Jump to content

Prosper Utseya and Ajmal reported for a suspected bowling action


CSK Fan

Recommended Posts

Posted
ICC was late to act in case of Murali. By then he had taken 500+ test wickets by means of unfair action. Good to see that ICC has taken early notice of Saeed Ajmals chucking.
They are late in Ajmal's case too. He is already practicing bowling without chucking now a days and is not effective.
Posted
At that time India was in SL corner so Murali was protected by India. So was Sohaib. Now India and SL do not get along and these busturds are on their own.
Yes. Dalmia went against ICC in Murali and Shoaib's case. Yet these people abuse India.
Posted

India supported Murali to grab power in ICC. Don't try to be saints. Bangladesh was given test status for just that. It was an unwritten deal, stop whining about it.

Posted
India supported Murali to grab power in ICC. Don't try to be saints. Bangladesh was given test status for just that. It was an unwritten deal' date=' stop whining about it.[/quote'] Who's trying to be saints? Indian fans here have accused Bhaji and Ojha as well. Anyhow, continue your bromance with Padosis.
Posted
India supported Murali to grab power in ICC. Don't try to be saints. Bangladesh was given test status for just that. It was an unwritten deal' date=' stop whining about it.[/quote'] Lol.SLC is a poor board with hardly any power.Bcci has power because it has money.Thats all.It doesnt need SLC for that.
Posted
They are late in Ajmal's case too. He is already practicing bowling without chucking now a days and is not effective.
Better late than never. Just because there was a delay / mistake in not reporting him for chucking, they should not continue to avoid it forever.
Posted
Lol.SLC is a poor board with hardly any power.Bcci has power because it has money.Thats all.It doesnt need SLC for that.
This shows typical BCCI mindset in a country which had a rich tradition of showing gratitude. BCCI was a POS in mid 90s, and once Pakistan, SL and SAF joined hands with BCCI it became the current monster. IF SL didn't back Murali and let him fade away, it would have never brought the Asian block together and BCCI would never had been so powerful.
Posted
This shows typical BCCI mindset in a country which had a rich tradition of showing gratitude. BCCI was a POS in mid 90s' date=' and once Pakistan, SL and SAF joined hands with BCCI it became the current monster.[b'] IF SL didn't back Murali and let him fade away, it would have never brought the Asian block together and BCCI would never had been so powerful.
What logic, man. My mind is blown.
Posted
This shows typical BCCI mindset in a country which had a rich tradition of showing gratitude. BCCI was a POS in mid 90s' date=' and once Pakistan, SL and SAF joined hands with BCCI it became the current monster. IF SL didn't back Murali and let him fade away, it would have never brought the Asian block together and BCCI would never had been so powerful.[/quote'] SL and PCB backed BCCI because they wanted BCCIs money nothing else. CSA and BCCI go far back.It was BCCI which helped get CSA back into ICC. Even now BCCI is powerful in ICC but with allies called ECB and CA. BCCI was always the money bags of Asia and then world cricket.See how BCCI has refused to share money and hence other asian boards cannot hold the WC on their own now. SLC is a powerless board and Murali got saved by BCCI.
Posted
India supported Murali to grab power in ICC. Don't try to be saints. Bangladesh was given test status for just that. It was an unwritten deal' date=' stop whining about it.[/quote'] your board doesn't even pay your cricketers. You guys were bankrupt few months back. BCCI helped you suckers by playing your team. Sri Lanka needs us more than we need you beggars.
Posted
India supported Murali to grab power in ICC. Don't try to be saints. Bangladesh was given test status for just that. It was an unwritten deal' date=' stop whining about it.[/quote'] India does not depend on SL for power. Sheer size of the economy is the reason India should have the power. They supported Murali because of racism past and out of goodness. BTW India still has the power without your help. Why dont you withdraw the support.
Posted
This shows typical BCCI mindset in a country which had a rich tradition of showing gratitude. BCCI was a POS in mid 90s' date=' and once Pakistan, SL and SAF joined hands with BCCI it became the current monster. IF SL didn't back Murali and let him fade away, it would have never brought the Asian block together and BCCI would never had been so powerful.[/quote'] You live in a alternate world. India just got the power without your and pakistan help. Keep on deluding yourself.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...