleased with anyone who falls short.

[Old guy]

The problem is some people here are pining to see one 6'5 inches tall 150+ bowler bursting out from nowhere who'll be able to swing the ball both ways, bowl yorkers and slowers at will, and castle international sides at less than 100 runs. So there are not pleased with anyone who falls short.

have ever had bowler like this ? :nervous:

[Lord]

The problem is some people here are pining to see one 6'5 inches tall 150+ bowler bursting out from nowhere who'll be able to swing the ball both ways, bowl yorkers and slowers at will, and castle international sides at less than 100 runs. So there are not pleased with anyone who falls short.

yeah true:giggle:

[panther]

have ever had bowler like this ? :nervous:

Wasim akram was the closest 6'3, 140+k and could do anything with the ball.

[Old guy]

Wasim akram was the closest 6'3' date=' 140+k and could do anything with the ball.[/quote'] never saw him in his prime :((

[Magneto]

Wasim akram was the closest 6'3' date=' 140+k and [b']could do anything with the ball.

Would have respected him more had he not done 'those' things 'with the ball'

[Old guy]

Would have respected him more had he not done 'those' things 'with the ball'

ok which balls are we talking abt now ?

[Vilander]

ok which balls are we talking abt now ?

ones that afridi likes to bite..in the stadium.

[King Tendulkar]

good ball that:cantstop:

[Tiger80]

This guy is a serious business

[Clarke]

Adapted well to their walking down the wicket.

[Trichromatic]

IIRC Joshi ended up with 6 runs in 10 overs, Srinath gave away just 13 runs against NZ in 2002 (or Jan 2003) once - Tuffey gave just 11 runs in that match

[Number]

IIRC Joshi ended up with 6 runs in 10 overs' date=' Srinath gave away just 13 runs against NZ in 2002 (or Jan 2003) once - Tuffey gave just 11 runs in that match[/quote'] In all the games above we won. Here we will lose. :((

[Trichromatic]

In all the games above we won. Here we will lose. :((

Not the one in which Srinath gave 13 runs.

[nsareen]

Bhuvis batting http://youtu.be/MaUv2K9sTfs

[Old guy]

well i think this guy is real deal showed today he can increase pace too def not a 125k tundler

[Lord]

he is real good.not ready for Tests yet,but can be till SA tour

[Old guy]

he is real good.not ready for Tests yet' date='but can be till SA tour[/quote'] i think for south africa and england like conditions he is ready...but i will like to see how other bowlers like shami do before commenting who should be in...also keep in mind pakis are bad against swing other teams will play him much easily same with junaid too hold ur horses padosis dont expect fifer after fifer in south africa :P

[Tendulkar_Bhai]

Just seen the highlights for today and WOW!! He has to be one of the brightest prospects for indian bowling and will only get stronger/faster. But he is still behind the likes of Junaid Khan and Mohammad Irfan..where do the Paks pull these guys out from!?

[Sid]

he is real good.not ready for Tests yet' date='but can be till SA tour[/quote'] If Ishant can play test kirket,then why not Bhuvan B->