SLICKR392 Posted July 1, 2013 Posted July 1, 2013 You'd be nuts to play 6 bowlers. Vinay or Mishra would do better than Vijay.
JaFanatic Posted July 1, 2013 Posted July 1, 2013 Yea atleast one or two like Mandeep' date=' Chand.. i know they are yet to evolve.. Sometimes throwing them in the deep end might work.[/quote'] its better to give a wk batsman like saha or smit patel they both can do better than mandeep and chand in the batting department atm if you want to try only a batsman then there are much better batters like pujara, jaggi and jadhav
vvvslaxman Posted July 1, 2013 Posted July 1, 2013 its better to give a wk batsman like saha or smit patel they both can do better than mandeep and chand in the batting department atm if you want to try only a batsman then there are much better batters like pujara' date=' jaggi and jadhav[/quote'] I am talking about under - 25. I don't think Smit patel has done anything in India A tour or domestic cricket. Pujara could have been there in place of Vijay. Ashwin has a ready made replacement there in the form of Mishra.
JaFanatic Posted July 1, 2013 Posted July 1, 2013 I am talking about under - 25. I don't think Smit patel has done anything in India A tour or domestic cricket. Pujara could have been there in place of Vijay. Ashwin has a ready made replacement there in the form of Mishra. smit patel is yet to do anything spectacular but has been decent and consistent so far but i think its always safe to have two wk-batsmen in the squad
Austin 3:!6 Posted July 1, 2013 Posted July 1, 2013 Let Vijay replace Dhoni and open with Dhawan Rohit at 4 Shammi should replace Sharma. As far as MSD...even if he gets fit..let him take rest for this series and Zibmabwe tour (which he will take anyway). However I feel Dhoni is one of those players who dont believe in taking rests as he thinks only playing continuously can him to maintain form.
Clarke Posted July 1, 2013 Posted July 1, 2013 Vinay or Mishra would do better than Vijay. Batting will be extremely thin without MSD. We have to cover all bases, not look at just one aspect (bowling).
Lord Posted July 1, 2013 Posted July 1, 2013 Batting will be extremely thin without MSD. We have to cover all bases' date=' not look at just one aspect (bowling).[/quote'] Mooli wont strengthen it anyway
Clarke Posted July 1, 2013 Posted July 1, 2013 Mooli wont strengthen it anyway Rayudu certainly will on paper. Besides, you guys are being bonkers in advocating 6 bowlers. Please, get some perspective, its not like we have an ATG batting line up with or without MSD.
Lord Posted July 1, 2013 Posted July 1, 2013 Rayudu certainly will on paper. Besides, you guys are being bonkers in advocating 6 bowlers. Please, get some perspective, its not like we have an ATG batting line up with or without MSD. Rayudu wont be there for tomorrow's match our batting is thin now,makes sense to strengthen bowling now to cover it up.We can then defend low scores hopefuly
vvvslaxman Posted July 1, 2013 Posted July 1, 2013 Dhoni = WK + stabilizer + Finisher + captain ... hard to replace this guy :hatsoff:
King Tendulkar Posted July 1, 2013 Posted July 1, 2013 Rayudu certainly will on paper. Besides, you guys are being bonkers in advocating 6 bowlers. Please, get some perspective, its not like we have an ATG batting line up with or without MSD. 6 bowlers is just insane:hysterical: Is this what ICF think tank is coming up with:hysterical:
SLICKR392 Posted July 1, 2013 Posted July 1, 2013 The equation now is much simpler with Rayudu's inclusion.
Lord Posted July 1, 2013 Posted July 1, 2013 6 bowlers is just insane:hysterical: Is this what ICF think tank is coming up with:hysterical: if only other option is Mooli,it doesnt look a bad idea to me. we should really have had more backups.1 is too less
JaFanatic Posted July 1, 2013 Posted July 1, 2013 6 bowlers is just insane:hysterical: Is this what ICF think tank is coming up with:hysterical: and we were criticising the selectors like we're any better :P
SLICKR392 Posted July 1, 2013 Posted July 1, 2013 if only other option is Mooli' date=it doesnt look a bad idea to me. we should really have had more backups.1 is too less I would have had a Vinay or Mishra who could bat at the tail ahead of Vijay. Rayudu was a good pick. :nice:
Lord Posted July 1, 2013 Posted July 1, 2013 I would have had a Vinay or Mishra who could bat at the tail ahead of Vijay. Rayudu was a good pick. :nice: Rayudu wont play next 2 matches for sure.he'd reach there by 3rd.so its either Mooli or Mishra/Vinay.I'd go for Mishra
Clarke Posted July 1, 2013 Posted July 1, 2013 6 bowlers is just insane:hysterical: Is this what ICF think tank is coming up with:hysterical: Next up: Since Raina hasn't been successful with the bat on tours, lets play both Vinay & Mishra ahead of him and the useless Vijay. So what if we're having 7 bowlers, we can defend targets! BTW Ashwin/Bhuvi/Sir can bat. There you go, a winning combination.
SLICKR392 Posted July 1, 2013 Posted July 1, 2013 Next up: Since Raina hasn't been successful with the bat on tours' date=' lets play both Vinay & Mishra ahead of him and the useless Vijay. So what if we're having 7 bowlers, we can defend targets! BTW Ashwin/Bhuvi/Sir can bat. There you go, a winning combination.[/quote'] He scored 44 in the last game. :hmmmm2: Vijay is clueless in ODIs.
Clarke Posted July 1, 2013 Posted July 1, 2013 He scored 44 in the last game. :hmmmm2: Vijay is clueless in ODIs. I'm exaggerating on the idea of playing six bowlers. There's something called team balance after all.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now