skindia Posted February 15, 2014 Posted February 15, 2014 I would have sent Rohit sharma as nightwatchman
Ultimate_Game Posted February 15, 2014 Posted February 15, 2014 I would have sent Rohit sharma as nightwatchman You would want your nightwatchman to see through the rest of the day :haha:
Raghav_12 Posted February 15, 2014 Posted February 15, 2014 atm his defense looks better than even Raina' date=especially against short stuff:giggle: I question the use of work EVEN here.
veer Posted February 15, 2014 Posted February 15, 2014 Ishant is designated night watchman for us.. End of story.. And Jaddu has proven what he is capable of ..
Lord Posted February 15, 2014 Posted February 15, 2014 I question the use of work EVEN here. specialist batsman :dontknow:
AnkurUpadhyay Posted February 15, 2014 Posted February 15, 2014 Zak hitting 150 The fastest I have ever seen him bowl is around early 140s in the 140-145 range. The fastest spell I have seen from an Indian pacer is by Umesh against Aus though he did spray it around a bit. In odis Nehra hitting 150kph against Eng in 2003 WC was the fastest' date=' and probably, the best spell I've seen from an Indian pacer in the shorter format.[/quote'] I have seen him touching 147k in 2003 WC.
express bowling Posted February 15, 2014 Posted February 15, 2014 You missed early part of his career? He used to be in high 130s to low to mid 140s in early 2000s even in tests. Can still remember how he troubled Andy Flower in his 232 series with pace and bounce in 2002' date=' I guess.[/quote'] I have actually tracked Zak's career even before he played for India. Bowled a lot of bouncers then. Was quite quick. CG was talking abound Zak's pace at the peak of his career , when he was taking wickets regularly. At that time he bowled 130 to 142 k. Many deliveries in the high 130s.
mancalledsting Posted February 15, 2014 Posted February 15, 2014 Any jokers here still wanna drop Dhawan? Impulsive, reactionary thinking needs to calm down before dismissing potentially good players. It would help if people were able to differentiate between not being able score at a high strike rate in ODIs overseas and being a test batsmen capable of accumuting decent scores. It would also help if people bothered to consider the historic track record of indian opening batsmen overseas before dismissing the current duo as relative no hopers. People calling for Rohit to be immediately displaced from the test side after half a dozen test matches should also consider the above example.
SLICKR392 Posted February 15, 2014 Posted February 15, 2014 Was lucky only once unlike Williamson. Since that drop from McCullum, he never gave them a chance again in both innings. This was a very fluent knock. Better than the gritty one in the last Test. His 98 set it up for us.
maniac Posted February 16, 2014 Posted February 16, 2014 Sir's worth was shown in 2 back to back tests when his brain farts resulted in loses to games that could have been won/saved. I understand people rating Jadeja's bowling(which is above average-good category) or his Fielding(which is worldclass and he is probably one of the best in the world) but his batting is P*** poor....hurts me to say that evry time as saying that demeans Indian domestic cricket where this hack has 3 300's
Ultimate_Game Posted February 16, 2014 Posted February 16, 2014 Sir's worth was shown in 2 back to back tests when his brain farts resulted in loses to games that could have been won/saved. I understand people rating Jadeja's bowling(which is above average-good category) or his Fielding(which is worldclass and he is probably one of the best in the world) but his batting is P*** poor....hurts me to say that evry time as saying that demeans Indian domestic cricket where this hack has 3 300's This. Jadeja is a decent all-round cricketer, especially in the subcontinent, with his brilliant fielding and more than handy bowling but as a batsman he hasn't done much.
Lord Posted February 16, 2014 Posted February 16, 2014 ^ hes batting at 8.you can hardly expect him to do much when others don't btw averaging 41 this series :--D
Ultimate_Game Posted February 16, 2014 Posted February 16, 2014 ^ hes batting at 8.you can hardly expect him to do much when others don't btw averaging 41 this series :--D My point was about Jaddu being promoted to the middle order so he could show his worth at 4. He's very hit and miss and 8 is the right position for him. In fact Ashwin may actually be a much better bat at 4.
Lord Posted February 16, 2014 Posted February 16, 2014 My point was about Jaddu being promoted to the middle order so he could show his worth at 4. He's very hit and miss and 8 is the right position for him. In fact Ashwin may actually be a much better bat at 4. agree.
vijay50 Posted February 16, 2014 Posted February 16, 2014 Big mistake persisting with Ishant and Rohit English team will be licking their lips waiting to feast on Ishant in the 5 test series,after this test. Ishant's good performance quota , once every 3 years is over after this test. Rohit , the less said the better it is. He will torment India for another 10 tests with low scores. Straight delivery should do the trick for him. Selectors,wake up and smell the coffee. Be wise and have a clear back up for Ishant and Rohit.
tweaker Posted February 16, 2014 Posted February 16, 2014 Team management should look after performance of some players like ie,Ishant Sharma,RohitSharma,M Vijay,R AshwinZaheer Khan.If we can select good players in their place,this team can become one of the best.
tweaker Posted February 16, 2014 Posted February 16, 2014 Zaheer has bowl this over at 136 speed.I think he is coming in his rhythm
urbestfriend Posted February 16, 2014 Posted February 16, 2014 I watched Zak bowling today, he is coming back to rhythm..Bowling slight variations, immaculate line and troubling batsmen..I think he has still something to give back.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now