Jump to content

Haider- new film painting Army as villains whilst glorifying separatsists


Recommended Posts

Posted

No one has the balls to do a movie on Pandits. They're expendable as they belong to the majority community.

Posted

People must read what its writer Bashrat Peer who is from Kashmir has said.

"I still have an Indian passport as that is the only travel document available to anyone from the Indian-controlled-part of Kashmir. The question of my nationality continues to be a matter of dispute. I refer to myself as a Kashmiri, as a journalist, as a writer. "The Kashmiris are saying no to being ruled by India, no to an inclusion into the Indian union." "Militancy was a political response to the erosion of Kashmir’s autonomy and democratic political space by the Indian government and hence the demand for azaadi" "Stone-pelting is an old form of political protest in Kashmir and elsewhere."
Posted
People must read what its writer Bashrat Peer who is from Kashmir has said.
does this fool not know that only Kashmiri Sunnis want to get separated from India? What about Hindus? Shias? Ladakh's Buddhists? and Sikhs? All of these other groups want to be with India.
Posted
does this fool not know that only Kashmiri Sunnis want to get separated from India? What about Hindus? Shias? Ladakh's Buddhists? and Sikhs? All of these other groups want to be with India.
watched the movie yesterday.very good movie,although completely one sided. But ours is a free country,all opinions should be allowed,whether right or wrong
Posted
A discussion about Haider as a cinema. This is what a prominent writer-director said "It was just talk . . . and an excuse . . . I found it completely unfelt . . . and by the time the pre climax / climax came . . . with those maut ke farishte suddenly singing (sorry for a few spoilers) . . . iss picture ke sur bhatak chuke thhhe . . . suddenly Steven Soderbergh se Tarantino pahunch gaye thhhe" "We are discussing this as Cinema . . . which is full of tokenism . . . symbolic only at times . . . jumping from one genre to another . . . and with no heart whatsoever . . . I didnt ONCE feel for anybody . . . even though most actors did a great job." "Even the oedipal complex . . . so well enacted by both Shahid and Tabu . . . and integral to Hamlet . . . seemed forced . . ." "the heart was most conspicuous by its absence . . . and I seriously have a problem with political messaging if not felt or understood in great detail . . . I know blood looks great on snow in a cemetry" "As a concept it was a SUPERB idea! Where Tabu was the metaphor for Kashmir . . . the 2 men being the 2 nations . . . and Shahid the confused half militant / half innocent child of Kashmir today . . . that's why it annoyed me . . . when it just messed it up"
Posted

This film had 40 plus cuts by Censor board which means it had a lot more to it then what people are seeing. After reading what the writer of the film had to say, I am afraid if those cuts were there, it could have gone very badly with a lot of people.

Posted

Kashmiri Muslims have played the victim card perfectly. First they killed millions of Pandits to make Kashmir a 100% Muslim state, joined hands with Pak to destabilize India, isolated rest of India with article 370 and lo behold even educated people have started showing sympathy to these lads while trying to justify their opinion that somehow in all of this Indian army are the villains (without any concrete proof) Like it or not Kashmir problem is out and out a religious problem. Kashmiri Muslims have historically hated their Hindu counterparts and the whole idea of independent Kashmir/joining Pak is based on the simple fact that they are Muslims and regard Hindus and Sikhs as infidels. Most of the people involved in Haider(actors, director, cinematographer etc) are Muslims, Vishal Bharadwaj is a sickular who signed the letter warning youth against electing communal Modi. In the name of free speech c***s like him will sell the country in case of a foreign attack, disgusting traitors.

×
×
  • Create New...