Jump to content

Why are Australia so good?


MCGGG

Recommended Posts

Posted
They are not even as good as the Indian team . of the late noughties
:haha: ok but was the Indian ODI team of the late noughties as good as the Aus team of that period ? At Home on the Flat Mud tracks of India ? In the period 2005-2010 , Aus dominated India in India . Out of 14 ODI matches they won 9 , we won 4. In the last 5 Years we have become better at defeating Aus in India.
Posted

Talking of odis aus lost 3-2 in India,lost 4-0 in England in 2012,lost 8 of the 14 odis against lanka at home,drew 2-2 in Windies,poor in the CT all this in the last 2-3 years.they are not that great

Posted

This question is like the America and the rest of the world asking "Why are Indians so smart?" Smart as in American way of saying - Good in education. Well it's something we put lot of heart in growing up as kids. Same thing. These Aussies who play sports give it all. Not that the others country players don't. It's their whole infrastructure and management and making sure right person and deserving player is playing at the right time makes them always a challening side to beat as they are usually playing their best players who are at their best. They all do certain things which they are really good at and not bits and piences in little things so that they can cover every part.

Posted
This question is like the America and the rest of the world asking "Why are Indians so smart?" Smart as in American way of saying - Good in education. Well it's something we put lot of heart in growing up as kids. Same thing. These Aussies who play sports give it all. Not that the others country players don't. It's their whole infrastructure and management and making sure right person and deserving player is playing at the right time makes them always a challening side to beat as they are usually playing their best players who are at their best. They all do certain things which they are really good at and not bits and piences in little things so that they can cover every part.
:laugh: Dont be delusional. Nobody asks this. Its just another thing which only exists in Indians' imagination, just like Microsoft, NASA has 43 % Indians BS which somehow gets propagated on the internet.
Posted

take out warner and maxwell..their team is shyte..an out of form India can score 265 against their attack.I cant wait to see SA beat the crap out of them

Posted
take out warner and maxwell..their team is shyte..an out of form India can score 265 against their attack.I cant wait to see SA beat the crap out of them
Smith? Faulkner?
Posted

I say this as an Australian, I always worry when we are chasing. Faulkner can only save our rear ends so many times. However, this is the first time where we bat ridiculously deep. Mitch Johnson at 9 and Starc at 10 is a ridiculous lower order, even Hazelwood or Cummins are hardly bunnies.

Posted

Nah they are just overrated. It's just they never came across a team with decent bowling attack. Let them face against new zealand or SA. They are going to fold just like us. Now that faulkner is out of the picture, it's only a matter of time before someone exposes their batting weakness.

Posted
Nah they are just overrated. It's just they never came across a team with decent bowling attack. Let them face against new zealand or SA. They are going to fold just like us. Now that faulkner is out of the picture' date=' it's only a matter of time before someone exposes their batting weakness.[/quote'] We beat South Africa in the last ODI series and New Zealand's attack I don't worry about that much, I worry about Boult but the others are very hittable so to speak. Spoke to someone yesterday who knows Alex Koutoris (sp.)- physio for Australia. Faulkner will only miss 1-2 games at the most. Will be back for the 3rd match at the latest. One of those games is Bangladesh and I'll say this frankly, if we can't beat them in Australia, the whole team should be sacked. Can get away playing Mitch Marsh in Faulkner's spot in game 1. Have heard Faulkner hasn't been internally ruled out of the first game anyway, but I can see them taking the conservative option and him missing 2 games.
Posted
:laugh: Dont be delusional. Nobody asks this. Its just another thing which only exists in Indians' imagination, just like Microsoft, NASA has 43 % Indians BS which somehow gets propagated on the internet.
:haha: NASA does not even maintain a category named "Indian" employee. They have 6% Asians on their payroll. As for MSFT, the figures are not so bad and between 10-15%. These pseudo patriots do our nation more harm than good.
Posted
take out warner and maxwell..their team is shyte..an out of form India can score 265 against their attack.I cant wait to see SA beat the crap out of them
Smith? Finch? Take out Kohli and Rohit from India. Take out de Villiers and Amla from South Africa. Take out Williamson and Taylor from New Zealand. Take out Matthews from Sri Lanka. Take out Misbah and Afridi from Pakistan. Take out Gayle and Samuels from West Indies.
Posted
If US starts playing cricket' date=' Australia will be walk in the park.[/quote'] Except that the US is not great at international team sport. Their performance in international baseball, basketball, soccer and ice hockey tournaments is not exceptional. US would probably take the IPL style of cricket much more seriously than international competitions.
Posted
:laugh: Dont be delusional. Nobody asks this. Its just another thing which only exists in Indians' imagination, just like Microsoft, NASA has 43 % Indians BS which somehow gets propagated on the internet.
No one asks such a question. India is a shockingly poor country and has an average IQ of about 80 as per research. Not saying Lanka is much better but then again we don't like to shower praise on ourselves. As SAARC states get richer per capita ave IQ will increase - Flynn effect - but frankly too many Indians lie about this and that. 43% of NASA :giggle: http://www.photius.com/rankings/national_iq_scores_country_ranks.html
Posted
Except that the US is not great at international team sport. Their performance in international baseball, basketball, soccer and ice hockey tournaments is not exceptional. US would probably take the IPL style of cricket much more seriously than international competitions.
Are u kidding? US dominates in the Olympics every year...pretty much would own australia in every sports out there. if cricket was to be serious in US it would make more revenue than all the test nations comnined. No one even takes soccer srsly yet still the team plays exceptionally well. We do however take soccer srsly at women's international which is why it's pretty much no 1 women's team.
Guest nimesh632
Posted

Why Australia better ? So many reason, home ground, other bowler somehow not able to bowl Same killing way like Oz, look yesterday . In 35 balls, Warner and maxi hammer 160 with 25 fours and 10 sixes, what is Feeble India did , they scored 35 in 49 balls between Dhoni,Raina,Binny,Rohit,Kohli. Australia have match winner allrounder, Watson, Faulkner,johnson,maxwell , Mitchell marsh is good bowler too., their fielding is sharpe, wicketkeeper not drop catch, Wade was weak in keeping they dropped him.do you think India and Lanka afford to drop even failure keeper, they keep playing, Dhawan keep playing despite failure,Naman sit and poor guy has no chance for even warm up game. I, myself cricketer during my college days in India and no cricketer want to deliver bad ball but It just happen.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...