Jump to content

Kohli is India's greatest ODI player - Rohan Gavaskar


sachin34357

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am huge Sachin fan ...A sachin bhakt if you may call...I can say happily that Virat is evolving into a better batsman than Sachin and as Indians, we all should feel happy and proud..

Posted

I will reserve my praise for him........he hasn't been the catalyst in any of our overseas LOI series wins.......I obviously won't count the Zimbabwe series........he still needs to prove himself big time imo........

Posted

He has to achieve this in world cup to be compared with Sachin Its all good doing in bilateral series but Sachin was the best player in 96 and 03 world cups and had a great 2011 WC as well So its still a fair bit behind him.

Posted
He needs to do it against better attack in their own den. He struggled in SA' date=' was abysmal in Aus against Aus.[/quote'] yup all this lankan bashing isnt getting me excited
Posted

Bilateral odis series are meaningless,For me Icc tourneys are odis pinnacle and yuvi,sachin,kapil,amarnath,zak all those who helped us win are the best.

Posted
Sachin was a great ODI batsmen but at the end of the day Kohli and Dhoni will pass him. The latter two are pure match winners (better match winners than Sachin) and when all is said and done it will be the following order in ODI's: 1. Kohli 2. Dhoni 3. Sachin
Sachin was in similar form at same age. I guess SRT scored 20 centuries in 150-160 matches at SR of 92-93 while playing ODIs in 90s.
Posted

How do u define match winners? The guys when its their day will win u the match solely on their performances or just finishers who play their role or only while chasing. None of the above holds true its a team game afterall.

Posted
Bilateral odis series are meaningless' date='For me Icc tourneys are odis pinnacle and yuvi,sachin,kapil,amarnath,zak all those who helped us win are the best.[/quote'] Thats not how it goes. No ODI is meaningless. You still have to score and win them. World cups are otherwise meaningless too. He did contribute in CT final which is far better than WC with no easy matches.
Posted
Sachin was in similar form at same age. I guess SRT scored 20 centuries in 150-160 matches at SR of 92-93 while playing ODIs in 90s.
What? He scored first 100 after 70 matches.
Posted
Talent wise its difficult to separate both of them...but Kohli seems to have better mental strength and temparament than Sachin in tense situations...
SRT was far more complete batsman.
Posted
What? He scored first 100 after 70 matches.
I am talking about the age from which Kohli started playing. I guess both have similar records during that phase 21-26. At that SRT was best in tests also. From 94-99, he was like freak in both formats. Imagine Kohli scoring at an avg of 60 in tests also that while playing against best bowling era for ODIs and great bowling attacks in tests. That will give you SRT.
Posted
Sachin was in similar form at same age. I guess SRT scored 20 centuries in 150-160 matches at SR of 92-93 while playing ODIs in 90s.
sachin had an average of 40 and scored 12 centuries after playing 150 ODIs..
Posted
sachin had an average of 40 and scored 12 centuries after playing 150 ODIs..
This is what I am talking about. From age 21 to 26 Matches: 164 Runs: 6892 Avg: 47.20 SR: 90.49 100s: 24 Tests during same time Matches: 45 Runs: 4116 Avg: 61.43 100s: 16 Both have similar records in ODIs and SRT was like Kohli in god mode in both formats. Imagine what would we think of Kohli if he had performances in tests.
Posted

Only numbers here During same phase SRT 1st inning Matches: 80 Runs: 3269 Avg: 42 100s: 12 SR: 85.19 2nd Inning Matches: 80 Runs: 3623 Avg: 52.50 100s: 12 SR: 95.87 Won matches while chasing Matches: 44 Runs: 2518 Avg: 76.30 SR: 98.01 100s: 11 1 100 was in lost match. Kohli 1st inning Matches: 59 Runs: 2159 Avg: 39 100s: 7 SR: 86.42 2nd Inning Matches: 84 Runs: 4049 Avg: 64.26 SR: 92.84 100s: 14 13 in won matches and 1 in lost matches.

Posted
I am talking about the age from which Kohli started playing. I guess both have similar records during that phase 21-26. At that SRT was best in tests also. From 94-99' date=' he was like freak in both formats. Imagine Kohli scoring at an avg of 60 in tests also that while playing against best bowling era for ODIs and great bowling attacks in tests. That will give you SRT.[/quote'] That is not the right comparison because SRT was already established in international cricket by 21 and played 4 years of international cricket, while Kohli took time to settle down after that at least 2 years, Tendulkar did same too. It is only after 2011 WC that he started scoring 100s that heavily. SRT started scoring 100 once he started opening in ODIs. Kohli debuted in tests in 2011 , now its 3 years. What is the SRT's record in his firt 3 years of test cricket? Take it that way, not by age which is misleading. Same Kohli debuted in ODIs in 2008, now 6 years since, so now find what was SRT's record in his first 6 years of ODI career. That will give you a better idea.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...