Jump to content

Australia Tour of India 2013 |Feb-Mar|


SLICKR392

Australia Tour of India 2013 |Feb-Mar|  

  1. 1.

    • Dhawan
      4
    • Dinda
      3
    • Ojha
      6
    • Rahane
      4


Recommended Posts

Posted

Jaffer hit the ROI attack which had Sreesanth.....ishwar pandey the bowler some say is ready to leapfrog even Shammi and Dinda........and the Mithun. So I think he is definitely better than Vijay by leaps n bound and as good as dhawan.......but his age and his fielding went against him and I respect selectors decision as He is definitely an Average fielder and a weak fielder at international level....... Dhawan is a better fielder than Vijay possibly......

Posted

Harbhajan Singh set to play 100th Test

Harbhajan Singh is all set to become the 10th Indian to play 100 Tests after he was confirmed in the XI for the Chennai Test. The landmark Test will come against Harbhajan's favourite opposition, Australia, and at a venue where 12 years ago he applied the finishing touches to one of the greatest turnarounds in Test history, finishing off as joint Man of the Series against Australia. Harbhajan has taken 408 wickets from 99 Tests at an average of 32.27 and a strike-rate of 68.1. Since India's tour of England in 2011, Harbhajan has mostly been out of the Test side. In the last 20 months or so, he has played just one Test, which India lost to England in Mumbai. "It's a big game," Harbhajan said. "[The previous] 99 are gone. Obviously a bit nervous but I am sure I will be fine. I have faced these situations before. "I have gone through times when I was not doing well or when I was doing well and got too excited. These things happen. Bit nervous to start with, but I will be fine. Once I get away with 100, we will see what needs to be done to play another 50-odd. Probably I will have to work even harder."
http://www.espncricinfo.com/india/content/current/story/605773.html
Posted

probably is shuraim i guess the key question is, will india play 3 spinners? it means that Rahane will come in at 6 than Jadeja

Posted
probably is shuraim i guess the key question is, will india play 3 spinners? it means that Rahane will come in at 6 than Jadeja
Yeah, that will likely be the combination. Ashwin, Ojha, Bhajji and one of Ishant or BK with Rahane at 6.
Posted
probably is shuraim i guess the key question is, will india play 3 spinners? it means that Rahane will come in at 6 than Jadeja
thanks,i think abate rayudu would have been good at no.6 like vvs a free flowing stroke maker.?
Posted

Ishant will play IMO I have never liked the philosophy of 3 spinners. Both Ashwin and bhajji are right are off spinners. Ojha is a left armer. I can somewhat understand if Chawla is played as he is a leg spinner. In a test match Bhajji and Ojha can bowl about 50 overs between them leaving Kumar/Dinda and Ishant to bowl 20 overs each. There is no point playing two similar bowlers in bhajji and ashwin. (the carom ball has lost its element of surprise)

Posted
thanks' date='i think abate rayudu would have been good at no.6 like vvs a free flowing stroke maker.?[/quote'] i sort of agree there as well. Rahane has never really batted with the tail and is more of a grafter who bats in the top order. We tried Pujara at 6 and it did not work out and he did not know how to bat with the tail.
Posted
average 32 .strike rate 68 ' date='no offense but i think he is the first to 100th test with those numbers among bowlers?[/quote'] Average below 30 against the two biggest teams of his time SA and Aus. No offense to Kumble but is he a bit of a minnow bully? (Above 30 for both) :giggle: Anyway grats to Harbhajan, big game player. Unlike many other high wicket taking spinners a few batsmen in his highest dismissed list were top class not average/lower order batsmen. A world class bowler although a bit inconsistent against chit teams. On his day Bhaji can get anyone out. And against Australia at home he has a fantastic record. Deserves his spot after recent few FC matches too, we all know he has ability, just needed to show some form.
Posted
Average below 30 against the two biggest teams of his time SA and Aus. No offense to Kumble but is he a bit of a minnow bully? (Above 30 for both) :giggle: Anyway grats to Harbhajan, big game player. Unlike many other high wicket taking spinners a few batsmen in his highest dismissed list were top class not average/lower order batsmen. A world class bowler although a bit inconsistent against chit teams. On his day Bhaji can get anyone out. And against Australia at home he has a fantastic record. Deserves his spot after recent few FC matches too, we all know he has ability, just needed to show some form.
thats cause kumble has played more matches against SA and Aus away from home for eg Kumble has played 10 test matches in australia averaging 37 with the ball. Bhajji has played 4 matches in Australia averaging 72 with the ball. If bhajji does tour australia with India he will averge more than kumble v australia. Plus hardly a minnow basher. Kumble has an overall average of 30.5 v Aus and Bhajji has an overall average of 29.5 v Aus and what about England home and away? :--D If you take SA Aus and England together Kumble averages less than bhajji with the ball.
Posted

also like to point out that Kumble has played the majority of his test matches away from India (63 home and 69 away) bhajji has played the majority of his matches in India (53 home 46 away) Kumble averages less than Bhajji home and away http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/player/30176.html?class=1;template=results;type=bowling http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/player/29264.html?class=1;template=results;type=bowling the only reason why bhajji has a lower (fractionally lower mind you) average v SA and Aus overall is because he has not played them away enough compared to playing them at home. Bhajji averages more with the ball than Kumble home and away v these sides but his % of away matches with a higher bowler average is less, hence a higher % of home matches allows Bhajji to appear to have a lower average

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...