kaptaan Posted December 20, 2014 Posted December 20, 2014 Umesh - 8 Inn, 18 wkts, S/R -48, Avg - 36 Waqar - 12 Inn, 14 wkts, S/R-81, Avg - 41 Akhtar - 10 Inn, 17 wkts, S/R-60, Avg-44 Just saying B->B->
rkt.india Posted December 20, 2014 Posted December 20, 2014 It is not east to take wickets in Aus for SC fast bowlers who lack control. You need to hit right lengths there. Margin of error is very low. Balls comes on to the bat, runs are scored quickly.
Magneto Posted December 20, 2014 Posted December 20, 2014 Expected hai. We all know that Umesh is better than Waqar and Akhtar put together.
kaptaan Posted December 20, 2014 Author Posted December 20, 2014 And what about England ?? Umesh hasn't played in england yet :((
amiret Posted December 20, 2014 Posted December 20, 2014 well clearly he is a better bowler than those two .
Sandeep99 Posted December 20, 2014 Posted December 20, 2014 One more similarity. Neither of Waqar, Akthar, Umesh have a single draw/win in Australia :hysterical:
BlueBee Posted December 20, 2014 Posted December 20, 2014 well clearly he is a better bowler than those two . Indeed he is. :agree:
express bowling Posted December 20, 2014 Posted December 20, 2014 Umesh now has 37 wickets from 10 tests. Average 32 and strike rate of 45. Yet, we don't play him. This is madness.
Temujin Khaghan Posted December 20, 2014 Posted December 20, 2014 i cant understand why a genius bowler like Waqar has such a record in OZ? no sarcasm.
rkt.india Posted December 20, 2014 Posted December 20, 2014 i cant understand why a genius bowler like Waqar has such a record in OZ? no sarcasm. difficult to get reverse here. Waqar was not consistent too, depended a lot on old ball and once he lost pace, depended on swing. Both not available in Aus. In Aus, you need consistency.
hhhhdmt Posted December 20, 2014 Posted December 20, 2014 Waqar lost pace post 1997. After losing his pace he was nowhere near as good as before Besides, waqar was bowling to Ponting, Steve and Mark Waugh, Gilchrist etc. not an easy task when you are so reliant on pace and when u have already lost 10-15 kph on your bowling
Jhoncena30 Posted December 20, 2014 Posted December 20, 2014 And dhoniconda was selecting trundler m. Sharma over him
India-KXIP fan Posted December 20, 2014 Posted December 20, 2014 Umesh - 8 Inn, 18 wkts, S/R -48, Avg - 36 Waqar - 12 Inn, 14 wkts, S/R-81, Avg - 41 Akhtar - 10 Inn, 17 wkts, S/R-60, Avg-44 Just saying B->B-> That average is going down. This match he had 5-150 :nice: And his strike rate of 45 after 10 tests is very impressive. So much for those bashing him for being a scattergun :finger: Pace > all Never seen a trundler with SR less than 60 even.
adi B Posted December 20, 2014 Posted December 20, 2014 Yadav career stats 10 matches 37 wkts @32 s/r 45!! Sure he goes for runs but he is an out and out wkt taker,what a cracking strike rate!! Was so unlucky to miss out on possible 9 test matches in saf,nzl,eng,his stats would have improved and would have grown more as a bowler
ThePhenomenal1 Posted December 20, 2014 Posted December 20, 2014 what a badass, neglected yet storms in and takes wickets and fights to make a 30. If dhoni, kohli, rohit and rahane made just 30 each, thats 120 more runs.
Laaloo Posted December 20, 2014 Posted December 20, 2014 what a badass' date=' neglected yet storms in and takes wickets and fights to make a 30. If dhoni, kohli, rohit and rahane made just 30 each, thats 120 more runs.[/quote'] Dhoni made runs for Smith Kohli made runs for smith rohit made runs for Johnson how many more runs do you need?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now