CSK Fan Posted May 10, 2014 Posted May 10, 2014 Yep and look he is better off now no? He should be opening bowling for us in England he is must in side now What I meant was, people were saying he lacks test skills. Well, he has shown that he can learn and develop new skills very fast
CSK Fan Posted May 10, 2014 Posted May 10, 2014 Yep and look he is better off now no? He should be opening bowling for us in England he is must in side now What I meant was, people were saying he lacks test skills. Well, he has shown that he can learn and develop new skills very fast
undisputed chap Posted May 10, 2014 Posted May 10, 2014 You look at Pandey and you feel ' date='" If only this guy could bowl 135 to 142 k, he would be one of the best seamers around ".[/quote'] The question is can he do a bhuvi here:hail:
Old guy Posted May 10, 2014 Posted May 10, 2014 What I meant was' date=' people were saying he lacks test skills. Well, he has shown that he can learn and develop new skills very fast[/quote'] People never said he will never be a test bowler but on current skill many of us were correct and now he himself improved and ractified that ...
rkt.india Posted May 10, 2014 Posted May 10, 2014 Pandey is mainly around 130-136. Mohit 133-140. BK 132-139.
express bowling Posted May 10, 2014 Posted May 10, 2014 What I meant was' date=' people were saying he lacks test skills. Well, he has shown that he can learn and develop new skills very fast[/quote'] Isn't that the obvious thing to happen. If a player has shortcomings , that will be pointed out. If he improves then that is going to be praised. If he deteriorates , like Munaf, then he will be criticized later.. even though he was praised initially. Now ..... the important thing for Bhuvi is to hold on to this improvement even in test matches. And add more skills like reverse swing and consistent seam movement.
SLICKR392 Posted May 10, 2014 Posted May 10, 2014 What I meant was' date=' people were saying he lacks test skills. Well, he has shown that he can learn and develop new skills very fast[/quote']
beetle Posted May 10, 2014 Posted May 10, 2014 Calm down' date=' Mr.Nair.[/quote'] :agree:keep calm...kanna keep calm.
vishalvirsingh Posted May 11, 2014 Author Posted May 11, 2014 146k by umesh many times ... One ball hit for 4 on leg.
asterix Posted May 11, 2014 Posted May 11, 2014 146k by umesh many times ... One ball hit for 4 on leg. It was a third class over. Directionless and short stuff.. He's very short of confidence.. He also seems to have lost his mojo which usually happens when you get married...
vishalvirsingh Posted May 11, 2014 Author Posted May 11, 2014 It was a third class over. Directionless and short stuff.. He's very short of confidence.. He also seems to have lost his mojo which usually happens when you get married... Loosing mojo Wat it means n how it is bcos Of marriage I believe he shud be more relaxed after marriage. But yes I agree he is disappointing us more often. But I still believe he can be real good.
fineleg Posted May 11, 2014 Posted May 11, 2014 UY's speed is good. He is rusty without match practice thanks to MSD. What does marriage have to do anything with line and length and mojo?
CSK Fan Posted May 11, 2014 Posted May 11, 2014 Isn't that the obvious thing to happen. If a player has shortcomings , that will be pointed out. If he improves then that is going to be praised. If he deteriorates , like Munaf, then he will be criticized later.. even though he was praised initially. Now ..... the important thing for Bhuvi is to hold on to this improvement even in test matches. And add more skills like reverse swing and consistent seam movement. But the criticism usually is that he should not be given a chance in the test team at all
rkt.india Posted May 11, 2014 Posted May 11, 2014 But the criticism usually is that he should not be given a chance in the test team at all He has played 6 tests already. That criticism to not play test is because of his lack of pace which is still there but because conditions will help his kind of bowling in England, his current speed is enough to trouble batsmen there which might not do in India.
express bowling Posted May 11, 2014 Posted May 11, 2014 But the criticism usually is that he should not be given a chance in the test team at all He should not have been taken as long as he has or had the shortcomings. If and when he overcomes or has already overcome them and looks like a wicket taker in tests then he obviously becomes a candidate. Same logic should apply to everybody. A test spot is nobody's personal property .... nor should it be out of reach of a player who has improved and become test quality recently.
CSK Fan Posted May 11, 2014 Posted May 11, 2014 He should not have been taken as long as he has or had the shortcomings. If and when he overcomes or has already overcome them and looks like a wicket taker in tests then he obviously becomes a candidate. Same logic should apply to everybody. A test spot is nobody's personal property .... nor should it be out of reach of a player who has improved and become test quality recently. How does one develop test skills without playing? You are making it sound that we had loads of amazing bowlers who deserved a go in tests before him. When the reality is, the guys keeping him out of the team were Ishant sahrma and an aging Zaheer. For a nation starving for bowling talent, we are so comfortable playing the same tried and tested failures like Ishant rather than giving a young bowler, who is willing to learn, a chance.
CSK Fan Posted May 11, 2014 Posted May 11, 2014 He has played 6 tests already. That criticism to not play test is because of his lack of pace which is still there but because conditions will help his kind of bowling in England' date=' his current speed is enough to trouble batsmen there which might not do in India.[/quote'] And 6 tests for a young bowler is enough? It is like judging him based on the australia series where he got carted around. IMO, given enough chance he will be a great bowler in tests in India too.
Recommended Posts