Iconoclast Posted August 1, 2014 Posted August 1, 2014 Let's say kohli slaps and abuses a paki player without any video evidence and then gets away with no punishment.would love to see ur reaction at that time :giggle: Slap ? We are talking shoving here.
Crookbond Posted August 1, 2014 Posted August 1, 2014 Good .. sanity returns to cricket ... these types of minor tussles happen all the time in sports and need not result in major bans. As for Dhoni and Indian team management, I think they are the guilty ones for trying to take advantage of this situation to rid the opposing team of their best player. However in the end it has only left England more emboldened and India looking embarrassed. Big :fail: and :finger: Dhoni for this lame ploy that has backfired in ur face. Anderson isn't even remotely the best player in the opposition while the charge was lodged.
BlueBee Posted August 1, 2014 Posted August 1, 2014 Slap ? We are talking shoving here. Johnson will shove you guys with the ball. Mark my words. You won't be able to return the favor too :yay:
Marco Polo Posted August 1, 2014 Posted August 1, 2014 Good .. sanity returns to cricket ... these types of minor tussles happen all the time in sports and need not result in major bans. As for Dhoni and Indian team management, I think they are the guilty ones for trying to take advantage of this situation to rid the opposing team of their best player. However in the end it has only left England more emboldened and India looking embarrassed. Big :fail: and :finger: Dhoni for this lame ploy that has backfired in ur face. can't continue with suhas id? I repeat it again for you. We are not pakis, we don't try to get rid of players like that.
adi B Posted August 1, 2014 Posted August 1, 2014 Slap ? We are talking shoving here. Yeah but I have taken it to a different level!! U will be the first one to whine that bcci used their power,influence to save their player and play the victim's card,no justice to our player blah blah
Iconoclast Posted August 1, 2014 Posted August 1, 2014 can't continue with suhas id? I repeat it again for you. We are not pakis' date=' we don't try to get rid of players like that.[/quote'] Dafuq you talking about ? :WTF:
ThePhenomenal1 Posted August 1, 2014 Posted August 1, 2014 LOL when india needed srini power he does nothing. WTF man, hate anderson.. the f'n ***** sledged rahane too. This is why i wish we had kohli! MC BC his ass
Sarkar Posted August 1, 2014 Posted August 1, 2014 ICC has no balls different rules for different teams.
The Realist Posted August 1, 2014 Posted August 1, 2014 Expected result with an Aussie judge. Dhoni has been left looking foolish though after all his statements on this case. But hey its all about the process and not the results as he always says...
Yoda-esque Posted August 1, 2014 Posted August 1, 2014 Expected result with an Aussie judge. Dhoni has been left looking foolish though after all his statements on this case. But hey its all about the process and not the results as he always says... So you think he shouldn't have appealed?
singhprakash72 Posted August 1, 2014 Posted August 1, 2014 Dhoni should throw tantrums and make a big deal out of it :haha:....Anderson in next two test matches means 3-1 defeat for India. I think Dhoni wanted to prove a point to this English side, by implicating Mr Anderson. I bet BCCI legal team must have given him thumbs up to go ahead for pressing the charges without looking into evidence. Indian board as usual will always be reactive than proactive on such matters.
beetle Posted August 1, 2014 Posted August 1, 2014 Jadeja was alleged to have turned towards Anderson in a threatening manner and had originally been found guilty by match referee David Boon at a previous hearing and fined 50% of his match fee. After applying legal pressure India were allowed to lodge an appeal, which was heard today, and Jadeja was also found not guilty. If BCCI had a backdoor deal with their board then they should just go die. If dhoni has any shame he would get his brain back and play the next game like a warrior.He should think of it as a major ICC tournament that he has not won before...that should do the trick.
Ram Posted August 1, 2014 Posted August 1, 2014 WTF, how is that even possible? Didnt the England team not say publicly that Anderson did push Jadeja in the corridors, but that was only because Jadeja turned to Anderson and 'advanced menacingly towards him..' Plus, how is that both parties are now innocent. That means no one actually did anything. So the Eng/India management simply decided to cook something up and filed fake charges against each other?
beetle Posted August 1, 2014 Posted August 1, 2014 WTF' date=' how is that even possible? Didnt the England team not say publicly that Anderson did push Jadeja in the corridors, but that was only because Jadeja turned to Anderson and [i']'advanced menacingly towards him..' Plus, how is that both parties are now innocent. That means no one actually did anything. So the Eng/India management simply decided to cook something up and filed fake charges against each other? Who knows...with Star as the official sponsor....they wanted some spicy tadka to the series.Later realised.......mirchi jyada ho gayee....:giggle:
ThePhenomenal1 Posted August 1, 2014 Posted August 1, 2014 Dhoni should throw tantrums and make a big deal out of it :haha:....Anderson in next two test matches means 3-1 defeat for India. I think Dhoni wanted to prove a point to this English side, by implicating Mr Anderson. I bet BCCI legal team must have given him thumbs up to go ahead for pressing the charges without looking into evidence. Indian board as usual will always be reactive than proactive on such matters. he couldnt win it for england at lords on a green mamba.. whats this obsession with anderson.. "if anderson is in, india loses. if not, india wins." WTF since when was that the case?
sensible-indian Posted August 1, 2014 Posted August 1, 2014 Dunno what happened. The bright side is that if we do well in the last 2 tests (hopefully being the keyword here), no one can say our win was due to Anderson not being there. If we get thrashed by Eng, so be it. If we beat Eng, it would make this victory look sweeter. Winning when the opposition have their best players is the best feeling.
G_B_ Posted August 1, 2014 Posted August 1, 2014 Apparently Anderson admitted to abusing and pushing Jadeja. It was not contested. He was let off cause he acted in self defense. Quite frankly that is the most ridiculous judgement i have read.
G_B_ Posted August 1, 2014 Posted August 1, 2014 Dunno what happened. The bright side is that if we do well in the last 2 tests (hopefully being the keyword here), no one can say our win was due to Anderson not being there. If we get thrashed by Eng, so be it. If we beat Eng, it would make this victory look sweeter. Winning when the opposition have their best players is the best feeling. u migrated from ********** welcome.
maniac Posted August 1, 2014 Posted August 1, 2014 Makes sense Pakis defending this....For all the Ghosht eating Pakis and the ghaas-Phoos eating Indians,they didn't do jack s*** when Barbie broke one of their player's hands in a clearest form of Dbag act or when Finn pushed Ajmal for all to see and that too in UAE,they had their tails between their legs :giggle:
sensible-indian Posted August 1, 2014 Posted August 1, 2014 u migrated from ********** welcome. Thanks. I am there in both.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now