MCcricket Posted October 25, 2013 Posted October 25, 2013 After the game in Ranchi when Haydos, Alan, Ganguly were discussing the game he said how much he liked Shami and its time the selectors take notice and rather picking up medium pacers need to develop and select 140 k pace pool of potential bowlers because that is what is required to have a successfully bowling attack in int cricket, he talked about Shukla,Umesh, also talked how useless our medium pace attack has looked in the series and how you could never have a attacking game with limited bowlers, a 125 to 130 bowler has only one option to pitch it up and seam and hope for a mistake. A 140 bowler can cause batsmen to make errors in judgement, bowl short to the body and screw up batters footwork, and win a game on his own, he said Indian selectors and coaches need to realize and develop right bowlers rather setting themselves for failures and keep on picking up bowlers on medium pace
Cricketics Posted October 25, 2013 Posted October 25, 2013 I personally consider the 2002 Natwest Final most hyped much much of last decade, but Ganguly's bold captaincy got the bright change Indian team needed. Inserting youngsters like Sehwag, Yuvraj, Kaif, Zaheer and having confidence in them was a big thing for Indian Cricket. Barring, Kaif, most of these players went on to be pretty Vital players for our country. He instilled this never say die attitude among Indian cricket players and a never lose hope attitude among us fans. How much ever the Bengali Jaghmohan Dalmiya corrupt was and taking the side of Ganguly to be the captain, it was the best thing to happen for Indian Cricket. In numbers, Dhoni will go on to become the greatest Indian captain. He already has but Ganguly changed the way India started looking to cricket.
MCcricket Posted October 25, 2013 Author Posted October 25, 2013 I personally consider the 2002 Natwest Final most hyped much much of last decade, but Ganguly's bold captaincy got the bright change Indian team needed. Inserting youngsters like Sehwag, Yuvraj, Kaif, Zaheer and having confidence in them was a big thing for Indian Cricket. Barring, Kaif, most of these players went on to be pretty Vital players for our country. He instilled this never say die attitude among Indian cricket players and a never lose hope attitude among us fans. How much ever the Bengali Jaghmohan Dalmiya corrupt was and taking the side of Ganguly to be the captain, it was the best thing to happen for Indian Cricket. In numbers, Dhoni will go on to become the greatest Indian captain. He already has but Ganguly changed the way India started looking to cricket. I agree and Ganguly was a visionary and moulded his team whereas Dhoni is useless in terms of grooming and selecting , spotting potential talent, he is not sophisticated smart or wants to do anything about the teams weakness
Temujin Khaghan Posted October 25, 2013 Posted October 25, 2013 Ganguly - leadership, heroism, commanded respect and love from players/fans, emotional, aggressive, couldn't hold his nerve in tense situations Dhoni - administration, keeping the players in control, Born Ruler, no one can challenge his place, practical, realistic, defensive, coolest captain ever Kapil - expected everyone to reach his genius, insensitive (dealing with young srinath), emotional, hardworking, led by example Pataudi - Hero, unafraid, royal, better batsman than Rohit Sharma even with a single eye, Sophisticated, Rare Royal Prince who was friendly with players of even middle class backgrounds during that era Sachin - Napoleon of cricket, knew every strategy, genius of the highest order, an equal to Shane warne in the understanding of game of cricket, bad team, greatest weakness - tried to micromanage instead of giving the players some space Kumble - Great man, Great character, aloof, gentleman, hardworking, beat well above his weight, heroism was on display when he broke his jaw and yet played a few overs Dravid - herbivore, gentleman, great workethics, tried to inculcate australian values in india team and failed. he wasn't man enough to stand up to other greats in the dressing room. He gave up very easily
vamos_rafa Posted October 25, 2013 Posted October 25, 2013 Pataudi - Hero, unafraid, royal, better batsman than Rohit Sharma even with a single eye, :hysterical:
Zanjeer Posted October 25, 2013 Posted October 25, 2013 After the game in Ranchi when Haydos, Alan, Ganguly were discussing the game he said how much he liked Shami and its time the selectors take notice and rather picking up medium pacers need to develop and select 140 k pace pool of potential bowlers because that is what is required to have a successfully bowling attack in int cricket, he talked about Shukla,Umesh, also talked how useless our medium pace attack has looked in the series and how you could never have a attacking game with limited bowlers, a 125 to 130 bowler has only one option to pitch it up and seam and hope for a mistake. A 140 bowler can cause batsmen to make errors in judgement, bowl short to the body and screw up batters footwork, and win a game on his own, he said Indian selectors and coaches need to realize and develop right bowlers rather setting themselves for failures and keep on picking up bowlers on medium pace Absolutely spot on. Ganguly never supported trundlers.
saneindian Posted October 25, 2013 Posted October 25, 2013 Tinu Yohanan, Amit Bhandari, Avishkar Salvi, Joginder Sharma, Iqbal Siddiqui, JP Yadav, RP Singh (who used to bowl 125 at that time), Sanjay Bangar, Reetinder Sodhi What is common to the above list? Most of them 'maha trundlers', many of them 'malnourished & pathetic' besides having made their debut under Dada. Might as well add the likes of SS Das and Kaif who looked equally 'malnourished'. Had ICF been around, god knows the kind of abuses Ganguly would have got for picking these type of players.
Soorma_Bhopali Posted October 25, 2013 Posted October 25, 2013 Absolutely spot on. Ganguly never supported trundlers. I agree on Ganguly's leadership skills .. However ,I have seen him support Ashok Dinda also vociferously saying that he is workhorse and anytime as a Bengal captain he asked him , he was always ready to bowl his heart out ..He praised his work ethic ..Do you think his evaluation is justfied ?
Zanjeer Posted October 25, 2013 Posted October 25, 2013 Tinu Yohanan, Amit Bhandari, Avishkar Salvi, Joginder Sharma, Iqbal Siddiqui, JP Yadav, RP Singh (who used to bowl 125 at that time), Sanjay Bangar, Reetinder Sodhi What is common to the above list? Most of them 'maha trundlers', many of them 'malnourished & pathetic' besides having made their debut under Dada. Might as well add the likes of SS Das and Kaif who looked equally 'malnourished'. Had ICF been around, god knows the kind of abuses Ganguly would have got for picking these type of players. In According to a report in Mid-Day newspaper, India's cricket captain Sourav Ganguly is angry that the selectors did not consult him before picking the team for the first Test against England. ``They (selectors) did not bother to ask me for my suggestions, nobody called me,'' the newspaper quoted Ganguly as saying. Ganguly, who was away on the South African tour when the selectors named the 14-man squad on Wednesday, said he had expected a phone call from chairman Chandu Borde. ``Couldn't they call me for two minutes? Is it a new rule that the captain will not be asked for his opinion? I'll try to confirm this from the president Jagmohan Dalmiya'', he told the paper. ``Now I understand why Sachin resigned,'' Ganguly said, referring to master batsman Sachin Tendulkar's refusal to lead India two seasons ago amidst reports of a spat with the selectors. In an unexpected move, the selectors omitted the entire five-man pace attack that went to South Africa, for the Mohali Test scheduled to start on Monday. Borde said that except pace spearhead Javagal Srinath, who bowled well in South Africa before being injured, the rest of the attack had disappointed him. In their place, the selectors picked three rookie bowlers, Sanjay Bangar, Iqbal Siddiqui and Tinnu Youhannan. �I know our pacemen have not bowled well in South Africa,'' Ganguly said. ``But are the chosen ones better than Ajit Agarkar, Aashish Nehra and Zaheer Khan? ``We needed a left-armer to create some roughs on the wicket so that the off-spinners could turn the ball more. ``But now we don't have that option,'' Ganguly said, adding that he had only watched Siddiqui in action. http://www.indiaexpress.com/news/sports/cricket/20011201-0.html here we go. Dada was never a supporter of trundlers. I can't give a better example than this.
Zanjeer Posted October 25, 2013 Posted October 25, 2013 I agree on Ganguly's leadership skills .. However ,I have seen him support Ashok Dinda also vociferously saying that he is workhorse and anytime as a Bengal captain he asked him , he was always ready to bowl his heart out ..He praised his work ethic ..Do you think his evaluation is justfied ? if you remember dinda during Zimbabwe tour in 2009-10, he was bowling 140-145s . Fast bowlers have a short life. As they get older they would slow down. Ganguly may have had a soft corner for dinda but he was quick to criticize him when he bowled rubbish against England in t20 world cup. He kept saying dinda is pitching way too short and he called him ordinary after the match. Dinda did slowed down and I don't think dada never supported him after that.
diga Posted October 25, 2013 Posted October 25, 2013 Sreesanth/VRV/Ishant/Munaf were all fast tracked by Dravid & Chappell into the test team
saneindian Posted October 25, 2013 Posted October 25, 2013 Sreesanth/VRV/Ishant/Munaf were all fast tracked by Dravid & Chappell into the test team And one major thing that helped all these players in their early years was the Talent Resource Development Officers (TRDO) program of BCCI. For some reason when the Sharad Pawar Group took over, they disbanded the structure
Number Posted October 25, 2013 Posted October 25, 2013 Tinu Yohanan, Amit Bhandari, Avishkar Salvi, Joginder Sharma, Iqbal Siddiqui, JP Yadav, RP Singh (who used to bowl 125 at that time), Sanjay Bangar, Reetinder Sodhi What is common to the above list? Most of them 'maha trundlers', many of them 'malnourished & pathetic' besides having made their debut under Dada. Might as well add the likes of SS Das and Kaif who looked equally 'malnourished'. Had ICF been around, god knows the kind of abuses Ganguly would have got for picking these type of players. And all of them played 2-3, 2-3 matches and got discarded. Number of matches all of them played for India combined is lesser than no. of games Vinay alone has played. Bangar and Yadav were all rounders we tried for Robin Singh's replacement and both of them had more pace than Robin Singh.
adi B Posted October 25, 2013 Posted October 25, 2013 I personally consider the 2002 Natwest Final most hyped much much of last decade, but Ganguly's bold captaincy got the bright change Indian team needed. Inserting youngsters like Sehwag, Yuvraj, Kaif, Zaheer and having confidence in them was a big thing for Indian Cricket. Barring, Kaif, most of these players went on to be pretty Vital players for our country. He instilled this never say die attitude among Indian cricket players and a never lose hope attitude among us fans. How much ever the Bengali Jaghmohan Dalmiya corrupt was and taking the side of Ganguly to be the captain, it was the best thing to happen for Indian Cricket. In numbers, Dhoni will go on to become the greatest Indian captain. He already has but Ganguly changed the way India started looking to cricket. absolutely correct..we started to win test matches/series abroad.ganguly showed great faith on the youngster.the world cup run in 2003 was the best thing that happened to indian cricket ,after the nzl tour,nobody even considered us getting past the GS but the way he led a young indian pace attack was commendable
adi B Posted October 25, 2013 Posted October 25, 2013 Tinu Yohanan, Amit Bhandari, Avishkar Salvi, Joginder Sharma, Iqbal Siddiqui, JP Yadav, RP Singh (who used to bowl 125 at that time), Sanjay Bangar, Reetinder Sodhi What is common to the above list? Most of them 'maha trundlers', many of them 'malnourished & pathetic' besides having made their debut under Dada. Might as well add the likes of SS Das and Kaif who looked equally 'malnourished'. Had ICF been around, god knows the kind of abuses Ganguly would have got for picking these type of players. and they all got booted out rightly after playing just handful of matches..most of them except rp singh played less than 10 odis i think but here we have a captain who is giving assurances to guys like vinee of playing at least 100 odis,ishant of playing 100 test etc.. guys with poor odi records are still playing year in year out and still not dropped. hope u got the difference,its not only about selecting incompetent bowlers but at least drop them or dont give them a long rope where we know they will perform poorly
jusarrived Posted October 25, 2013 Posted October 25, 2013 lol Ganguly has to be the most overrated captain ever .
Scarves Posted October 25, 2013 Posted October 25, 2013 Ganguly is the best Indian captain I can think of as a thinker. Kumble I would have loved to see him in the job longer tbqh.
King Tendulkar Posted October 25, 2013 Posted October 25, 2013 Dada changed indian cricket and team. Not neccesssarliy in thinking but attitude, made us fighters and hungry Also defo tried and wanted fast bowlers i.e look at world cup final when we actually had fsat attack. Just did not have that many to choose from but defo tried to get pace in Dhoni meanwhile is a puppy and wants trundlers so his hands dont get hurt or so to please srini and southie co. Long live vinay
Jersey #10 Posted October 25, 2013 Posted October 25, 2013 Only one starlet shined through so many captaincy changes.... Sachin :hail:
someone Posted October 25, 2013 Posted October 25, 2013 Dada changed indian cricket and team. Not neccesssarliy in thinking but attitude, made us fighters and hungry Also defo tried and wanted fast bowlers i.e look at world cup final when we actually had fsat attack. Just did not have that many to choose from but defo tried to get pace in Dhoni meanwhile is a puppy and wants trundlers so his hands dont get hurt or so to please srini and southie co. Long live vinay Not true. Ganguly definitely brought a new direction to the team with his aggression. But what he also brought to the team was "ego". It doesn't get talked or mentioned often, but this ego culture, seniors/juniors, too big for the shoes happened greatly under Ganguly. And Chappel was at the receiving end of it when he tried to change that. Not to forget, Ganguly being a coward and his personal plays. Thus, really, this topic is a big fail without Dhoni as an option.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now