Texy Posted May 23, 2013 Posted May 23, 2013 Reminds me of the Marad Massacre - 2002 in Kerala where 8 Hindus were hacked to death by the local Muslim group and then they escaped to the local mosque. London has become a giant swath of ghettos made up by trash from every sh1thole on earth. Similar attacks have already happened in the Netherlands, Sweden and slowly spreading all over Europe thanks to their lax refugee & immigration program. The jihad is on. One of the captured jihadi is of British born, Nigerian descent who recently converted to Islam.
FischerTal Posted May 23, 2013 Author Posted May 23, 2013 Reminds me of the Marad Massacre - 2002 in Kerala where 8 Hindus were hacked to death by the local Muslim group and then they escaped to the local mosque. London has become a giant swath of ghettos made up by trash from every sh1thole on earth. Similar attacks have already happened in the Netherlands, Sweden and slowly spreading all over Europe thanks to their lax refugee & immigration program. The jihad is on. One of the captured jihadi is of British born, Nigerian descent who recently converted to Islam. but but what will happen to diversity and multiculturalism.....
Texy Posted May 23, 2013 Posted May 23, 2013 A muslim man (whilst igonoring he is black and off Nigerian descent) commits murder is labelled "terrorist" straight away. A white neo-nazi man slaughters over 40 school kids is labelled a lone "psychopath". Whether he's a terrorist or a 'jihadi'...what difference does that make? They are using Islam as justification to murder and mayhem ALL OVER THE FECKING WORLD.....few gets caught after the act but several gets caught before. Muslims have the tendency to blame others for their problem while completely ignoring their own actions. The Canadian would be terrorist was a PhD candidate FFS!!!! but but what will happen to diversity and multiculturalism..... If this continues...London in a 100 yrs will probably become the 1st Sharia ruled European city.
FischerTal Posted May 23, 2013 Author Posted May 23, 2013 Whether he's a terrorist or a 'jihadi'...what difference does that make? They are using Islam as justification to murder and mayhem ALL OVER THE FECKING WORLD.....few gets caught after the act but several gets caught before. Muslims have the tendency to blame others for their problem while completely ignoring their own actions. The Canadian would be terrorist was a PhD candidate FFS!!!! If this continues...London in a 100 yrs will probably become the 1st Sharia ruled European city. :agree: it already is
jiggo Posted May 23, 2013 Posted May 23, 2013 Whether he's a terrorist or a 'jihadi'...what difference does that make? They are using Islam as justification to murder and mayhem ALL OVER THE FECKING WORLD.....few gets caught after the act but several gets caught before. Muslims have the tendency to blame others for their problem while completely ignoring their own actions. The Canadian would be terrorist was a PhD candidate FFS!!!! If this continues...London in a 100 yrs will probably become the 1st Sharia ruled European city. It makes a difference because the labelling of any such attacks by non-whites is immediately classed as terrorist attacks, impacting not only muslims but for eg Indian Hindus, Sikhs, Christians, Jains etc too. Whilst white terrorists are classed only as "psychopaths" even when there justifications in underpinned by neo-Nazi and extreme right wing lunacy idealogies. This reminds me of last year, when the UK police busted Paki gangs in the UK hunting and raping little white girls, but media dubbed it as an "Asian" problem hence putting every brown person under the sun in the UK associated to the Paki community.
punjabi_khota Posted May 23, 2013 Posted May 23, 2013 It makes a difference because the labelling of any such attacks by non-whites is immediately classed as terrorist attacks, impacting not only muslims but for eg Indian Hindus, Sikhs, Christians, Jains etc too. Whilst white terrorists are classed only as "psychopaths" even when there justifications in underpinned by neo-Nazi and extreme right wing lunacy idealogies. This reminds me of last year, when the UK police busted Paki gangs in the UK hunting and raping little white girls, but media dubbed it as an "Asian" problem hence putting every brown person under the sun in the UK associated to the Paki community. Did you follow the Boston Marathon bombings ? Those perpetrators are as white as they come, and they are called terrorists. The connection is Islam, not the color of the skin. With this latest London attack, now we have got brown, white AND Black jehadis. If one of the chinese jihadi from the Xinjiang makes it to west and blows something up, we will have all colors covered.
Swing_n_Speed Posted May 23, 2013 Posted May 23, 2013 Not much different in Sweden either, 3fpjmkdMdbA 2zAApPiYfK4
Ranvir Posted May 23, 2013 Posted May 23, 2013 Not much different in Sweden either, 3fpjmkdMdbA 2zAApPiYfK4 We had similar riots in England in Oldham in 2001, done by the Pakistanis and Bangladeshis. Likewise, North African Arabs are causing problems in France and Turks in Germany. They are backward communities who don't put enough emphasis on education and they lack respect for their host country. Indians (Hindus and Sikhs) in the west generally don't demonstrate this kind of behavior. They are amongst the richest people in the UK and USA and achieve higher than average grades. So these Arabs, Pakistanis and Bangladeshis cannot use discrimination as an excuse because if Indians can be successful so can they but Islam puts them at a severe disadvantage.
Laaloo Posted May 23, 2013 Posted May 23, 2013 If this continues...London in a 100 yrs will probably become the 1st Sharia ruled European city. Don't think it will take a 100 years. Try about 50. Maybe in our lifetime we will see this
Ranvir Posted May 23, 2013 Posted May 23, 2013 Don't think it will take a 100 years. Try about 50. Maybe in our lifetime we will see this I think there are more Indians than Pakistanis and Bangladeshis in London. West and North West london have a huge amount of Indian Punjabis and Gujaratis
panther Posted May 23, 2013 Posted May 23, 2013 Nope Marseille has the best chance 33% of people in Marseille are muslim.
jiggo Posted May 23, 2013 Posted May 23, 2013 Did you follow the Boston Marathon bombings ? Those perpetrators are as white as they come, and they are called terrorists. The connection is Islam, not the color of the skin. With this latest London attack, now we have got brown, white AND Black jehadis. If one of the chinese jihadi from the Xinjiang makes it to west and blows something up, we will have all colors covered. it's not as simple as skin colour, their names and ethnic origins hardly pointed to someone from a white western nation. How come none of the nutjob white Americans who go on a shooting spree ever get labelled a terrorist? but conveniently get called a loner, a psychopath, emotionally unstable..same goes for that Norwegian terrorist, andres breviek. There is a clear hypocrisy and (obvious fear factor) from western media outlets.
Ranvir Posted May 23, 2013 Posted May 23, 2013 multiculturalism zindabad. To be fair it's the muslims, blacks and gypsies who make multiculturalism fail.
punjabiplaya Posted May 23, 2013 Posted May 23, 2013 it's not as simple as skin colour, their names and ethnic origins hardly pointed to someone from a white western nation. How come none of the nutjob white Americans who go on a shooting spree ever get labelled a terrorist? but conveniently get called a loner, a psychopath, emotionally unstable..same goes for that Norwegian terrorist, andres breviek. There is a clear hypocrisy and (obvious fear factor) from western media outlets. so what your saying all these THOUSANDS of attacks happening regularly by people of the muslim religion the reporting should be just as nutters??? he was cutting and chopping the guys head off screaming alla hu akbar....saying its the will of allah!!!!! excuse me jiggo..you have the right to say your piece but please dont be biased and it seems like most muslims do(my muslim friend abs tells me..)use others mistakes to justify there own,i can understand if were a few attacks but there are thousands of terrorist attacks a year all over the world in the name of islam!!!! your saying a few?? how can so many people be nutters??? jiggo look at the facts..soon as something happens bad...im saying this as a gora would...a terrorist attack..... peadophile gang...drug gangs....frauds...the first thing they say i bet its muslims or pakis!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And 95 out of 100 it is!! its become normal....thats not hypocrisy..its fact!! dont blame western media outlets ..look in your own house ok??? i think thats why its another muslim terrorist another muslim grooming gang etc etc..... just because other people shoot and kill on shooting sprees there not running round saying ganesh be with me as i kill these goras or buddah guide my bulletts into these satanists???????? you see they arent using a religious agenda like all these fanatics are!! if hindus were killing in every country then yes you have a point,but when nearly all terrorist attacks are done by muslims worlwide you have to start looking in house rather than blaming others!!
jiggo Posted May 23, 2013 Posted May 23, 2013 so what your saying all these THOUSANDS of attacks happening regularly by people of the muslim religion the reporting should be just as nutters??? he was cutting and chopping the guys head off screaming alla hu akbar....saying its the will of allah!!!!! excuse me jiggo..you have the right to say your piece but please dont be biased and it seems like most muslims do(my muslim friend abs tells me..)use others mistakes to justify there own,i can understand if were a few attacks but there are thousands of terrorist attacks a year all over the world in the name of islam!!!! your saying a few?? how can so many people be nutters??? jiggo look at the facts..soon as something happens bad...im saying this as a gora would...a terrorist attack..... peadophile gang...drug gangs....frauds...the first thing they say i bet its muslims or pakis!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And 95 out of 100 it is!! its become normal....thats not hypocrisy..its fact!! dont blame western media outlets ..look in your own house ok??? i think thats why its another muslim terrorist another muslim grooming gang etc etc..... just because other people shoot and kill on shooting sprees there not running round saying ganesh be with me as i kill these goras or buddah guide my bulletts into these satanists???????? you see they arent using a religious agenda like all these fanatics are!! if hindus were killing in every country then yes you have a point,but when nearly all terrorist attacks are done by muslims worlwide you have to start looking in house rather than blaming others!! I simply ask all terrorists be called terrorists. There is tendency in the western media when a white guy goes on a killing spree he is labelled everything except a terrorist. As soon it's clear the culprit is not white, everyone from the media to politicians can't wait to jump on the "terrorist" labelling bandwagon.
punjabiplaya Posted May 23, 2013 Posted May 23, 2013 I simply ask all terrorists be called terrorists. There is tendency in the western media when a white guy goes on a killing spree he is labelled everything except a terrorist. As soon it's clear the culprit is not white, everyone from the media to politicians can't wait to jump on the "terrorist" labelling bandwagon. jiggo i tottally agree with you my friend.... All terrorists should be called terrorists...unfortunatly 99.9percent are muslims... i dont mean to offend you but its fact..if theres a bombing you dont go i bet its those buddists!!!!!!!! But these idiots on killing sprees they dont have a religious motive..there may be a handful im not denying that jiggo...but if you read your statements, Its flawed and a typical muslim response..you seem intelligent and i think if you have any arguement always look on both sides of the coin,its hard if your a muslim i agree,but you have too!!! I request you please dont try to jusify these extremists or try to say if white people commit crimes why dont you crucify them??? listen you will get a lot more respect by just admiting you guys have a serious problem,dont blame the americans,dont blame the brits,just look at yourself!!!!!If your that concerned then why wasnt there outcrying, demonstrating,condemnation when saddam was killing 100s thousands of kurds ??? Theres killings on muslims on muslims every day..shias killing sunnis n vice versa!!!!but funnily enough theres a deafening silence there..... excuses excuses it makes everyone sick and people have no respect for you! you can delude yourself what im saying isnt true but IT IS!!! The sad thing is when you have a genuine issue and reason for complaint no one will listen!!! FACT!!!!!!!!!!!
superstar Posted May 24, 2013 Posted May 24, 2013 Anjem Choudry, the former leader of banned Islamic group al-Muhijaroun, has appeared on BBC Newsnight where he refused to say that he abhorred the attack in Woolwich. He said: He [Michael Adebolajo] was someone who came to our demonstrations, he attended some of the lectures. I think the last time I saw him was about two or three years ago. ...What he said explains what he did. When I saw what took place I was shocked. One man killed in the street does not equate to the hundreds and thousands and millions, in fact, who have been slaughtered by the British and Americans in their foreign policy. If we're going to start abhorring, where's the condemnation for the British foreign policy? I believe that that action, for me, would not be allowed. But I do believe there's a difference of opinion. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/may/23/woolwich-latest-developments-live Dude seems to have forgotten that he is British as well.
ganeshran Posted May 24, 2013 Posted May 24, 2013 We had similar riots in England in Oldham in 2001, done by the Pakistanis and Bangladeshis. Likewise, North African Arabs are causing problems in France and Turks in Germany. They are backward communities who don't put enough emphasis on education and they lack respect for their host country. Indians (Hindus and Sikhs) in the west generally don't demonstrate this kind of behavior. They are amongst the richest people in the UK and USA and achieve higher than average grades. So these Arabs, Pakistanis and Bangladeshis cannot use discrimination as an excuse because if Indians can be successful so can they but Islam puts them at a severe disadvantage. That is because the Indians who emigrated to Britain are from a different socio economic class compared to pakistanis and bangladeshis. Add to that, generations of dogmatic religious thinking and the result is the current state. There is no magic line on the border that makes us intrinsically better than Pakis.
ganeshran Posted May 24, 2013 Posted May 24, 2013 I simply ask all terrorists be called terrorists. There is tendency in the western media when a white guy goes on a killing spree he is labelled everything except a terrorist. As soon it's clear the culprit is not white, everyone from the media to politicians can't wait to jump on the "terrorist" labelling bandwagon. Except Breivik, who did commit his crimes in the name of Christianity and should have been labelled a terrorist, I don't see why lone wolf shooters should be called religious fundamentalists. Adam Lanza and the Virginia tech shooters displayed no signs of religiosity, just psychological illness The current attack is however by a man claiming to be doing so in the name of Islam and there is nothing wrong with identifying it as such.
Recommended Posts