Rohit vs Akmal vs Darren vs Kane vs Chandi vs Nasir

[Austin 3:!6]

Tailunt strikes again...take that :mummydance:

[cricketman]

I'd pick Williamson and Chandimal over Rohit.

[Sajid_Rana]

Umar is far better batsman than any of players mentioned in title. He has established himself outside home conditions and have played some good test innings in Aus and NZ.

[Hafeez]

Umar is far better batsman than any of players mentioned in title. He has established himself outside home conditions and have played some good test innings in Aus and NZ.

+1 Umar akmal is also WK/Batsman now Days like Sang,Dhoni,Ab

[vvvslaxman]

I'd pick Williamson and Chandimal over Rohit.

Williamson probably has better defense

[Austin 3:!6]

Umar is far better batsman than any of players mentioned in title. He has established himself outside home conditions and have played some good test innings in Aus and NZ.

Then why he is out of test side?

[rkt.india]

Akmal hands down.

[Austin 3:!6]

Umar Akmal is a hack...stop rating him as a proper batsman Thanks

[adi B]

williamson is the best test (the real format) batsmen of the lot akmal in odis

[Austin 3:!6]

No its Rohit Sharma

[1983-2011]

Umar Akmal is a hack...stop rating him as a proper batsman Thanks

averages 38.85 with SR of 85.73 in ODIs compared to rohit's 32.37 with SR of 75.61

[Austin 3:!6]

averages 38.85 with SR of 85.73 in ODIs compared to rohit's 32.37 with SR of 75.61

When you bat down the order..few not out's can boost your avg, nothing special. Umar does not have same amount of talent as Rohit, however he started showing improvement in the recent WI series.

[Lord]

When you bat down the order..few not out's can boost your avg, nothing special. Umar does not have same amount of talent as Rohit, however he started showing improvement in the recent WI series.

his absolute avg(ignoring not outs) is still better than Nohit Nohit can have all the talent he wants,I'll prefer the one scoring runs

[vvvslaxman]

his absolute avg(ignoring not outs) is still better than Nohit Nohit can have all the talent he wants,I'll prefer the one scoring runs

Both are mediocre. Umar is a good T20 slogger. In recent ODIs in Windies he had such T20 scenarios. He thrived against bowling of Pollard, Bravo. Probably better player than guys like Hafeez. But overall he is still the same i saw before he was dropped.

[putrevus]

Nasir from BD is very underrated, he is very good player unlike other hacks in his team.

[Austin 3:!6]

his absolute avg(ignoring not outs) is still better than Nohit Nohit can have all the talent he wants,I'll prefer the one scoring runs

:finger: Umar's avg excluding not out's is: 30.16

[1983-2011]

:finger: Umar's avg excluding not out's is: 30.16

thats because he doesnt get out as much like tailunt rohit:giggle:

[Lord]

:finger: Umar's avg excluding not out's is: 30.16

its 32.4 :poink:

[Hafeez]

When you bat down the order..few not out's can boost your avg, nothing special. Umar does not have same amount of talent as Rohit, however he started showing improvement in the recent WI series.

compare Umar akmal Stats with Indian No-6 Raina :finger: Better Stats than Raina good On short ball unlike Raina :finger: Not played 1 match in Pakistan where Raian scored most of his runs in India :finger: To be honest Umar akmal>Rohit,Raina

[rahulrulezz]

Akmal is probably the most impactful player from the current crop. In my current world 11 squad, Akmal wud easily get a spot. Rohit, I will not even put him for 'drinks carrying 11' squad